2024年12月24日 星期二

Bauhaus群英及Bauhaus Journal:Walter Gropius. Klee and Kandinsky at the Bauhaus (Christies)。幾本Wassily Wassilyevich Kandinsky (1866~1944)中文書. Murnau am Staffelsee Oskar Schlemmer,JosefAlbers1888-1976. 1940;Like an Egyptian … psychology and the riddle of style. 「向方形致敬」的色彩大師──約瑟夫・亞伯斯(Josef Albers) Marcel Breuer

 





JosefAlbers1888-1976.   1940;Like an Egyptian … psychology and the riddle of style. 「向方形致敬」的色彩大師──約瑟夫・亞伯斯(Josef Albers) 作者:賴嘉綾 /


🎉‪#HappyBirthday🎂to artist #JosefAlbers, born ‪#onthisday‬ in 1888. Photo at Black Mountain College, 1940.‬

Josef Albers 1888-1976


The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York

Happy birthday to Josef Albers, one of the most important teachers and influential personalities at the Bauhaus from its inception. “Homage to the Square" is a collection of explorations in color and spatial relationships in which Albers limited himself to square formats, solid colors and precise geometry, yet was able to achieve a seemingly endless range of visual effects.








Josef Albers | Homage to the Square: Soft Spoken | 1969

METMUSEUM.ORG

Josef Albers
Artist

Josef Albers was a German-born American artist and educator whose work, both in Europe and in the United States, formed the basis of some of the most influential and far-reaching art education programs of the twentieth century. Wikipedia


Born: March 19, 1888, Bottrop, Germany

Died: March 25, 1976, New Haven, Connecticut, United States


Now on view at the School of Art’s 32 Edgewood Avenue Gallery, "Search Versus Re-Search: Josef Albers, Artist and Educator," an exhibition featuring works by Albers, former chair of the school’s Department of Design, alongside student works from his classroom.


Yale School of Art exhibition examines impact of Josef Albers’ art and teaching
The Yale School of Art launches its 2015–2016 season with an exhibition...
NEWS.YALE.EDU




「向方形致敬」的色彩大師──約瑟夫・亞伯斯(Josef Albers)



這天傍晚媽媽買了一條咖啡色的裙子,隔天陽光一照竟然是紫色的。有沒有這樣的經驗?明明是兩件黑色衣服,搭在一起時,一件偏綠,一件偏藍。看著一幅畫,那如影的湖水是用藍綠色形容,還是綠藍色呢?自從在印刷廠著迷的看著繪本印刷過程之後,更常注意到大家在討論顏色時的挫折,我們在電腦螢幕上看到的是由光的RGB三色投射生成的結果;彩色印刷則為 C(Cyan青色)、M(Magenta洋紅)、Y(Yellow黃)、K(black黑)四色,是對於光或顏料混合之後生成的結果,我們在視覺上所反應出的顏色因色彩本質、光線強度與折射、加上人體個別差異,必須經過專門校色才能趨近。顏色的敏銳度除了有天生的基本能力,也可仰賴後天學習。

之前拜訪瑪莉安.杜莎(Marion Deuchars)時,她說每天到工作室的第一件事,通常先用顏色暖身。方法有好幾種,最常用的是從一張名畫裡挑顏色複製,在自己的調色盤上調出最接近畫上的顏色,完成紀錄;譬如高更梵谷歐姬芙孟克都是她練習的對象,某些畫家的顏色很難模仿,即使只模擬五個顏色,也要分好幾次才完成,不過後來越來越得心應手。

練習模擬畫家的五個常用色。(圖 / Colour 內頁)


另一種是使用點畫,她採用同心圓式的點法,以八個點為中心最小的一圈,然後14、20、26、32⋯⋯漸次擴大範圍。可以是同色系或是七彩變化的,畫點的時候養成的專注尤其能夠穩定心情。還有其他以潑灑、剪貼、或以「色系」來列舉顏色的名稱,尋找顏色的差異與命名。後來這些作法結集成一本書,書名是 Colour。其中有一跨頁上列出24種微差異的黑色;另外還有一頁說明顏色與其互補色放在一起有什麼樣的效果,譬如橘色與藍色是最撞色的組合之一,如果將橘色方形放在藍色方形裡,有什麼樣的效果呢?如果在兩個顏色之間加上灰色,對顏色的感覺會有改變嗎?

同心圓的顏色練習。(圖 / Colour 內頁)

COLOURCOLOUR


而藝術史上以「方形色塊組合」聞名的約瑟夫・亞伯斯(Josef Albers, 1888-1976),實踐了色彩的相對關係,留給世人近兩千幅名畫。他證明色彩的感受除了上面列舉的光、彩、反射、折射、視神經,也受到相鄰顏色的影響。他的正方形抽象畫上重疊著不同的色彩組合,在繁複的畫派裡獨樹一格。

1888年出生在德國的亞伯斯,1919年進入包浩斯當學生時已經31歲,但他畢業後就被延聘為青年大師(junior master)的職位,教授媒材運用,關於玻璃、紙張、木料、金屬,他都有研究;1922年女學生安妮(Anni Fleischmann, 1899-1994)進入包浩斯就讀,是紡織藝術類的。他們在1925年結婚,留在包浩斯繼續工作。能進入包浩斯當學生的都是已經在個別領域裡的熟手,包浩斯是一個融合教學、研究、設計和接案的地方,成品與收入歸於校方所有。因為希特勒政權施壓包浩斯,1933年學校關閉。亞伯斯夫婦轉任教於美國北卡羅萊納州的「黑山學院」(Black Mountain College),這是一個僅存24年(1933-1957)的藝術學院,養成了眾多當代藝術家。

+++++

Oskar Schlemmer1888.:The letters and diaries.  The theater of the Bauhaus. VISIONS OF A NEW WORLD 2014;Bauhaus Journal, okt.-dez. 1929

Rand Kehler  
Born on this day...Oskar Schlemmer September 4, 1888. In Stuttgart, Germany.
He was a German painter, sculptor, designer and choreographer associated with the Bauhaus school. In 1923, he was hired as Master of Form at the Bauhaus theatre workshop, after working at the workshop of sculpture. His most famous work is Triadisches Ballett (Triadic Ballet), which saw costumed actors transformed into geometrical representations of the human body in what he described as a "party of form and colour.
OSKAR SCHLEMMER:
Watercolor "THE DANCER" (1922)





圖書

The letters and diaries of Oskar Schlemmer

SchlemmerOskar, 1888-1943.
c1972.

Wikipedia 有 Oskar Schlemmer簡傳:

圖書

The theater of the Bauhaus

SchlemmerOskar, 1888-1943.
1996.




Image result for bauhaus journal 1929

Bauhaus Journal,okt.-dez.. 1929
cover page





























----https://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/distributed/O/bo20202296.html

Oskar Schlemmer

VISIONS OF A NEW WORLD

Oskar Schlemmer

11

Distributed for Hirmer Publishers

300 pages | 300 color plates | 11 1/4 x 11 1/2 | © 2014
Oskar Schlemmer (1888–1943) was one of the most versatile artists of the twentieth century. A member of the Bauhaus, Schlemmer created highly original works not only as a sculptor, draftsman, and graphic artist, but also as a stage designer, author, and creator of stunning dance works. Together, his projects articulated his vision of the “new” man, living in functional architecture, thinking and acting clearly in a modern age that would never again succumb to the chaos of war.
          
This beautifully illustrated catalogue accompanies the first comprehensive Schlemmer retrospective exhibition in nearly forty years. It presents more than 250 works—including the seven original costumes of Schlemmer’s epochal Triadisches Ballett—together with rare documents from the period. Essays draw important connections between all-encompassing efforts at reform and the work of the Bauhaus and discuss Schlemmer’s unsuccessful attempts to reconcile his “apolitical” art with Nazi ideas of state-controlled art. A landmark publication, Oskar Schlemmer: Visions of a New World makes a case not only for the artist’s continuing importance, but for the value of his lofty ethical goals for art as well.
Message of Welcome ~ Winfried Kretschmann
Message of Welcome ~ Axel Nawrath
Preface ~ Christiane Lange
Acknowledgements
Oskar Schlemmer—Visions of a New World ~ Ina Conzen
1906-1920 | Student and Scholar (Cat. 1-24)
1921-1929 | Oskar Schlemmer at the Bauhaus in Weimar and Dessau (Cat. 25-73)
1929-1933 | Teacher in Breslau and Berlin (Cat. 74-109)
1933-1943 | The ostracized Artist (Cat. 110-139)
Oskar Schlemmer as Wall Designer (Cat. 140-182) ~ Friederike Zimmermann
Oskar Schlemmer as Choreographer and Stage Designer (Cat. 183-224) ~ Karin von Maur
The New Man—Utopia and Ideology ~ Birgit Sonna
Arteries of World Literature—Schlemmer Reads. Schlemmer Writes ~ Wolf Eiermann
Oskar Schlemmer—The Well-known Stranger ~ Susanne M.I. Kaufmann
Catalogue of the Works on Display
Selected Bibliography
Index


 

Klee and Kandinsky at the Bauhaus (Christies)。幾本Wassily Wassilyevich Kandinsky (1866~1944)中文書. Murnau am Staffelsee 

Klee and Kandinsky at the Bauhaus
https://www.christies.com/features/Klee-and-Kandinsky-7441-3.aspx
有英文影片

Klee and Kandinsky at the Bauhaus

Specialist Jay Vincze looks at the highly influential period of the artists’ lives when they were neighbours, friends and colleagues at the Bauhaus — with a collection of works offered in our Impressionist & Modern Art Evening Sale on 22 June
For over 30 years Wassily Kandinsky and Paul Klee enjoyed one of the most fruitful and lasting friendships in modern art, working, exhibiting and living alongside one another during some of the most groundbreaking years of their careers.
The pair embarked on their artistic education in Munich in the early years of the 20th century, studying at the city’s academy of fine arts under the tutelage of the painter Franz von Stuck. But it was not until a decade later, in October 1911, that they would become acquainted. By this stage, the two were neighbours, living on the same street in the artists’ quarter of Schwabing. 

Wassily Kandinsky (1866–1944), Zersetzte Spannung, (Disintegrated Tension), 1930. Oil on board. 19 ¼ x 13 ¾ in. (49 x 35 cm.) Estimate £1,000,000–1,500,000. This work is offered in the Impressionist & Modern Art Evening Sale on 22 June at Christie’s in London

Wassily Kandinsky (1866–1944), Zersetzte Spannung, (Disintegrated Tension), 1930. Oil on board. 19 ¼ x 13 ¾ in. (49 x 35 cm.) Estimate: £1,000,000–1,500,000. This work is offered in the Impressionist & Modern Art Evening Sale on 22 June at Christie’s in London
Kandinsky recorded his first impressions of the young Klee in a letter to his close friend Franz Marc, explaining that ‘there is certainly something there in his soul’. Klee, meanwhile, noted in his diary: ‘Personal acquaintance [with Kandinsky] has given me a somewhat deeper confidence in him. He is somebody and has an exceptionally fine, clear mind.’ They discussed Kandinsky’s plans to establish a new society of artists and agreed to meet more often in the future.

Paul Klee (1879–1940), Zahlenpavillon (Pavilion of Numbers), 1918. Watercolour and pen and ink on paper laid down on the artist’s mount. 6 ⅜ x 3 ½ in. (16.3 x 8.9 cm.) Estimate £200,000–300,000. This work is offered in the Impressionist & Modern Art Evening Sale on 22 June at Christie’s in London

Paul Klee (1879–1940), Zahlenpavillon (Pavilion of Numbers), 1918. Watercolour and pen and ink on paper laid down on the artist’s mount. 6 ⅜ x 3 ½ in. (16.3 x 8.9 cm.) Estimate: £200,000–300,000. This work is offered in the Impressionist & Modern Art Evening Sale on 22 June at Christie’s in London
At this time Kandinsky left the New Artists’ Association of Munich, of which he had been a founding member, to establish The Blue Rider group with his friend Franz Marc. In his role as special correspondent for the Swiss periodical Die Alpen, Klee glowingly reviewed The Blue Rider exhibition in December 1911, reserving special praise for Kandinsky. Klee soon joined the group for their second exhibition in 1912, subtitled Black and White, in which he was represented by 17 drawings.

Wassily Kandinsky (1866–1944), Esquisse pour Autour du cercle, 1940. Oil on panel. 15 ½ x 23 ⅝ in. (39.4 x 60 cm.) Estimate £1,500,000–2,500,000. This work is offered in the Impressionist & Modern Art Evening Sale on 22 June at Christie’s in London

Wassily Kandinsky (1866–1944), Esquisse pour Autour du cercle, 1940. Oil on panel. 15 ½ x 23 ⅝ in. (39.4 x 60 cm.) Estimate: £1,500,000–2,500,000. This work is offered in the Impressionist & Modern Art Evening Sale on 22 June at Christie’s in London
Throughout the years immediately preceding the First World War, the older artist made introductions on Klee’s behalf, encouraging collectors such as Arthur Jerome Eddy to purchase the young artist’s work. But at the outbreak of war Kandinsky was forced to fee Germany as an enemy alien. Although the pair met briefly in Switzerland in the summer of 1914, they would not reconnect again for almost eight years. By this time, their professional fortunes had dramatically changed.
Klee was now a widely acclaimed painter, experiencing critical and commercial success across Europe. In 1921, he was invited by Walter Gropius to become a master at the Bauhaus in Weimar, which granted him a new degree of financial security and professional standing.

Wassily Kandinsky (1866–1944), Mit und Gegen (For and Against), 1929. Oil on board. 13 ¾ x 19 ⅛ in. (35 x 48.6 cm.) Estimate £2,000,000–3,000,000. This work is offered in the Impressionist & Modern Art Evening Sale on 22 June at Christie’s in London

Wassily Kandinsky (1866–1944), Mit und Gegen (For and Against), 1929. Oil on board. 13 ¾ x 19 ⅛ in. (35 x 48.6 cm.) Estimate: £2,000,000–3,000,000. This work is offered in the Impressionist & Modern Art Evening Sale on 22 June at Christie’s in London
Kandinsky, on the other hand, had been absent from the German art scene for a number of years, working on the reorganisation of the cultural establishment in Russia following the Revolution. After encountering the ideological limitations of the Constructivists, who rejected his subjectivism and spiritualism, he returned to Germany where he was, once again, the subject of fierce controversy. From Berlin he sent a letter to Klee at the Bauhaus, expressing his desire to see his old friend.
Just a few months later, Klee would assist Kandinsky and his wife in their move to Weimar, where Kandinsky joined the faculty of the Bauhaus. They came to know each other as colleagues and revived their tradition of exchanging small paintings and works on paper on each other’s birthdays and at Christmas.
When the Bauhaus moved to Dessau in 1926, they became neighbours again, living side-by-side in two semi-detached masters’ houses on the new Bauhaus site. Here they fell into an easy routine, working and teaching, socialising together with their wives, and taking long walks in the valley of the Elbe river.
With the rise to power of the National Socialists in 1933, Germany became a dangerous place for both artists to live
As they entered the 1930s, an increasingly complex and dangerous political climate in Germany ushered in a period of intense uncertainty and upheaval. Klee resigned from his Bauhaus position in 1931 to begin a new post at the Art Academy in Dusseldorf, while the dissolution of the school in Dessau in 1932 saw Kandinsky move to Berlin. However, with the rise to power of the National Socialists in 1933, Germany became a dangerous place for both artists to live.
Klee was dismissed from his teaching post by the authorities, and both he and Kandinsky were labelled ‘degenerate’ artists by the new government, who confiscated their works from public collections. Both fed the country, Klee moving to his hometown of Bern in neutral Switzerland and Kandinsky to Paris. They remained in contact during this time via regular letters.
Klee and Kandinsky saw each other for the last time in February 1937, when Kandinsky and his wife Nina travelled to the Swiss capital for the opening of a retrospective of his work at the Kunsthalle Bern. While there, they made a point of visiting Klee, who was largely housebound due to the debilitating illness that had plagued him since 1935. Kandinsky brought with him the watercolour Above-Below, which he dedicated ‘To my dear friend of many years’.
The two would remain close until Klee’s death in 1940, and Kandinsky continued to remember his friend in his writings for the rest of his life.




圖像裡可能有文字

幾本Wassily Wassilyevich Kandinsky (1866~1944)中文書








Vassily Kandinsky, Murnau am Staffelsee 

20th century[edit]

On the initiative of Emanuel von Seidls, the site of Murnau changed completely at the start of the 20th century. In 1908 two pairs of artists (Gabriele Münter[3] and Vassily Kandinsky;[4] and Marianne von Werefkin[5] and Alexej Jawlensky[6] stayed in Murnau at the same time to paint together.[7] Through their pictures of Murnau and its scenery, which they continued to paint until 1914, the market town became famous to a worldwide art audience. In the history of art, this period before the First World War is called the "Murnau Era".
This period is directly connected to these four artists and marks stylistically the development from expressionism to abstract art. Today, the Münter-Haus ("Russian House"),[8] where Münter moved in 1909 with Kandinsky, is one of the most prominent cultural attractions of Murnau; as is also the Castle Museum with its art collection.[9]





Wassily Kandinsky
Herbstlandschaft, 1911  
留言

Hanching Chung Kandinsky got at least two winter landscape with this perspective. I wonder where it is?

Colin Burrows Probably Murnau. Spent much time there at this time & produced many paintings of the town. Couldn't find any reference to this particular painting.🎶
Bauhaus: A Concept Model;女傑 Bauhausmädels. A Tribute to Pioneering Women Artists、男女學生比;Marianne Brandt - The Iron Lady
♂Mars symbol (U+2642 ). The symbol for a male organism or man.
♀Venus symbol (U+2640 ). The symbol for a female organism or woman.

Bauhaus  學生人數
    年                                     女        男
1919                                    101      104
1920                                      59        78
1921                                      44        64
1922                                      48        71
1923                                      35        106
1924                                      45          82
1925                                      28          75
1926                                      28          73
1927                                      41         125
1928                                      46         130
1929                                      58         143
1930                                      44          122
1931                                      53          141
1932                                      25           90
1933                                        5           14

----
Bauhaus 女傑,德文版多本,這是英文

Bauhausmädels. A Tribute to Pioneering Women Artists
NEW

Bauhausmädels. A Tribute to Pioneering Women Artists




Meet trailblazers like Marianne Brandt, Gertrud Arndt, and Lucia Moholy in Bauhausmädels—or “Bauhaus girls”, a term that expressed admiration for the young women who bravely eluded traditional gender roles to build a different future. With never-before-seen portraits and biographies, this is a unique celebration of the Bauhaus centennial and a long-overdue tribute to the school’s women artists.



----


Like sitting on air
Mart Stam Cantilever Armchair - 1926 without (S 33) and with armrests (S 34) These chairs are the first cantilever chairs in furniture history. They were used for the first time in 1927 in the Weissenhof-Siedlung in Stuttgart. Starting in 1925, Mart Stam experimented with gas pipes that he connected with flanges and developed the principle of cantilevering chairs that no longer rest on four legs. He thus created a construction principle that became an impo⋯⋯
 更多

圖像裡可能有1 人

Marianne Brandt - The Iron Lady

Marianna Brandt - German artist, sculptor, photographer and designer. The first and only woman who was admitted to the Bauhaus metal workshop, later taught in this workshop together with Laszlo Moholi Nadi, and in 1928 she headed it. Designed by Marianne Brandt household items are considered the forerunners of modern industrial design.


From memories M. Brandt

"... At that time I didn’t really like the painting they were doing there, and I didn’t feel that I could move in that direction. I was not at all interested in monumental painting, and in the textile workshop I didn’t like the atmosphere there. It would be interesting to do wood, but it required a lot of physical strength. In general, I discussed this issue with Moholi, and we decided that metal is what you need ... ... At first, they gave me all the most uninteresting, tedious and monotonous work It’s impossible to count how many hemispheres I patiently poke and, believing that the way it should, that the beginning is always difficult. But then everything will work out, and we became friends ... At that time we could not even dream about Plexiglas and other plastics. If we had them, it is unknown what other peaks we could reach. Well, in general, it’s good - after all, it’s necessary that those who come after us have something to do! ... "


"Bauhaus-style" - Brandt's programmatic response to Naum Gabo's skeptical article "Design?" ("Gestaltung?") In which Gabo calls the Bauhaus design superficial and anti-constructivist.

"... the author does not know us at all if he believes that we are trying to create a certain style, and that, for example, a round lamp was created solely because of admiring the pure forms of the sphere and cylinder. Today, we must start from the totality functional ideas, drawn from practical experience and our projects, which we repeatedly check and calculate. Of course, one cannot do without intuition and a general sense of balance ... yes, we make mistakes - this is inevitable, but every day they become less and less. .. "






















還有 9 張





Баувху/Bauwchu 在 Marianne Brandt - The Iron Lady 相簿中新增了 12 張相片。說這專頁讚


2015年7月18日


Marianna Brandt German artist, sculptor, photographer and designer. The first and only woman who was admitted to the Bauhaus metal workshop, later taught in thi⋯⋯


----



set up Ontos Weaving Workshops in Herrliberg, near Zurich, Switzerland, returned to become the weaving studio's technical director, replacing Helene Börner, and work with Georg Muche, who would remain the form master. Although she was not officially made a junior master until 1927, it was clear both the organization and content of the workshop were under her control. It was obvious from the start, the pairing of Muche and Stölzl was not enjoyed by either side, and resulted in Stölzl running the workshop almost single-handedly from 1926 onward.

The new Dessau campus was equipped with a greater variety of looms and much improved dyeing facilities, which allowed Stölzl to create a more structured environment. Georg Muche brought in Jacquard looms to help intensify production. He saw this as especially important now as the workshops were the school's main source of funding for the new Dessau Bauhaus. The students rejected this and were not happy with the way Muche had used the schools funds. This, among other smaller events, instigated a student uprising within the weaving department. On March 31, 1927, despite some staff objections, Muche left the Bauhaus. With his departure, Stölzl took over both as form master and master crafts person of the weaving studio. She was assisted by many other key Bauhaus women, including Anni Albers, Otti Berger and Benita Otte.

Stölzl began trying to move weaving away from its ‘woman’s work’ connotations by applying the vocabulary used in modern art, moving weaving more and more in the direction of industrial design. By 1928, the need for practical materials was highly stressed and experimentation with materials such as cellophane became more prominent. Stölzl quickly developed a curriculum which emphasized the use of handlooms, training in the mechanics of weaving and dyeing, and taught classes in math and geometry, as well as more technical topics such as weave techniques and workshop instruction. The earlier Bauhaus methods of artistic expression were quickly replaced by a design approach which emphasized simplicity and functionality.

Stölzl considered the workshop a place for experimentation and encouraged improvisation. She and her students, especially Anni Albers, were very interested in the properties of a fabric and in synthetic fibers. They tested materials for qualities such as color, texture, structure, resistance to wear, flexibility, light refraction and sound absorption. Stölzl believed the challenge of weaving was to create an aesthetic that was appropriate to the properties of the material. In 1930, Stölzl issued the first ever Bauhaus weaving workshop diplomas and set up the first joint project between the Bauhaus and the Berlin Polytex Textile company which wove and sold Bauhaus designs. 1In 1931 she published an article entitled “The Development of the Bauhaus Weaving Workshop”, in the Bauhaus Journal spring issue. Stölzl's ability to translate complex formal compositions into hand woven pieces combined with her skill of designing for machine production made her by far the best instructor the weaving workshop was to have. Under Stölzl's direction, the weaving workshop became one of the most successful faculties of the Bauhaus.





Marianne Brandt - Self portrait on mirrored sphere at Bauhaus Dessau - 1929

https://www.facebook.com/…/a.14484696521…/1471766016470168/…



看歐洲幾個電視台:法、英女子多走上街頭;德國電視台和訪問建築教授。多長得很好......

法國自稱是builder王國,其實,頭200年蓋好巴黎聖母院的,是"國際工人".....

20世紀1919~32的德國Bauhaus就是要發揮中世紀的"合作"精神。當時法國繪畫藝術強,驕傲,措失良機。


慶祝Bauhaus 90周年的書,很好,10年老書自有它的魅力。















Eugen Batz

The spatial effect of colours and forms, 1929/30

Tempera over graphite on black paper

30.2 x 32.9 cm

Bauhaus-Archiv Berlin

© VG Bild-Kunst, Bonn 2009










Bauhaus_ literally means “House of Building” or “Building School”. Back in 1919, in the town of Weimar in Thuringia - Germany the design revolution began. World renowned architect Walter Gropius established an academy to teach up-to-date ideas in color theory, painting, printmaking, pottery, industrial design, interior design, weaving and textiles, typography and graphic design. Nonetheless, despite the school’s name architecture was not taught; students who wished to be educated on building design were sent to work in Gropius’s private architecture office.




















Walter Gropius, 1928

in front of his design for the Chicago Tribune Tower of 1922

Photo: Associated Press, Berlin

Bauhaus-Archiv Berlin




















The Bauhaus Masters in 1926

(on the roof of the Bauhaus building, 4 December 1926)

left to right: Josef Albers, Hinnerk Scheper, Georg Muche,

László Moholy-Nagy, Herbert Bayer, Joost Schmidt, Walter Gropius,

Marcel Breuer, Wassily Kandinsky, Paul Klee, Lyonel Feininger, Gunta Stölzl, Oskar Schlemmer

Photo: unknown

Bauhaus-Archiv Berlin / Musée National d’Art Moderne / Centre Pompidou


Today, 90 years later all eyes are on Weimar, Jena and Erfurt as the crucial meeting points of the Bauhaus anniversary. The Bauhaus, was the most important and influential school of design of the 20th century despite the few years of its existence. Till present day the Bauhaus has had a long lasting impact on art, design, architecture and every day life, mostly because of the principle of form. Various classic and influential design objects of the 20th century were developed in Weimar during the Bauhaus from 1919 – 1925.




















Ludwig Mies van der Rohe, 1934

Photo: Werner Rohde

Bauhaus-Archiv Berlin




















Ludwig Mies van der Rohe

Contribution ‘Wabe’ (honeycomb) to the idea competition for the skyscraper at the Bahnhof Friedrichstrasse, 1922

Large photograph, supplemented by drawing

140 x 100 cm

Bauhaus-Archiv Berlin

© VG Bild-Kunst, Bonn 2009


For the occasion of the 90th anniversary of the Bauhaus, as of July 22nd – October 4th 2009 the Modell Bauhaus in Weimar is presenting the exhibition “Berlin // Martin - Gropius - Bau”, where it primary focuses on the early years of the world renown school of design. The aim of this exhibition is to portray Weimar as a laboratory where ideas and thoughts that were conceived subsequently reached a mature state deriving approval worldwide. The innovative approaches and impulse affected the world of design developed at the Bauhaus up till current day.




The exhibit will present well known and less known features of the Bauhaus were the assignments from the school workshops are presented as the highlights, as well as works of the Bauhaus masters. Over 900 objects from international collections will be exhibited including loans from collections of other museums.




















Wassily Kandinsky

Untitled (from the portfolio for Walter Gropius on his birthday, 18th May 1924), 1924

Black ink, water colours and opaque colours

19.6 x 22.5 cm

Bauhaus-Archiv Berlin

© VG Bild-Kunst, Bonn 2009




















Marcel Breuer (design and realisation)

Gerhard Oschmann (reconstruction)

Lady’s dressing-table from the Bauhaus experimental house “Am Horn”, Weimar, 1923 / 2004

168 x 126.5 x 48 cm

Photo: Hartwig Klappert, Berlin

Stiftung Bauhaus Dessau


Other events of the exhibition include a five day International Symposium “Global Bauhaus” which will take place on September 21st – September 26th, 2009 at the Martin-Gropius-Bau, Cinema and Stiftung Bauhaus Dessau. The Symposium will focus on the internationalization, the network character of the avant-garde and the migration paths of the Bauhaus and examine the major questions such as: How did the Bauhaus achieve such a world-wide influence and become an exemplary institution? Who were the multipliers of the Bauhaus idea? What does the Bauhaus stand for today? The speakers are worldwide leading architects, artists, design historians, art teachers and cultural scholars who have engaged in the research of the history and influence of the Bauhaus.























Walter Gropius

Work model for the memorial for the “March Heroes”, 1921

Klassik Stiftung Weimar

© VG Bild-Kunst, Bonn 2009




















Herbert Bayer

Design for the multi-media trade fair stand of a toothpaste manufacturer, 1924

Opaque colours, charcoal, coloured ink, graphite and collage elements on paper

54.6 x 46.8 cm

Harvard University Art Museums, Gift of the artist

© VG Bild-Kunst, Bonn 2009


Another interesting event which twenty lucky pupils from partner universities will participate in is the Bauhaus Summer School which will last eight to ten days in mid- September 2009 at Weimar – Dessau – Berlin. They will participate in seminars given by members of the Bauhaus institutions. Emphasis will be placed on the intimate encounter with ideas and artifacts of the Bauhaus at the original locations. To this end, they will be able to visit private homes and work with objects in the Bauhaus collection. The goal of this program is the support of international students in the area of Bauhaus research, the encounter of young people from different cultures, scholarly exchange of ideas and the intensification of project-oriented cooperation.




















Marcel Breuer

Club Chair B 3, 2nd version, 1926

Tubular steel, welded transitions and screwed plug and socket connections,

anthracite-coloured wire mesh straps

70.5 x 81 x 69.5 cm; seat 30 cm high;

steel tube diameter 22 mm

Photo: Hartwig Klappert, Berlin

Stiftung Bauhaus Dessau























László Moholy-Nagy

Light Space Modulator, 1922-1930

(1970 replica of the original in the Busch-Reisinger Museum)

Chrome-plated steel, aluminium, glass, plexiglass, wood, electric motor

Height 91 cm

Photo: Hartwig Klappert, Berlin

Bauhaus-Archiv Berlin

© VG Bild-Kunst, Bonn 2009



Баувху/Bauwchu說這專頁讚


4月14日下午11:04 ·


Alfred Arndt - colour plan for the exteriors of the Dessau Masters’ houses (3 semi-detached houses) - 1926



The   was supposed to be an equitable place. When   founded the progressive school in 1919, he called for an environment that treated art and design—as well as men and women—with the same level of respect. “Every eligible person whose talent and training are considered adequate will be accepted without regard to age and sex,” he wrote in the Bauhaus’s statutes.
The reality, however, wasn’t so utopian. Most of the institution’s workshops—which ranged from sculpture and furniture design to stained glass and metalwork—reinforced the era’s discriminatory gender roles. When prospective student Anni Weil applied to the architecture program in 1921, Gropius’s response was blunt: “It is not advisable, in our experience, that women work in the heavy craft areas such as carpentry and so forth,” he wrote. “For this reason a women’s section has been formed at the Bauhaus which works particularly with textiles.” Bauhaus painting master  ’s view of women was equally small-minded: “Where there is wool, there is a woman who weaves, if only to pass the time.”
Anni Albers, Originally produced by the Bauhaus Workshop. Orange, Black and White, 1926–27 (produced 1965). © The Josef and Anni Albers Foundation / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York. Courtesy of the Art Institute of Chicago.
Anni Albers, Originally produced by the Bauhaus Workshop. Orange, Black and White, 1926–27 (produced 1965). © The Josef and Anni Albers Foundation / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York. Courtesy of the Art Institute of Chicago.
Ethel Stein, White Pinwheel, 1990. © Ethel Stein. Courtesy of the Art Institute of Chicago.
Ethel Stein, White Pinwheel, 1990. © Ethel Stein. Courtesy of the Art Institute of Chicago.
Most women who entered the Bauhaus indeed ended up making textiles in the weaving workshop, Gropius’s “women’s section.” Despite the limitations imposed on them, artists like Gunta Stölzl,  , and Marli Ehrman made the weaving workshop not only the Bauhaus’s most commercially successful sector, but also one of its most collaborative and audaciously experimental. “Clearly this was a place of groping and fumbling, of experimenting and taking chances,” Albers remembered in 1947.
Together, these artists reinvented the formal and functional possibilities of thread, a pursuit that transformed both the future of textiles and of abstract art. After the Bauhaus shuttered in 1933 and Albers and Ehrman relocated to the U.S., they forged new communities of female artists intent on ushering textiles—a medium long dismissed as so-called “women’s work”—into the fine art canon. This fall and winter, “Weaving Beyond the Bauhaus,” an exhibition at the Art Institute of Chicago, maps both the weaving workshop’s exuberant spirit of experimentation and its far-flung influence on artists across generations, linking Albers to contemporary sculptor   and Ehrman to the likes of revolutionary fiber artist  .
Claire Zeisler, Free Standing Yellow, 1968. Courtesy of the Art Institute of Chicago.
Claire Zeisler, Free Standing Yellow, 1968. Courtesy of the Art Institute of Chicago.
The power of this show lies in its ability to connect innovation with collaboration. Across the exhibition, curator Erica Warren highlights not only the individual contributions of each artist, but also the mentorships and friendships that bolstered them. “Women supporting women”—to borrow a contemporary tagline—is its subplot. “I find that it’s really valuable to look at relationships between groups of artists,” Warren explained, “and the role that educational institutions, museums, galleries, and professional and personal affiliations play in bringing artists together and really impacting their practices. I wanted to tell a story about that.”
The story begins in the Bauhaus weaving workshop. In the school’s early years, there was little to no formal instruction in the weaving sector—students learned by playing with materials and bouncing ideas off of each other. “What I learned I learned from my co-students,” Albers remembered in 1968. “It was in a great muddle and there was a great searching going on from all sides…but it wasn’t that you went there and were taking something home from there. You were a contributor.”
Sheila Hicks, 1963. Courtesy of the American Craft Council Library and Archives.
Sheila Hicks, 1963. Courtesy of the American Craft Council Library and Archives.
This “great muddle” inspired great improvisation. Weavers fused loom weaving with hand weaving, and eschewed patterns in favor of making unexpected, undulating decisions on the loom—a process akin to painting on canvas without following a preparatory drawing (a method encouraged by Bauhaus painting instructor  ). They embedded cutting-edge, utilitarian materials like rayon and lurex into their work, too. For her thesis project, Albers created a new fabric that simultaneously reflected light and absorbed sound by joining cellophane and cotton.
Even after master weaver Gunta Stölzl became head of the workshop and began to establish a formal pedagogy, she encouraged artists to play with materials and tools on their own before demonstrating specific skills. She recognized this approach as “a way to unlock the potential of all of these really talented artists,” Warren explained.
Sheila Hicks, Produced by V’SOSKE, Rug, ca. 1965. Courtesy of the Art Institute of Chicago.
Sheila Hicks, Produced by V’SOSKE, Rug, ca. 1965. Courtesy of the Art Institute of Chicago.
Claire Zeisler, Hanging, 1950–91. Courtesy of the Art Institute of Chicago.
Claire Zeisler, Hanging, 1950–91. Courtesy of the Art Institute of Chicago.
When the Bauhaus closed due to decreased enrollment and increased pressure from the Nazi regime, Albers and Ehrman ferried these methods to the United States, where they posted up as instructors at progressive art schools. Albers landed at Black Mountain College in Asheville, North Carolina, while Ehrman found a post at  ’s New Bauhaus (later known as the Institute of Design) in Chicago. (Stölzl established a practice in Switzerland.)
The exhibition focuses on the lineage of American artists connected to Albers and Ehrman—in particular, the community of mostly female artists orbiting around Ehrman and her students in Chicago. Ehrman taught briefly at Black Mountain College and Chicago’s Hull House, but it was at the New Bauhaus where she wielded her greatest influence as the beloved instructor of some of the 20th century’s most innovative artists working with fiber—Else Regensteiner,  , and Tawney among them.
Claire Zeisler, 1972. Courtesy of the American Craft Council Library and Archives.
Claire Zeisler, 1972. Courtesy of the American Craft Council Library and Archives.
Ehrman’s students were so dedicated to her, as Janet Koplos and Bruce Metcalf point out in Makers: A History of American Studio Craft (2010), that when the school’s weaving workshop eventually closed, they incorporated themselves as the “Marli Weavers” to “preserve the spirit of the former class and to promote the study of handweaving and design.” In 1991, Regensteiner gushed: “Everything I have achieved during the fifty years of my career had its source in the Bauhaus philosophy and the guidance of Marli Ehrman.”
For her part, Regensteiner went on to found the design studio reg/wick with fellow New Bauhaus student Julia McVicker. There, they created custom fabrics for the likes of   and were included in the Museum of Modern Art’s watershed “Good Design” exhibition series (1950–55) alongside Ehrman, Albers,  , and others.
Zeisler took a more sculptural approach. She was one of the first to weave yarn into monumental, three-dimensional forms. “From the beginning [Zeisler] concentrated on extending the boundaries that limit weaving techniques,” pioneering Chicago gallerist Katharine Kuh, who represented many Bauhäusler and their successors, explained in a 1979 catalogue essay for Zeisler’s retrospective at the Art Institute of Chicago. “An inveterate innovator, she focuse[d] on three-dimensional and spatial possibilities, turning volatile fiber works into a new kind of sculpture.”
Lenore Tawney. Landscape, 1958. Alexander Demond Fund. © Lenore G. Tawney Foundation.
Else Regensteiner, Blue River I, 1963–64.
Else Regensteiner, Blue River I, 1963–64.
Lenore Tawney. Landscape, 1958. Alexander Demond Fund. © Lenore G. Tawney Foundation.
It is fellow New Bauhaus student Lenore Tawney, though, whose work reveals the most delightful connections between her community and her deeply innovative practice. Tawney not only studied with Ehrman, but also forged long-lasting friendships with Zeisler, Kuh, and artists   (who studied with  ) and Sheila Hicks (who met Anni Albers while studying at Yale and is one of the only artists included in the exhibition who is still living).
Like Zeisler, Tawney expanded the scale, density, and texture of woven artworks. “[She] was a very important pioneer in the field,” Zeisler said of Tawney in 1981. “[She] reached her peak before I had.” Tawney’s works were indeed unprecedented. She punctuated skeins of silk and cotton fibers with airy voids and natural objects like feathers, stones, and sticks, then suspended her towering constructions from the ceiling, as if floating. “All my work should be hung out from the wall, as space, or breathing, is part of it,” she stressed in 1982.
Somewhat unexpectedly, her practice also extended to collaged postcards and letters, which she sent to fellow artists and friends around the world, like Kuh and Stein, with whom she shared ideas. Several are included in the exhibition, and they feel like its crown jewels. One envelope to Stein incorporates materials Tawney used in her monumental works: a small feather and bits of found paper. More interestingly, though, are its contents: article clippings meant to inspire Stein, and a note of encouragement from Tawney scrawled in haphazard cursive. “Dearest Ethel,” she wrote, “I find these things do help. Love, Lenore.”
Nowhere in the show is Warren’s thesis more clear. Among these artists, formal experimentation was nourished by close relationships between women and the abiding support they offered one another. 
Alexxa Gotthardt is a contributing writer for Artsy.
https://www.artsy.net/article/artsy-editorial-women-weavers-bauhaus-inspired-generations-textile-artists?utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook&utm_campaign=editorial&fbclid=IwAR0Nk1xkYlw3-V4-h5WlgmUuHh_yKlBo55pU-s-kHt2QJXmGdUyxAi9fQyc

沒有留言:

網誌存檔