Christian nationalism基督教民族主義，美國基督教民族主義是一種政治意識形態和文化運動，它聲稱美國建國之初就是一個基督教國家，政府應該積極維護和弘揚這個特定的宗教認同。

 

美國基督教民族主義是一種政治意識形態和文化運動，它聲稱美國建國之初就是一個基督教國家，政府應該積極維護和弘揚這個特定的宗教認同。

核心信念：認同融合：將美國公民與原教旨主義新教或傳統基督教文化價值融合在一起。權力至上：優先考慮基督教的社會特權、制度主導地位以及與聖經原則相符的法律，而非世俗多元主義。

邊界維護：通常與保守的政治議程、限制性移民觀點和僵化的社會等級制度一致。

流行程度與人口統計：公眾支持：根據公共宗教研究所（PRRI）的數據，約32%的美國人被認為是基督教民族主義的信徒（11%）或同情者（21%）。

宗教和政治聯繫：白人福音派新教徒（66%）和經常參加教會活動的人群以及絕大多數自稱美國共和黨人的群體對基督教民族主義的支持率最高。

地理分佈分佈：信徒主要集中在南部和中西部各州，其中以阿肯色州、密西西比州和西維吉尼亞州等州最為集中。

社會影響：批評者和研究人員認為，該運動是對美國世俗憲法和宗教多元化的威權挑戰，並指出其與右翼政治極化以及重塑公共教育和法律機構的企圖密切相關。相反，支持者則認為，這是對傳統道德基礎抵禦日益高漲的世俗主義的必要捍衛。



Christian nationalism in the United States is a political ideology and cultural movement asserting that America was founded as a Christian nation and that the government should actively preserve and promote this specific religious identity. [1, 2]

Core Beliefs
Fusion of Identity: Merges American civic belonging with fundamentalist Protestant or traditional Christian cultural values. [1, 2]
Primacy of Power: Prioritizes Christian social privilege, institutional dominance, and legal alignment with biblical principles over secular pluralism. [1, 2]
Boundary Enforcement: Frequently aligns with conservative political agendas, restrictive immigration views, and rigid social hierarchies. [1, 2]

Prevalence and Demographics
Public Support: According to data from the Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI), roughly 32% of Americans qualify as either adherents (11%) or sympathizers (21%) of Christian nationalism. [1]
Religious and Political Ties: Support is highest among white evangelical Protestants (66%) and frequent church attendees, as well as a strong majority of self-identified U.S. Republicans. [1, 2]
Geographic Distribution: Adherence is most concentrated across states in the South and Midwest, led by states like Arkansas, Mississippi, and West Virginia. [1]

Societal Impact
Critics and researchers view the movement as an authoritarian challenge to the secular U.S. Constitution and religious pluralism, noting its correlation with right-wing political polarization and attempts to reshape public education and legal institutions. Proponents, conversely, view it as a necessary defense of traditional moral foundations against rising secularism. [1, 2, 3, 4]






PRRI