古典音樂台「音樂達文西」做了「基隆1626」的專題.....可以與聖十字若望(San Juan de la Cruz)的文字相呼應,〈在一場愛的追逐之後〉(Chiaheng Wu); 。ESPRIT(精神 1932~,哲學家保羅·利科曾多次與該雜誌合作。 《Esprit》是Eurozine網路的成員。)《充滿各種可能的列島》的台灣專號,含〈全球東方的台灣〉等等。。「Tout homme, sans exception, a le droit et le devoir de développer sa personalité.」(每個人,無一例外,都有權和義務發展自己的個性。)
我覺得可以與聖十字若望(San Juan de la Cruz)的文字相呼應,〈在一場愛的追逐之後〉(Tras de un amoroso lance)以打獵取譬,把上帝比為獵物,苦苦追尋,心念之熾烈,甚至不顧自身安危,願意閉上眼睛,縱身一跳,或是一步跨越千里。奇妙的是,在黑暗中反而看見真實,表達對上方或遠方的渴望,這是大航海時代西班牙人的心理狀態。被熱情所驅動。凡此皆脫離現實,難以用現實解釋,因而以「神祕主義」來描述。
Esprit is a French literary magazine. The magazine also deals with current events.[1] It is based in Paris.
History and profile
Founded in October 1932 by Emmanuel Mounier, it was the principal review of personalist intellectuals of the time.[2] From 1957 to 1976, it was directed by Jean-Marie Domenach. Paul Thibaud directed it from 1977 to 1989. Since 1989 Oliver Mongin has been the director of the magazine.[1] The philosopher Paul Ricœur often collaborated with it. Esprit is a member of the Eurozine network.[1]
Personalism and the non-conformists
In the 1930s, Esprit was the main mouthpiece of the Personalists and of the non-conformists of the 1930s. A presentation of the magazine by its authors in 1933 stated that it opposed the "compromission" (compromising) of spiritual values with the established order (which Mounier called "established disorder") and aimed at denouncing their "exploitation by the powers of Money, in the social regime, in the government, in the press, etc.[2]" Esprit opposed partial reforms and aimed at a global rebuilding of the basis of the social edifice. It targeted as opponents "individualistmaterialism", claiming that the "capitalist jungle was its ultimate product"; "collectivist materialism", which linked both Communism and Capitalism, despite their oppositions, in the "same metaphysics"; and the "false Fascistspiritualism," which seemed to share the same opponents, but in reality turned towards the "tyrannic idolatry of inferior spiritualities: racist exaltation, national passion, anonymous discipline, devotion to the state or the leader" or plain "safeguard of economic interests.[2]" The magazine posited itself for the "rebirth" of a "community of personalities," in opposing of both liberal individualism and collectivism, in one word, mass society:
"Tout homme, sans exception, a le droit et le devoir de développer sa personalité." (Every man, without exception, has the right and the duty to develop his personality.)[2]
「全球東方」(Global East / l’Orient global)的概念來自一小群都市地理學家,他們提出這個概念既是為了解構南北二元論,也是為了凸顯亞洲地區,特別是台灣、日本、韓國等亞洲社會對全球的影響力。對我來說,這個概念可以幫助我們換一個角度思考當前台灣在國際地緣政治中的位置,尤其是當台灣在面對已深陷混合戰爭泥淖的中國時,除了被視為護國神山的半導體和參與全球AI競賽之外,台灣人民還能如何重新定義自身在全球東方扮演的角色?根據我在大罷免失利後的田野觀察,答案可能在於一種頗具特色的新型態社會政治動員,當前在台灣各個地方如雨後春筍般自主發展行程的民防組織運動,便是一個絕佳的例證。(我把連結放在留言)
沒有留言:
張貼留言