2008年10月29日 星期三

《我(卞仲耘) 虽死去》王晶垚

文化社会 | 2008.10.28

是中国人都应该看的一部电影

科隆东亚系举办的中国纪录片节上,关于文革的纪录片《我虽死去》是其中最具有震撼力的一部影片。这部拍摄于两年前的纪录片其实应该成为中国人了解历史、了 解自己的一部经典影像教材,就像“文革博物馆”不应该只存在于呼吁中,而应该落成并成为反映中国现代史不可或缺的一面明镜。

科隆大学东亚系现代中国专业的大学生们10月23日至28日举办了一个"素颜中国-中国纪录片电影节",共放映了11部电影,其中除了最后 一部是剧情片"安子",其它10部都是纪录片。11部影片中,除了"北京798艺术工厂"为德国人弗里克制作,其它均为中国独立电影人作品。这些影片在中 国基本上属于"小众"电影,几乎不会在电影院里看到,因此能在德国看到,实在要感谢那几位组织了这一电影节的汉学专业德国学生。每晚放映前,都有一位学生 为观众介绍一下影片所涉及的历史与社会背景,从而使那些对中国不太了解的德国观众能更好地看懂影片。介绍《我虽死去》的那位德国小伙子说:"我相信今晚你 们没有白来,这是一部看了不会让你后悔的电影。"

《我虽死去》是独立电影人胡杰第二部关于文革中个人命运的纪录片,第一部《寻找林昭的灵魂》就已经引起很大反响。《我虽死去》讲述的是前北京师大女 附中党总支书记、副校长卞仲耘女士文革中被摧残致死的事件,影片的主要叙述者是卞仲耘的丈夫、今年已经87岁的王晶垚老先生。王晶垚老先生收藏了有关他妻 子遇害的大量历史证据,影片就是通过他的叙述、回忆和展示,重构了40前(影片拍摄于2006年)一个生命个体、一个家庭如何在人性丧失的疯狂时代被毁灭 的。

影片虽然是站在今天的位置回看历史,但采取的是黑白片的形式。编导胡杰应该更多的是出于对死者的尊重和对血腥的不忍再现,才采取了黑白两色,而不是 刻意营造一种历史片的效果。1966年8月5日,也就是毛泽东写出《炮打司令部--我的一张大字报》的著名历史一日,北京师范大学附属女子中学党总支书记 兼副校长卞仲耘在校内被造反的女学生活活打死,她也是文革中第一位遇害的教育工作者。学生打老师是文革的标志性暴力特征,因为它标志着对讲究"师道尊严" 的中国传统文化道德的根本性破坏。卞仲耘是被一群女学生用人格侮辱的方式活生生打死的,是什么把花季少女转眼变成如此残暴冷血?这是这部电影提出的一个没 有得到解答的问题,也是中国官方迄今回避和拒绝寻找答案的问题。

当时在中国社会科学院历史所做研究工作的王晶垚在妻子遇害后,用老式120相机拍摄了卞仲耘的尸体和丧事处理过程,也用照片记录了红卫兵抄家时贴在 他家里的语言下流恶俗暴戾的大字报。影片一开始就平静地展示出一幅卞仲耘半裸尸体的照片,效果却十分震撼。在那样的时刻还顾得上用心地摄记录惨不忍睹的一 幕幕,乍看上去王晶垚似乎有着超乎常人感情的克制与冷静。但是随着影片叙事的展开和深入,观众理解到,王晶垚在看到血淋淋的妻子尸体那一刻,心就已经在悲 恸中死去了,因此他是带着死而后生的勇气,直面痛苦,为历史为后人留下证据。卞仲耘在屈辱中暴死给老人留下了什么样的心理与心灵创伤,在影片中有一个镜头 表现得最清楚。王晶垚将胡杰的摄影镜头引向当年旧居的书房兼卧室,他指着窗口说,他在妻子遇害后的头几年,每天都盼望妻子熟悉的身影能出现在窗外楼下,就 像她活着的时候每年上班下班那样。说到这里,老人痛哭失声,一个85岁的老人的痛哭!

在王晶垚和死者的教师同事林莽老先生的回忆与陈述中,卞仲耘被屈辱虐待致死的细节过程渐次剥开。王晶垚将尘封了40年的箱子在镜头下展开,一件件晾 出妻子的遇害时粘满血迹和粪便的衣物和随身用品,那个在外力作用下变了形的手表的指针停在下午三点四十分,那是一个鲜活的个体生命被暴力无端扼杀的时刻, 那是一个家庭生离死别的时刻,那是一个人性扭曲畸形的时刻,那是中国被钉上历史屈辱十字架上的时候。这是他40年来第一次打开箱子。打开箱子,无异于撕开 伤口。曾经在学生时代就投身革命的知识分子王晶垚对着镜头说,妻子死后,本来是无神论的他开始对基督教的画像有了个格外的热爱和理解,他感觉身上背负了一 个十字架,背负着中国人承受的苦难和集体罪恶。他坚强地活下去,就是为去揭露这段历史。无独有偶,胡杰第一部文革纪录片中的林昭也是在生命的最后时刻称自 己是"为奉着十字架作战的自由志士"。人性的沦丧和宗教精神的缺失是否有某种必然的关联?看过胡杰的两部文革纪录片,就不能不去思考这一问题。

文革时北师大女子附中可谓是"贵族学校",学生中差不多有三分之一是中共最高层干部的女儿,毛泽东和邓小平的子女都曾在这里就学。2007年,北师 大附属实验中学,即原北师大女子附中举行90年校庆活动,当年红卫兵造反派头头宋彬彬为毛泽东献红卫兵袖章的照片被当成学校辉煌历史来炫耀,而这件文革象 征性事件发生在宋彬彬的校长被打死后两周,宋彬彬本人也是红卫兵暴行的主要责任人之一。最具有讽刺意味的是,校庆活动中,宋彬彬的照片和受难者卞仲耘的照 片一并刊登在《校史》和《图志》中,前者被冠以"知名校友"的荣誉光环,后者只被轻轻一笔带过。王晶垚老人给北师大附属实验中学校长袁爱俊写了一封抗议公 开信,但并没有得到任何回应。在胡杰拍摄这部纪录片时,当年的参与过施暴的女学生中没有一人愿意接受采访,时至今日更没有一名当年的女学生出面对卞仲耘之 死表示过道歉,与事件有关的责任人中更没有一人被追究过法律责任。

文革历史的伤痕并没有愈合。没有反省,没有忏悔,没有道歉,没有纪念,这就是中国对待文革的态度。凡是看过这部纪录片的人,肯定都会感到悲伤、愤 怒、无奈和迷惑。王晶垚老人执着探寻的是中国人的集体灵魂和良心,寻找的是正义和人性。然而,文革中失去的人性并没有真正回归,而没有人性回归的现代化, 必然是一个灵魂、情感和心智都不健全的现代化。从这个意义上说,《我虽死去》应该成为中国人必看的一部影像教材。被于丹通俗演义了一回的孔老夫子说过"不 知生,焉知死",其实这话反过来对今天的中国也许更有意义:不知千百万中国人是如何死去的,怎知现在的中国人是怎么活的?!

影片快结束时,老人表示要将他收藏的遗物和证据都交给文革博物馆。但文革博物馆在哪里呢?它什么时候能建成呢?它还会有机会问世吗?

2008年10月28日 星期二

Wu Mi-cha

吳密察

INTERVIEW/ Wu Mi-cha: Taiwanese nationalism a model for all of Asia

06/02/2008

THE ASAHI SHIMBUN

The following are excerpts from an interview with Wu Mi-cha, director of the National Museum of Taiwan History, about the 10 biggest incidents in modern and contemporary history in East Asia. This is part of a series to complement the "Impact of History--150 Years in East Asia."

* * *

The 10 biggest incidents I choose are:

1) The First Sino-Japanese War and Japanese colonization of Taiwan

2) Political, military and cultural impact of the United States on East Asia

3) China's reform and market opening

4) The Second Sino-Japanese War and the Pacific War

Events (5) to (10) are in chronological order.

5) The Opium Wars and the opening of China

6) Meiji Restoration and the opening of Japan

7) Japan's annexation of Korea

8) The Xinhai Revolution

9) The establishment of the People's Republic of China

10) The Korean War

* * *

Depending on whether you choose the 10 biggest incidents from the viewpoint of the national history of each East Asian country or that of East Asia as a whole, they could be different. Seen from the vantage point of East Asia as a whole, the incidents can be categorized into four major themes: 1) The collapse of the supremacy of the Chinese empire; 2) The establishment and collapse of the Japanese empire; 3) The establishment of U.S. supremacy; and 4) China's rise to power again.

But things look different when seen from Taiwan. The First Sino-Japanese War and the colonization of Taiwan are the most important. The war changed the East Asian power structure and led to the development and eventual collapse of the Japanese empire.

Up to then, Taiwan was not a state but as a result of the war, a powerful colonial government emerged there. To Taiwanese people, it was almost as if a modern state descended from heaven. But it was a modern state advocating colonialism.

The greatest developments in East Asia in the time leading up to the mid-20th century were the rise and fall of Japan and China. While remaining hostile, they had an impact on and learned from each other. In the second half of the 20th century, the United States entered East Asia as a third power. This was the Cold War order.

Since the second half of the 20th century, with the exception of resistance by the Arab world, virtually every country has been influenced by the United States. U.S.-led globalization has made the world more homogenized and convenient. But at the same time, it caused traditional local cultures to vanish. Young people who grew up eating at McDonald's do not know the taste of traditional local foods.

The rise of China is a major challenge that all of us living in the 21st century inevitably face. Due to its massive population and land area, the damage China could have on the global environment is significant. If it continues to build up its military, it will grow into a latent military power. Although the world is counting on China's future advancement, this could also become a burden the entire world would have to shoulder.

After the Manchurian Incident, Japan lost the power to control its expansion. If the Japanese empire had stopped at Manchukuo, it may not have collapsed as it did.

Why did Japan throw itself into the 15-year war? This is a question I cannot answer. The direction of the Greater East Asia Co-prosperity Sphere advocated by Japan was not entirely wrong in the sense that it was meant to counter the West. But the West was too strong and the Japan-led sphere was no match for it. Actually, Japan did not lose to China. It lost to the United States.

In writing modern Japanese history, postwar Japanese historians refer to the history of its four main islands, including Honshu. But I disagree. Setting aside the propriety of the matter, since Japan existed as an empire during the first half of the 20th century, historians should seriously come face to face with this fact.

Let me focus on East Asian nationalism. I think nationalism should be emphasized. But nationalism in this case is not the forcible and violent ideology that was advocated in the age leading up to the mid-19th century. Contemporary nationalism must be based on the reflection of modernism and be independent and fair, befitting the 21st century. This kind of nationalism could acquire a new name. I don't know when this can be realized, though.

I want Japan to respect the movement for Taiwan to create a new society on its own initiative. Japan should understand its 50 years of colonial relations with Taiwan and not remain indifferent to such efforts by Taiwan.

The East Asian community cannot come together as one as long as China acts like a big brother. Moreover, there are still grudges held from the past. Countries have attacked each other in an attempt to resolve internal contradictions within themselves. Only when members can share a Taiwan-style nationalism which is neither expansionist, militaristic nor imperialistic can they form a community.

* * *

Wu Mi-cha is professor of history at National Taiwan University and director of the National Museum of Taiwan History, which will officially open next year. He graduated from a University of Tokyo graduate school and is the author of books on Taiwan's history. (IHT/Asahi: May 30,2008)

2008年10月25日 星期六

Konosuke Matsushita 松下幸之助

ㄧ直沒空看電視來比較日本經營之神松下幸之助1905-89)之喪及其他層面……【紐約時報引AP之文半頁WEB PAGEKonosuke Matsushita, Industrialist, Is Dead at 94 則有數倍之篇幅專文….



Konosuke Matsushita, Industrialist, Is Dead at 94

Published: April 27, 1989

LEAD: Konosuke Matsushita, who rose from poverty to found the world's largest producer of home electric appliances and to become Japan's leading postwar industrialist, died this morning in Osaka, Japan. He was 94 years old.

Konosuke Matsushita, who rose from poverty to found the world's largest producer of home electric appliances and to become Japan's leading postwar industrialist, died this morning in Osaka, Japan. He was 94 years old.

Mr. Matsushita died in a hospital he founded. The cause of death was pneumonia, but he had been ailing for some time.

An orphan who became one of Japan's wealthiest men, Mr. Matsushita (pronounced mat-SOOSH-ta) started his business career as an entrepreneurial maverick not connected with the giant financial and industrial groups, known as zaibatsu, that dominated the Japanese economy in the prewar years. Model Emulated in West

Yet after the war, the former outsider came to symbolize the emergence of Japan as a more egalitarian, consumer-oriented society. His approach to business and managing people became a model emulated in Japan and widely studied in the West.

The Matsushita Electric Industrial Company, which Mr. Matsushita established in 1918, is often described as the prototype of clan-like corporations that have been the engines of Japan's postwar ''economic miracle.'' In tens of thousands of stores around the world, its products are sold under the brand names of Panasonic and National.

Mr. Matsushita started his company with one product - an electric light socket of his own design - three employees and capital of about $50.

Today, Matsushita Electric Industrial makes more than 14,000 products, ranging from electric batteries and rice cookers to video cassette recorders and computer chips. The company employs 120,000 people worldwide and had estimated sales last year of $42 billion. The Company as Family

Mr. Matsushita had a traditional businessman's belief in profit making. Yet one of his motivational insights -especially timely given Japan's economic straits and cultural turmoil after the war - was to inspire the total commitment by his workers to the company's goals by offering them not just material well-being, but also social meaning. ''People need a way of linking their productive lives to society,'' Mr. Matsushita once said. In his view, private companies, properly directed and run, could provide such a link. ''Profits should not be a reflection of corporate greed,'' he explained, ''but a vote of confidence from society that what is offered by the firm is valued.''

At Matsushita Electric, the devotion of the workers to the company is evidenced by the daily singing of the company song, the recitation of the company's seven ''spirutual'' values and, typically, taking less than half of one's allotted vacation days each year.

For its part in the reciprocal bond, the company not only guarantees lifetime employment, but also provides the workers with houses, gymnasiums, hospitals, schools and wedding halls. In fact, those who marry another Matsushita employee receive a cash bonus. Concept of Total Embrace

Matsushita personifies the Japanese employment system called ''marugakae,'' or total embrace. Recent social changes in Japan seem to have had little effect as yet on Masushita's close-knit corporate culture. However, there are signs that the younger generation of Japanese, who tend to be more individualistic in outlook than their parents, are generally less eager to link their values so closely with those of their employer. Similarly, many younger Japanese prefer higher wages to the package of benefits paternally provided by a company.

Indeed, during an interview at the company's Osaka headquarters in 1982, when Mr. Matsushita was 87 years old, he observed that even in Japan, communal interests seemed to be giving way to individual desires. ''People's actions are now too much arranged by self-interest,'' he said. ''This is the beginning of evil.''

The aged executive was small to the point of frailty; he was 5 feet 4 inches tall and weighed about 125 pounds. Throughout his life, Mr. Matsushita's daily regimen was abstemious. Forceful in Business

Though diminutive in stature, self-effacing in manner and soft-spoken, Mr. Matsushita was a forceful and articulate advocate of his views on a wide range of contemporary issues. During the 1982 interview, he dwelt on the problem of Japan's increasing trade frictions with the West because of its flood of exports, many of them the very products that Matsushita makes.

''After the war, we had nothing so we had to export to rehabilitate,'' he recalled. ''But Japanese industry cannot depend so much on exports in the future. In particular, we should not have so many 'hungry exports,' ones that hurt the workers of foreign countries. And we should collaborate more with other countries by building factories and creating jobs abroad.''

Mr. Matsushita practiced that philosophy. At the start of the 1980's, Matsushita began to build more plants in foreign nations to insure that an increasing share of its products sold abroad are also produced overseas. Japanese Horatio Alger Story

Born on Nov. 27, 1894, Mr. Matsushita's life and business career have the elements of a Japanese Horatio Alger story. His parents and five of seven siblings died when he was a child, leaving him to fend for himself. To survive, he got a job at 9 as an errand boy.

Even at an early age, Mr. Matsushita displayed an independent-mindedness that tends to be rare in Japan. At the age of 16, he left his job as an apprentice bicycle repairman to work for the Osaka Electric Light Company.

Eight years later, he deserted a steady job as a wiring inspector to start his own business. His first try with a light socket he designed was a failure. To make ends meet, he had to pawn his wife's kimono. Attachment Plug a Success

But he had more success with his next effort, an electric attachment plug that sold for 30 percent less than the competitors' products. With that, the fledgling entrepreneur was on his way.

Yet Mr. Matsushita was known more for being an imaginative merchandiser than an inventor. For example, when shopkeepers refused to believe that his battery-powered bicycle lamp could shine continuously for 30 hours, he placed one in each one of the skeptic's stores and turned it on. Soon, the bicycle lamp was a big seller.

Mr. Matsushita once explained that his business hero was Henry Ford, who brought the automobile to millions of ordinary citizens.

During World War II, Mr. Matsushita's plants were drafted into the war effort. Near the end of the war, the military came to him and told him to make wooden training planes. ''When they came to me to manufacture airplanes,'' he said, ''I knew things were hopeless.''

After the war, the United States occupation at first grouped Matsushita with the zaibatsu, industrial combines with links to the military, and marked the company for dissolution as part of the democratization. Workers Helped Save Company

To stop the breakup of their company, delegations of Matsushita workers traveled to Tokyo to plead with the occupation authorities that their boss was not one of the industrialists imbued with militarism who pushed Japan into war. After three years of entreaties, Matsushita was taken off the purge list.

By the late 1950's, with Japan's recovery well under way, Matsushita was the main supplier of the ''three treasures'' that every Japanese household desired and increasingly could afford: a washing machine, refrigerator and black-and-white television. 'Fill the World With Products'

A man given to philosophical pronouncements, Mr. Matsushita once explained his life's mission: ''I watched a vagrant drinking tap water outside somebody's house and noticed that no one complained about it,'' he said. ''Even though the water was processed and distributed, it was so cheap that it didn't matter. I began to think about abundance, and I decided that the mission of the industrialist is to fill the world with products and eliminate wants.''

Mr. Matsushita was far more than a charismatic leader and an aggressive merchandiser. His flexibility was his particular genius, enabling his company to make the transitions necessary to become a major industrial enterprises.

Though he had little formal education, Mr. Matsushita studied broadly, particularly foreign business practices. Sometimes borrowing and at other times using home-grown tactics, he installed at Matsushita elements of the modern corporation.

Explaining the changes in his own approach, Mr. Matsushita said, ''When you have 100 employees, you are on the front line and even if you yell and hit them, they follow, but if the group grows to 1,000, you must not be on the front line but stay in the middle. When the organization grows to 10,000, you stand behind in awe and give thanks.''

2008年10月24日 星期五

Greenspan, once more 格林斯潘蒼然走下神壇

The Washington Post leads with the lashing that lawmakers delivered Alan Greenspan, the man who was once referred to as "the Oracle" on the economy. Angry lawmakers trampled over themselves to blame the former Federal Reserve chairman for the current crisis and criticize decisions Greenspan made during his 18-year tenure.

美國前聯邦儲備局局長格林斯潘承認,他賴以執行美國貨幣政策十八年的主導思想:自由市場概念,在全球經濟危機中給暴露了"錯誤"。
《衛報》的頭條標題說:"格林斯潘 - 關於經濟,我錯了,大約是這樣。"
格林斯潘長期反對監管,但是昨天他在美國國會委員會上說在他對銀行業採取的放任政策方面,他有"部分錯誤"。 報道說,格林斯潘被讚譽為戰後最長期繁榮的策劃者,這是他首次承認在席捲全球銀行系統的危機中曾經犯錯。

《國際先驅論壇報》的頭條標題說:"格林斯潘罕見地承認失誤"。 格林斯潘今年面對著越來越大的批評,因為他曾經力抗對信貸衍生工具的管制,這個沒有管理的市場是造成目前經濟危機的部分原因。


Greenspan Admits Errors To Hostile House Panel

2008年10月24日13:40
Alan Greenspan, lauded in Congress while the economy boomed, conceded under harsh questioning from lawmakers that he had made mistakes during his long tenure as Federal Reserve chairman that may have worsened the current slump.

In a four-hour appearance before the House Oversight Committee Thursday, Mr. Greenspan encountered legislators who interrupted his answers, caustically read back his own words from years ago, and forced him to admit that, at least in some ways, his predictions and policies had been wrong.

Returning to Capitol Hill amid a financial crisis rooted in mortgage lending, Mr. Greenspan said he had been wrong to think banks' ability to assess risk and their self-interest would protect them from excesses. But the former Fed chairman, who kept short-term interest rates at 1% for a year earlier this decade, said no one could have predicted the collapse of the housing boom and the financial disaster that followed.

Lawmakers weren't buying his explanations. 'You had the authority to prevent irresponsible lending practices that led to the subprime-mortgage crisis. You were advised to do so by many others. And now our whole economy is paying its price,' said Rep. Henry Waxman (D., Calif.), chairman of the House committee.

Lawmakers read back quotations from recent years in which Mr. Greenspan said there's 'no evidence' home prices would collapse and 'the worst may well be over.'

Mr. Greenspan said he made 'a mistake' in his hands-off regulatory philosophy, which many now blame in part for sparking the global economic troubles. He conceded that he has 'found a flaw' in his ideology and said he was 'distressed by that.' Yet Mr. Greenspan maintained that no regulator was smart enough to foresee the 'once-in-a-century credit tsunami.'

The hearing made clear how far the 18-year central banker's reputation had fallen from the days when he was hailed for his stewardship in keeping inflation low, holding growth up and helping pull the world through financial crises, including the Asian and other turmoil a decade ago.

Two and a half years after Mr. Greenspan left office, Congress is drawing plans to remake global financial regulation with the kind of tight government hand that he long opposed. At the same House hearing, Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Christopher Cox, himself a longtime free-market Republican, said he supported merging his agency with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, creating a beefed-up supercop to police certain previously unregulated financial products.

Amid the barrage of questions, Mr. Greenspan dodged and weaved. He would begin meandering responses in the elaborate phraseology that once served him so well, only to be cut off as lawmakers sought to use their brief question time for sharper attacks.

Echo of Watergate

In an echo of the Watergate hearings 35 years ago, Mr. Greenspan was asked when he knew there was a housing bubble and when he told the public about it. He answered that he never anticipated home prices could fall so much. 'I did not forecast a significant decline because we had never had a significant decline in prices,' he said.

Mr. Greenspan's confidence in the resilience of home prices -- shared by most in the industry at the time -- became a critical forecasting error. The belief spurred more mortgage underwriting because lenders assumed that borrowers living on the edge could always refinance or sell their homes for a profit if they ran into trouble. Instead, with home prices now falling, hundreds of thousands of homeowners are facing foreclosure. Prices nationwide have fallen nearly 20% since their 2006 peak, and many economists foresee a further decline of 10% or more in the next year.

The difficulties of forecasting served as a key defense for Mr. Greenspan. The Federal Reserve, with its legions of Ph.D. economists, has a better forecasting record than the private sector, he said, but that's still not enough to prevent every problem. 'We were wrong quite a good deal of the time,' he said. Forecasting 'never gets to the point where it's 100% accurate.'

Subprime mortgages led to a global economic crisis in considerable part because of securitization, in which the home loans were sliced up, packaged into securities and sold off to investors all around the world. Anticipating such a crisis is 'more than anybody is capable of judging,' Mr. Greenspan said.

If the best experts were not able to foresee the development, 'I think we have to ask ourselves, 'Why is that?'' Mr. Greenspan said. 'And the answer is that we're not smart enough as people. We just cannot see events that far in advance.'

He continued, 'There are always a lot of people raising issues, and half the time they're wrong. The question is what do you do?'

Lawmakers, stung by having to put $700 billion of taxpayer money on the line to rescue the financial system, were unmoved throughout the hearing, and eager to make their own points about the situation.

The former Fed chief also said he was often following the 'will of Congress' during his long tenure and did 'what I was supposed to do, not what I'd like to do.'

Mr. Greenspan has spent much of this year defending his record at the Fed, trying to take apart arguments to show how his decisions were far less significant than outside forces in causing the crisis.

The central bank is blamed for too vigorously spurring home buying through its low short-term interest-rate targets, which were initially set to fight the economic slump after the dot-com bubble burst in 2000-01. Mr. Greenspan maintains that a global savings glut was largely responsible for low rates -- around the globe and not just in the U.S. -- contributing to a housing boom that was world-wide.

Lawmakers took Mr. Greenspan to task for his advocacy of credit-default swaps, an unregulated kind of insurance contract that can help investors protect themselves against another party's bankruptcy. Credit-default swaps were also used as a way of taking risks and are widely blamed for adding to financial-market instability. Rep. Waxman asked pointedly, 'Were you wrong?'

Mr. Greenspan said, 'Partially.' While he cautioned the lawmakers against excessive regulation, he said credit-default swaps 'have serious problems' and, after some pointed questions, agreed they should be subject to oversight.

The treatment was a striking contrast with one of Mr. Greenspan's last appearances before Congress as Fed chairman, on Nov. 3, 2005. 'You have guided monetary policy through stock-market crashes, wars, terrorist attacks and natural disasters,' Rep. Jim Saxton (R., N.J.) told him then. 'You have made a great contribution to the prosperity of the U.S. and the nation is in your debt.'

Kara Scannell / Sudeep Reddy




格林斯潘承認曾錯估金融形勢

|
2008年10月24日13:40
林斯潘(Alan Greenspan)在國會議員們的嚴辭質詢下承認,他在長期擔任美國聯邦儲備委員會(Fed)主席期間犯過錯誤,而這些錯誤可能加劇了目前的經濟蕭條。這與經濟繁榮年代格林斯潘在國會受到的推崇大相徑庭。

Getty Images
周四格老在眾議院監管委員會召開的聽証會上作証
周四在眾議院監管委員會(House Oversight Committee)歷時4個小時的聽証會上,議員們不時打斷格林斯潘的應答,語帶挖苦地復述他幾年前的言論,並強迫格林斯潘承認,他當年的預判和政策至少在某種程度上是錯誤的。

發 端於按揭貸款的這場金融危機使格林斯潘重返國會山,他對議員們說,自己當年曾錯誤地認為銀行有能力評估其所面臨的風險,而它們出於自身利益的考慮也會避免 濫放貸款。但格林斯潘同時表示,沒人能夠預見到房市繁榮的戛然而止以及緊隨其後的金融災難。他在擔任Fed主席期間曾於本世紀初將美國短期利率保持在1% 的水平達一年之久。

但議員們並不買他這番解釋的帳。眾議院監管委員會主席、加州民主黨人亨利﹒魏克斯曼(Henry Waxman)對格林斯潘說,你當時有權防止導致次貸危機的不負責任放貸行為的發生,許多人都曾建議你這麼做,而現在整個美國經濟都在為此付出代價。

議員們還復述了格林斯潘近年來一些講話的片斷,比如格林斯潘曾說“沒有証據”顯示房價將會暴跌,“最壞的時候可能已經過去。”

格 林斯潘說,他在貫徹自己不涉主義監管哲學方面“犯了個錯誤”,許多人現在認為這種監管手法一定程度上引發了當前的全球性經濟困局。格林斯潘承認,他已察 覺這一監管思想“存在問題”,他“為此感到難過”。但格林斯潘堅持認為,沒有哪個監管者能聰明到預見這一“百年一遇的信貸海嘯”。

這次聽証會清楚地表明,與他執掌Fed的那18年相比,格林斯潘的聲譽現在已經跌落到了何種地步。人們當時紛紛盛讚他將通貨膨脹率控制在了低水平,維持了經濟增長,並幫助全世界渡過了一次次金融危機,比如10年前發生在亞洲和世界其他地方的金融動盪。

在 格林斯潘離開Fed兩年半後的今天,國會正著手制定重塑全球金融監管體系的各項計劃,新體系的一大特色就是政府要加強對市場的預,而這正是格林斯潘一貫 反對的。美國証券交易委員會(SEC)主席考克斯(Christopher Cox)在出席此次聽証會時表示,他支持讓SEC與美國商品期貨交易委員會(CFTC)合並,組建一個規模更大的超級監管機構,從而能對某些以往未受監管 的金融產品實施監督。考克斯本人一直是持自由市場觀點的共和黨人。

面對議員們洶湧而來的質詢,格林斯潘極盡閃轉騰挪之能事。他一開始又想以字斟句酌式的措辭對議員們的詢問娓娓作答,這種應答方式當年曾使他顯得那麼遊刃有,但議員們卻不理他這套,他們為了能在有限的提問時間內對格林斯潘發起更猛烈的攻擊,粗暴地打斷他的話。


水門事件再現


聽証會的氣氛使人回想起35年前的水門事件國會聽証。格林斯潘被問到他何時知道存在著住房泡沫以及他又是何時告知公眾這一點的。格林斯潘回答說,他從沒料到房價會跌成這樣。格林斯潘說:我沒有料到房價會大幅下跌,因為房價從來沒有這麼嚴重下跌過。

格 林斯潘對房價彈性的信心成了關鍵的預判錯誤,不過當時業內大多數人士都這麼認為。這種信心帶來了更多的按揭承銷交易,因為貸款機構認為,如果捉襟見肘的借 貸人陷入困境,總可以獲得再融資或者賣房子獲利。然而隨著房價的不斷下跌,有數十萬貸款購房者面臨止贖。全美房價已經較2006年的峰值回落了將近 20%,許多經濟學家預計明年房價還會再跌10%甚至更多。

格林斯潘把預測的困難當作主要擋箭牌。他表示,擁有大批經濟學博士的Fed的預測準確性紀錄一直強於私人部門,但仍然做不到萬無一失。格林斯潘說,我們這次預測的確太偏離實際了。預測“永遠達不到百分百的準確度”。

次級抵押貸款引發了全球性經濟危機在很大程度上是因為証券化產品的問題;住房貸款在証券化過程中被分拆打包成証券產品,再出售給遍布全世界的投資者。格林斯潘辯白道,預測這樣一場危機超過了任何人的判斷能力。

格林斯潘說,如果最好的專家都沒有能力預見到事態發展,我想我們該問問自己“為什麼會這樣?”。答案是我們還不夠聰明,我們預見不到那麼遠的事情。

他說,總是有很多人會提出問題,半數時間他們都是錯的。問題是你能做什麼?

國會議員們在整場聽証會中始終不為所動;他們對不得不投入7,000億美元的納稅人資金來救助金融體系大為光火,急切地想說明他們自己的觀點是對的。

格林斯潘還表示,自己在執掌Fed的多年時間裡經常遵從“國會的意願”,做了“自己被認為該做的事,而不是自己想做的事。”

今年許多時候,格林斯潘都在為自己統領Fed時期的決策辯護,竭力地想辯白外部因素才是引發危機的主要因素,自己的決策次要得多。

外 界怪罪Fed此前將短期利率目標降的太低,從而過度刺激了美國的購房熱潮;Fed調降利率最初是為了阻止美國經濟在2000-2001年網絡股泡沫破滅後 出現下滑。格林斯潘堅稱,全球儲蓄資金充裕(這不僅是美國問題,更是全球范圍內的普遍現象)是利率在低水平徘徊的主要原因,進而引發了全球性的住房熱潮。

議員們還指責格林斯潘支持信用違約掉期產品;這是一種不受監管的保險合約,可以幫助投資者防范對方破產的風險。信用違約掉期還被用做一種風險投機手段,被普遍認為加劇了金融市場的波動性。魏克斯曼直言不諱地問道:“你是不是錯了?”

格林斯潘回答道,“部分是吧”。盡管他就過度監管的危害向議員們提出了警告,他承認信用違約掉期存在著“嚴重問題”;在一些尖銳的問題之後,格林斯潘同意應當對這類產品實施監管。

格 老此番遭遇與2005年11月3日他之前最後一次在國會露面有天壤之別,當時的格老還貴為Fed主席。新澤西州共和黨眾議員薩克斯頓(Jim Saxton)當時恭維道,您引領著美國貨幣政策走過了股災、戰爭、恐怖襲擊和自然災害。您為美國的繁榮作出了巨大貢獻,整個國家都感謝您。

Kara Scannell / Sudeep Reddy

2008年10月23日 星期四

DAVID POGUE Interviewed E.O. Wilson

By DAVID POGUE

This past Sunday, "CBS News Sunday Morning" aired my report on the Encyclopedia of Life project. (I'm campaigning hard for them to post the segment online.)

As usual, putting this story together involved conducting a number of interviews, which were fascinating--but I had time to use only a few sentences of each one in the finished story. It always seems such a shame to let the rest of these interviews go to waste. '



E.O. Wilson





So today, I offer a much longer version of my interview with E.O. Wilson (friends call him Ed), the two-time Pulitzer Prize winner, naturalist and Harvard research professor who's the father of the Encyclopedia of Life.

DAVID POGUE: So how did this project come about?

DR. E.O. WILSON: I've been in systematics and the mapping of biological diversity all my life. And a little more than ten years ago, I thought the time had come to undertake a complete mapping of the world's fauna and flora.

Because remarkably--and this is little known even in the scientific community--we've only begun to explore this planet. It was 250 years ago this year that Karl Linneus, the great naturalist in Sweden, began what became the official form of biological classification: two names, like "homo sapiens" for us, and ranging the species in hierarchies according to how much they resemble one another. 250 years ago.

And in that period of time, we have found and given names to perhaps one-tenth of what's on the surface of the earth. We have now found 1.8 million species. But the actual number is almost certainly in excess of 10 million, and could be as high as a hundred million, when you throw in bacteria.

Let me give you an example. Fungi. The world depends on fungi, because they are major players in the cycling of materials and energy around the world. They're necessary for the health of other organisms. (We should get rid of the idea that fungi are what gives you athlete's foot...feet.) Some 60,000 species are known, and it's been estimated by experts that more than 1.5 million exist. So we've just begun to explore it. And that's true, group after group. We're just beginning.

For a period of time, I was a voice in the wilderness, with a few others, wandering around and trying to raise a lot of money, unsuccessfully, saying, "You know, we need to bulk up the exploration of the planet, the living part." And finally, in 2003, I wrote a paper called "The Encyclopedia of Life." And I said, "What we need is to get out there and search this little-known planet, and then put all the information that we get on species already known into a single great database, an electronic encyclopedia, with a page that's indefinitely extensible for each species in turn, and that would be available to anybody, any time, anywhere, single access, on command, free."

We were about to enter the age of Google. We were about to enter an age where, technically, we could have everything available to everybody all the time.

So I published that article and began to promote it. And some others picked up on it. The key, however, was the warm reception made to it by the MacArthur Foundation. [The MacArthur and Sloan foundations eventually contributed $12 million to launch the project. Later, Dr. Wilson also won the TED Prize, which brings with it $100,000 and, more importantly, a lot of exposure and contacts to help three visionaries each year make their wishes come true.]

DP: And what do you say to people who think, "Oh. Oh, how interesting. A database for scientists." I mean, is there a greater purpose to a Web site like this?

EOW: The public will have this unlimited encyclopedia, where it can browse [at eol.org]. Where individual students can do their own research projects. Where you can make your own field guide wherever you're going. It will tell you what the butterflies are of Oregon, or maybe you're hoping to make a trip to Costa Rica and the whole family would like to see turtles. In time, you'll be able to do this with a few keystrokes.

DP: So I understand that the Encyclopedia will operate Wikipedia-style, with contributions from the public, which are then approved by experts?

EOW: The world is full of amateurs: gifted amateurs, devoted amateurs. You can pick almost any group that has any kind of intrinsic interest in it, from dragonflies to pill bugs to orb-weaving spiders. Anybody can pick up information in interesting places, find new species or rediscover what was thought to be a vanished species, or some new biological fact about a species already known, and can provide that right into The Encyclopedia of Life.

DP: Haven't there been previous attempts to catalogue every species in the world?

EOW: Yes, there have been several. And if you have access to one of the great libraries and a LOT of time, you can, with great effort, pull out everything known about every species. But it would take an army actually to get all the information on all species, all 1.8 million species and on beyond, around the world.

For example, 30 feet from where we sit is the largest ant collection in the world. One million specimens, 6,000 species, and it's a wonderful resource. [DP notes: This collection represents Wilson's own life's work.]

But any scientist who wants to utilize this collection--and that's most of them who are doing research on ants--have to come here [to my department at Harvard]. But when The Encyclopedia of Life receives all the information that we have, like the superb photographs and basic data on the species, just a few keystrokes away, it'll be possible to do high-level, cutting-edge, real-time research, wherever you are.

Simultaneously, to speed things along even more, the Biodiversity Heritage Library Initiative has set out to scan and make available maybe 500 million pages published all through time, on all species. [They are literally scanning thousands of books and journals, converting the scans to text, and making it all available to the Enyclopedia of Life.] I just got a letter from one of the leaders of this who said, "We've just passed the eight million mark."

DP: It sounds like this is going to be a major world resource. How is it gonna pay for itself? Are you gonna sell ads?

EOW: This project has to pay for itself. We got our break through the MacArthur and Sloan Foundations to get started. But now we have to pick up funds to expand it to anything near completion.

And right now, I don't have an idea of what that will take in funding. But I'm pretty sure of one thing. It's not going to cost more than the Human Genome Project, because it's way ahead. And it's gonna cost a lot less than our space programs--a lot less. In fact, if we could have a small fraction of one of a space program budget alone, we would see this project go way fast into the future.

It's a scientific moon shot--big science. But I think it's gonna turn out to be one of the least expensive. It doesn't take a lot of high technology to discover species and work out their characteristics.

DP: Is there a larger purpose to The Encyclopedia of Life?

EOW: Oh, yeah. The Encyclopedia of Life is absolutely vital in saving the environment. Because we're losing the vast percentage of species; we are losing them. Whenever we focus on a particular group, whether it's birds, frogs, whatever, we can just see them disappearing. So what happens among all these other groups, from beetles to ants to bacteria to fungi and so on? You know full well that they're disappearing, too. But we don't even know what's disappearing. And we don't know how to save most of them. And we don't know how this is going to affect the environment.

We need to have this information, this great database, in order to plan strategies that are maximally efficient, cost the least, square kilometer by square kilometer around the world, and save the most. And we can't do that without a thorough knowledge of what we're trying to save.

Listen: What would thrill people the most about space exploration? Surely it would be the discovery of life on another planet.

Then, Congress, if it weren't busted, would be willing to put out billions to explore that planet--find out all of the life forms there. Why shouldn't we be doing the same for planet earth? It's a little-known planet. Ninety percent of the life forms unknown to us.

And this is gonna be fun. This is a return to exploring a little-known planet.

DP: What is your involvement with The Encyclopedia of Life these days?

EOW: Here at Harvard, I've started a part of The Encyclopedia of Life effort: the Global Ant Project. I've obtained the funds. We've just had a meeting of ant specialists from around the country.

DP: That's gotta be a party.

EOW: Yeah, it was. (LAUGHTER) The word for them is myrmecologists. And believe me, this was an exciting but, I have to admit, idiosyncratic clan meeting. (LAUGHTER)

And for a skeptical audience who says, "Well, how could studying ants be very important?" Well, let me tell you, ants are the dominant insects. They make up as much as a quarter of the biomass of all insects in the world. They are the principal predators. They're the cemetery workers. Ants are the leading removers of dead creatures on the land. And the rest of life is substantially dependent upon them.

In many environments, take away the ants and there would be partial collapses in many of the land ecosystems. Take away humans, and everything would come back and flourish. But I don't wanna go down that down that road for a broad audience. (LAUGHTER)

DP: I'm just curious: when you see an ant in the kitchen…Has your life's work caused you to reach a point where you wouldn't just stomp on it?

EOW: Oh, no. (LAUGHTER) I've slaughtered more ants in my life than possibly any living person. Whole colonies.

DP: What is your sense of The Encyclopedia of Life's likelihood of success?

EOW: Likelihood of success? Certain. Challenges? Large. Some unknown. But right now, those that can be imagined don't seem to be insoluble. It won't take a huge amount of funding. It'll be relatively a small "big science" effort. No. I think this whole effort has a great future.

DP: So you don't see it being derailed by people leaving, or money running out, or--

EOW: What's to derail? I mean, we're not talking about the Hadron Collider, with people standing outside, wringing their hands thinking that the Earth will disappear into a black hole. We're not talking about religious believers trying to put the stop on the stem cells. We're talking about finding out about life on a little-known planet and making full use of that knowledge.

An Invented Life: Reflections on Leadership and Change

An Invented Life: Reflections on Leadership and Change by Warren Bennis. 238 pgs.


Table of contents

Contents

Foreword ix

Preface xiii

An Invented Life: Shoe Polish, Milli Vanilli and Sapiential Circles 1

Is Democracy Inevitable? 37

The Wallenda Factor 57

The Coming Death of Bureaucracy 61

The Four Competencies of Leadership 75

Managing the Dream 87

False Grit 95

On the Leading Edge of Change 103

Searching for the Perfect University President 109

When to Resign 141

Followership 157

Ethics Aren't Optional 161

Change: The New Metaphysics 165

Meet Me in Macy's Window 173

Corporate Boards 183

Information Overload Anxiety (and how to overcome it) 193

Our Federalist Future: The Leadership Imperative 203

Index 225

2008年10月13日 星期一

Writing Memoir, McCain Found a Narrative for Life

政治人物模仿自己的"自傳"


The Long Run

Writing Memoir, McCain Found a Narrative for Life

Stephan Savoia/Associated Press

COLLABORATIVE EFFORT John McCain with Mark Salter, his speechwriter and co-author.


Published: October 12, 2008

WASHINGTON — For 25 years after his release from a North Vietnamese prison, Senator John McCain tried to build a reputation as more than a famous former captive. “I never want to be a professional P.O.W.,” he often told friends. He refused to let his campaigns use pictures from his incarceration, and he never mentioned his torture.

Skip to next paragraph

The Long Run

Embracing a War Story

This is part of a series of articles about the lives and careers of the Republican and Democratic candidates for president in 2008.

Previous Articles in the Series »

Blog

The Caucus

The CaucusThe latest political news from around the nation. Join the discussion.

Associated Press, left

In his memoirs, John McCain drew parallels between himself as a young aviator, left, and characters that inspired him, like those played by Marlon Brando, right.

Dith Pran/The New York Times

NEW APPEAL Mr. McCain, signing his book in 1999, used his memoir’s story line to shape a campaign message.

“When somebody introduces me like, ‘Here is our great war hero,’ I don’t like it,” Mr. McCain complained in a 1998 interview with Esquire magazine. “Jesus,” he said, “it can make your skin crawl.”

Mr. McCain’s impatience with his war story soon changed, however, when he became not only its protagonist but also its author. His 1999 memoir, “Faith of My Fathers,” for the first time put his prison camp ordeal at the center of his public persona. In its pages, he recalled the experience as much more than a trial: a turning point from glory-seeking flyboy to responsible patriot, the final resolution of a rebellion against his father’s expectations, and the origin of a drive “to serve a cause” larger than himself.

A descendant of Navy admirals who wrote unpublished novels and quoted Victorian poetry, Mr. McCain, the Republican presidential nominee, often surprises aides and friends with his literary musings and bibliophilic appetite. He cites characters from fiction and film as role models.

As he recounted his history to his speechwriter and co-author, Mark Salter, Mr. McCain echoed their stories; his memoir incorporated some of the defiance of Marlon Brando’s outlaws, the self-discovery of W. Somerset Maugham’s “Of Human Bondage” and the stoicism of Ernest Hemingway’s dying hero in “For Whom the Bell Tolls.” (“You know he is a fictional character?” Mr. Salter said he once asked Mr. McCain, who replied, “I know, but he was influential!”)

Mr. Salter, taking a little literary license, assembled from Mr. McCain’s recollections a neat narrative that he had never before articulated. It became a best seller, a television movie and the first of five successful McCain-Salter volumes. And on the eve of Mr. McCain’s 2000 Republican primary run, its story line reshaped his political identity. In interviews and speeches, Mr. McCain has increasingly described his life in the book’s language and themes, and never more so than during his current campaign, which has turned back to the story of “Faith of My Fathers” for everything from its first television commercial to his speech at the Republican convention.

Politics was imitating art, said Stephen Wayne, a political scientist at Georgetown who has studied Mr. McCain’s career and memoir. “It is almost as if McCain had described himself as a literary character,” Professor Wayne said, “and then he tried to be that person in real life.”

Some friends say it is only natural that Mr. McCain would begin to sound like his autobiography. “If I have some thoughts in my mind and I take the time to write them down,” said Orson Swindle, a close friend from prison camp, “I find that I will be inclined to say them exactly that way over and over, too.”

Still, other friends say they marvel at how heavily the McCain campaign relies on the chastened-hero image created by “Faith of My Fathers,” for example, citing his prison experience to deflect questions on array of unwelcome questions about his campaign tactics, his personal wealth and his health insurance, among other matters.

Robert Timberg, a marine wounded in Vietnam who became Mr. McCain’s biographer and admired his memoir, said the John McCain he knew 15 years ago would never have suggested that he was more patriotic than a rival the way the senator has in attacking his Democratic opponent, Senator Barack Obama.

“Political campaigns have a way of distorting reality and turning political candidates into caricatures of themselves,” Mr. Timberg said, adding, “In some ways that has happened to him, and in some ways he may have contributed to that.”

Mr. Salter called that assertion “deeply offensive.”

“People who say that kind of thing — I know a lot of reporters who have said it — don’t have the faintest concept or grasp of what motivates John McCain and his personal conception of honor,” Mr. Salter said. “He earned the right to tell that story.”

Reluctant Memoirist

Mr. McCain’s career as an author began not long after the 1995 publication of Mr. Timberg’s book, “The Nightingale’s Song,” which explored the legacy of Vietnam through the lives of the senator and four other graduates of the Naval Academy. It drew critical praise but moderate sales. Mr. Timberg’s literary agent, Philippa Brophy, saw a whole book in Mr. McCain alone.

When she visited his office, however, Mr. McCain resisted. He had turned down plenty of other book offers, and he worried that the image of him as a prisoner could make him look weak, several advisers said. He preferred to rely on black humor in talking about the period — telling an anecdote about stealing a fellow prisoner’s wash rag, or falling out of a shower trying to catch a glimpse of a ponytailed Vietnamese laundress.

Until then, Mr. McCain had always campaigned as an uncomplicated go-getter, full of energy and ideas. A former Navy liaison to the Senate, he presented himself as a well-connected insider with “experience in Washington,” in the words of his first 1982 campaign commercial, who could get things done for Arizona, his newly adopted home. He brought up his five years in Hanoi mainly to rebut criticisms that he was a carpetbagger (prison had made him appreciate the Arizona sunset, he said in the advertisement, smiling behind the wheel of a sports car).

Mr. McCain told Ms. Brophy that the only book he wanted to write was a tribute to others, like John F. Kennedy’s “Profiles in Courage” — just what every senator says, she recalled thinking to herself.

Whom might he profile? she said she asked, playing along. Mr. McCain started by naming his grandfather and father, both four-star admirals with storied careers.

“And you!” she interrupted. “That’s your book. You’re done.”

Conceiving of the project as a tribute to his family, Mr. McCain signed on, tapping Mr. Salter to help write it. Mr. Salter, now 53, had been writing speeches for Mr. McCain, 72, for nearly a decade. “Mark literally loves John McCain like a father,” Mr. Swindle said. “Like brothers,” Mr. McCain has said.

An admirer of William Trevor, the often-bleak Irish author — a taste Mr. McCain has picked up — Mr. Salter is known among colleagues for his gloomy view of human nature and the world. Mr. McCain has a similar streak. “It’s always darkest before it’s totally black,” he often says, a motto borrowed from the “Peanuts” character Charlie Brown that he jokingly misattributes to Mao.

The McCain-Salter collaboration imbued the memoir with its confessional, often foreboding tone, friends say. The combination “was like taking darkness and fatalism, then pulling down the shades and contemplating our dark fate,” said John Weaver, a friend and former adviser to Mr. McCain.

Mr. McCain grew up in a family full of aspiring writers, where “people talked about characters in books as though they were real people,” said Elizabeth Spencer, a novelist and a second cousin of Mr. McCain’s who spent much of World War II with him as a child at the family’s Mississippi plantation.

A beloved uncle, Bert Andrews, won a Pulitzer Prize as a reporter for The New York Herald Tribune in 1948. The senator’s grandfather, the first Adm. John S. McCain, had left behind a drawer full of unpublished fiction, including adventure stories under the pseudonym Casper Clubfoot. And the senator’s father, Adm. John S. McCain Jr., loved to recite martial poems to his sons, especially “Ave Imperatrix,” Oscar Wilde’s eulogy for the waning British Empire.

As a student, Mr. McCain was always more enthusiastic about reading and writing than science or math. At the Naval Academy and then in flight school, he almost flunked out because of his indifference to technical subjects like fluid dynamics, Mr. Swindle said. “He would rather be reading ‘The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich.’ ”

Influential Heroes

Sitting down with Mr. Salter for more than 50 hours of recorded interviews that furnished the memoir’s raw material — many episodes were set in print almost as Mr. McCain described them, Mr. Salter said — the senator often brought up the stories and characters that influenced him and they in turn infused the book. “When he tells his story,” Mr. Salter said, “they come through.”

The John McCain of “Faith of My Fathers,” for example, bears more than a little resemblance to the fictional Robert Jordan of “For Whom the Bell Tolls,” the Hemingway hero Mr. McCain later celebrated in another book with Mr. Salter, “Worth the Fighting For,” which was named for a line of Jordan’s dying thoughts. He was “a man who would risk his life but never his honor,” Mr. McCain wrote with Mr. Salter, a model of “how a great man should style himself.”

Each book is heavy with premonitions of mortality. Robert Jordan and John McCain each confront great tests (the temptation to escape a doomed mission for one, the offer of early prison release for the other) in the service of a lost cause (the socialists in the Spanish Civil War, the Americans in Vietnam). And in accepting his fate, each makes peace with his father and grandfather.

Mr. McCain’s admirers, like Mr. Timberg, have often puzzled over what drew him to Maugham’s “Of Human Bondage.” It is a convoluted psychodrama about a young man with a club foot; he seethes with resentment over his disability and nearly ruins his life in the thrall of a waitress-turned-prostitute who rejects him. But the character’s final realization could fit almost as well near the conclusion of Mr. McCain’s memoir: “It might be that to surrender to happiness was to accept defeat, but it was a defeat better than many victories.”

“That explains it,” Mr. Salter said when he heard the line. “Perfect McCainism.”

The appeal of the young Marlon Brando, whose career was at its height during the senator’s adolescence in the 1950s, is easier to see. Both he and Mr. McCain were short (about 5-foot-9) tough guys with volatile tempers and surprisingly soft voices. (Friends say Mr. McCain likes to imitate Brando erupting in rage: “You scum-sucking pig!”)

Brando would have been well cast as the young John McCain of “Faith of My Fathers” — a thin-skinned troublemaker with an authority problem and a righteous streak.

Mr. McCain has often described the Brando film “Viva Zapata!” as the “greatest movie of all time.” It is the tale of a mercurial Mexican revolutionary who forms a new government, then fights against it. “I loved so much the idea of one man on a white horse, fighting for justice,” Mr. McCain wrote. “That was the essential truth of his life: he was a man who fought.”

Like “Faith of My Fathers,” Mr. McCain’s other Brando favorite, the Western “One-Eyed Jacks,” is a father-son story of sorts. Brando played an outlaw known as Kid who kills a former accomplice-turned-sheriff named Dad and runs off with his stepdaughter.

To Mr. Salter, Mr. McCain opened up about his feelings for his father — discomfort at his binge drinking, resentment of the presumption that the son would follow his father to the Naval Academy, and the unexpected emotions he experienced in midlife when his fame had at last exceeded his father’s.

“It is a wonderful narrative, spiced with psychological insights,” said Stanley Renshon, a psychoanalyst and political scientist at the City University of New York who has written about Mr. McCain and his book. “Almost like McCain’s version of psychoanalysis.”

Political Theme

But Mr. McCain was still reticent about his experience in Hanoi. “He kind of shorted me on the prison stuff,” Mr. Salter said.

To fill in the details, Mr. Salter consulted the McCain family, Navy archives and fellow former P.O.W.’s. “I would say 50 to 60 percent of it was from McCain,” Mr. Salter said.

Mr. Salter said he found a summary of what became the arc of the story in a quote tucked deep inside Mr. Timberg’s book, from a Senate aide and Korean War veteran who admired Mr. McCain. “I knew 200 John McCains,” said the aide, William Bader. “They’re vaguely paunchy, overgrown boys. If John McCain had not had this Vietnamese experience, of prison, of solitude, of brutality, he would have just been one more Navy jock.”

Retelling his captivity as a coming-of-age tale was partly a literary device, Mr. Salter acknowledged. By the time Mr. McCain, a Navy pilot, was shot down at age 31, he had already outgrown his extended adolescence, married and become a father, and gotten serious about his Navy career, he told Mr. Salter.

Still, Mr. McCain also said more vaguely that he had matured in prison, that he had learned to see that life was about more than his career and his reputation, Mr. Salter said. As Mr. McCain had put it in his first television commercial, “I have certainly become a better and enriched person for having had that experience, in a myriad of ways.”

In the memoir, Mr. Salter helped sharpen that point into what became the new refrain of his boss’s political ascent. Mr. McCain had thought “all glory was self-glory,” but prison taught him “there are greater pursuits than self-seeking,” Mr. Salter wrote for the senator. “Glory belongs to the act of being constant to something greater than yourself, to a cause, to your principles.”

In the Navy archives, Mr. Salter found an oral history in which the senator’s father recounted his last meeting with his own father, on an American ship in Tokyo Bay at the end of World War II.

“Son,” the first Admiral McCain had told the second, “there is no greater thing than to die for the principles — for the country and the principles that you believe in.”

Senator McCain might have heard the sentiment, but he had never seen the quotation. “He was pretty fascinated,” Mr. Salter said.

To tie together the three generations of Mr. McCain’s family memoir, Mr. Salter put the grandfather’s words into the mind of the young John McCain as he was returning home from Vietnam on the last page of “Faith of My Fathers”: “Down through the years, I had remembered a dying man’s legacy to his son,” Mr. Salter wrote in Mr. McCain’s voice, “and when I needed it most, I had found my freedom abiding in it.”

Critics praised the book as a much more gripping tale than the usual Washington fare. Some who knew the senator and Mr. Salter, though, rolled their eyes at the heavy emotion and tidy moral. “I thought, ‘Oh guys, come on!’ ” recalled Victoria Clarke, Mr. McCain’s friend and former press secretary. “In his early years,” Ms. Clarke said, “he tried so hard to make sure people didn’t see him as a P.O.W.”

But when 1,200 people crammed into a church near Kansas City for a book signing on a September night in 1999, Mr. McCain’s campaign managers realized they had found a potent new tool. They quickly expanded a two-week book tour into a major part of Mr. McCain’s 2000 Republican primary campaign. “Faith of My Fathers” sold more than 500,000 copies, easily exceeding the $500,000 advance. (Mr. McCain gave half the proceeds from his books to Mr. Salter, with the other half going to charity.)

When it came time to write Mr. McCain’s speech accepting the Republican presidential nomination this summer, Mr. Salter said, it was only natural to return to “Faith of My Fathers.” “To remind people who he is,” Mr. Salter said. “ ‘Here is who I am, here is why you can believe me.’ ”

Mr. McCain owes much to the book, said Mr. Weaver, who guided the senator’s 2000 campaign. “It made his persona much grander, much more cause-oriented,” Mr. Weaver recalled. “The book played a major role in creating the brand that has served McCain so well.”

2008年10月12日 星期日

J.B. Jeyaretnam, an opposition politician in Singapore

J.B. Jeyaretnam

Oct 9th 2008
From The Economist print edition

Joshua “Ben” Jeyaretnam, an opposition politician in Singapore, died on September 30th, aged 82

AFP

EVEN in appearance, he seemed rather out of place in Singapore’s gleaming, ultra-modern urban landscape. In the early 1980s bankers and stockbrokers on their lunch breaks would shuffle in embarrassment past a courteous, dignified figure, vaguely reminiscent, in his muttonchop whiskers, of a Victorian statesman—Gladstone, say. J.B. Jeyaretnam would be railing against the government of the People’s Action Party (PAP) led by Lee Kuan Yew and hawking the Hammer, the organ of his opposition Workers’ Party.

The government managed to ensure Mr Jeyaretnam was out of place in other ways, too. When, later that decade, The Economist’s correspondent in Singapore invited him to a party for a visiting editor, the gathering quickly polarised into two unequal camps. Few guests, even among the expatriate businessmen there, were willing to be seen mingling with him. It was hard to imagine him as a dangerous subversive. But that was how the government seemed to see him; and as it was leading Singapore to extraordinary prosperity and stability, it seemed wisest not to upset it.



Mr Lee regarded Mr Jeyaretnam with unabashed contempt, as an adhesive nuisance rather like chewing-gum (banned in Singapore). “All sound and fury”, he wrote in his memoirs, adding that Mr Jeyaretnam was “a poseur, always seeking publicity, good or bad”. Mr Lee decided, however, that he was useful as a “sparring partner” for young PAP politicians untempered in the struggle for independence. His son, Lee Hsien Loong, who is now prime minister, took an equally dim view. In a letter of condolence to Mr Jeyaretnam’s two sons, he accused their father of helping “neither to build up a constructive opposition, nor our parliamentary tradition.”

Yet, the younger Mr Lee added, one had to respect Mr Jeyaretnam’s “dogged tenacity”. It was indeed remarkable. Born to Christian parents during a family visit to Jaffna, the heartland of Ceylonese (now Sri Lankan) Tamils, he was brought up in Singapore and, after studying law in London, built a legal practice at home. But he dabbled in politics, not, as a sensible man would have done, as a PAP member, but in opposition, at a time when the ruling party had a monopoly of parliamentary seats. In 1971 he revived the moribund Worker’s Party and preached the socialist ideals he had picked up in post-war London.

He stood for parliament in three general elections and two by-elections, losing every time. He also began to lose money, in a series of libel suits. In 1976 he was found guilty of accusing Lee Kuan Yew of nepotism and corruption and of being unfit to be prime minister. Mr Lee was awarded damages and costs. Appeals—as far as the Privy Council in London—were all defeated. In all, Mr Jeyaretnam calculated that over the years he paid out more than S$1.6m (more than $900,000) in damages and costs, sometimes for remarks that in many democracies would not lead to libel actions but be regarded as part of the cut-and-thrust of parliamentary politics.

Bloodied but unbowed

The bills mounted after 1981 when, at the sixth attempt, he won a seat in parliament at a by-election in the Anson constituency. Mr Lee blamed the failings of the PAP candidate as a public speaker, and the relocation, to create a container-holding area, of some of Anson’s dockers, who were not given other homes. But in his memoirs he also admitted that, with the dissipation of the sense of crisis that had surrounded independence and the split from Malaysia in 1965, voters wanted an opposition voice in parliament. In the 1984 general election Mr Jeyaretnam held Anson with an increased margin.

He was soon back in court as well as in parliament, accused of misstating the Workers’ Party’s accounts. Found guilty of perjury in 1986, he was fined, served a month in jail, became ineligible to sit in parliament for five years and was disbarred from legal practice. Again, he took his appeal to the Privy Council, which in 1988 overturned his disbarment and ruled he was the victim of a “grievous injustice”. Singapore subsequently abolished the right of appeal to the Privy Council.

Mr Jeyaretnam returned to the political fray, winning a seat in parliament again in 1997. He left it in 2001 and quit the Workers’ Party in disgust at its refusal to help him fight bankruptcy. But, stubborn to the core, he refused to admit he was beaten. Earlier this year he had cleared the bankruptcy, launched a new Reform Party, and readied himself for yet another tilt at the Lees and the PAP. But he was finding it harder to walk. His heart was weak, but he was loth to go through the surgery he needed. He soldiered on. The day before his death he was on his feet in court, arguing a case.

Mr Jeyaretnam never made a dent in the PAP’s power. Singaporeans know their government is efficient and clean, and that those who malign its leaders are likely to end up in court. Lee Kuan Yew argues that PAP ministers command respect because they are ready to be scrutinised, and that his libel actions were designed to defend the government’s reputation, not to silence the opposition. Certainly Mr Jeyaretnam, most distinguished of that tiny band, was never silenced. Lee Kuan Yew may have been infinitely the greater statesman, but some would have judged Mr Jeyaretnam the bigger man.

2008年10月11日 星期六

Jacques Monod, Jean- Marie Le Clezio




On This Day
June 1, 1976
OBITUARY

Jacques Monod, Nobel Biologist, Dies; Thought Existence Is Based on Chance

By FRANK J. PRIAL
Jacques Monod, the Nobel Prize-winning French biologist and director of the Pasteur Institute in Paris, died yesterday at his home in Cannes, France. He was 66 years old.
Dr. Monod shared the 1965 Nobel award for medicine and physiology with two colleagues at the Pasteur Institute, Francois Jacob and Andre Lwoff, for research on the workings of the living cell.
He was probably best known for his book-length essay, "Chance and Necessity," published in 1970. In it he postulated his chilling conviction that all existence is because of chance and that mankind's inevitable recognition of this fact will necessitate a complete revolution in human thought.
"Chance alone is at the source of all novelty, all creation in the biosphere," he wrote. "Pure chance, only chance, absolute but blind liberty is at the root of the prodigious edifice that is evolution. . . ."
Although he flirted briefly with Communism during World War II, he was as harsh on Marxist dialecticians as on what he called the "disgusting farrago of Judeo-Christian religiosity."
'Postulate of Objectivity'
"What I have tried to show," Dr. Monod told an interviewer in 1971, "is that the scientific attitude implies what I call the postulate of objectivity--that is to say, the fundamental postulate that there is no plan, that there is no intention in the universe.
"Now this," he went on, "is basically incompatible with virtually all the religious or metaphysical systems whatever, all of which try to show that there is some sort of harmony between man and the universe and that man is a product--predictable if not indispensable--of the evolution of the universe.
"One of the great problems of philosophy," Dr. Monod said, "is the relationship between the realm of knowledge and the realm of values. Knowledge is what is; values are what ought to be.
"I would say that all traditional philosophies up to and including Marxism have tried to derive the 'ought' from the 'is.' My point of view is that this is impossible, this is a farce." Dr. Monod maintained that the impossibility of deriving a set of values--the "ought" from blind happenstance, or the "is"--imposes on mankind the obligation to choose a system of values by which to live.
But he thought mankind was failing to do so. "There is absolutely no doubt that the risk of the race committing suicide is very great," he said, adding, "In my opinion, the future of mankind is going to be decided within the next two generations."
Dr. Monod said his own values were based on the existentialist ethics of his friend the late Albert Camus--"an ethics based on free choice"--and he denied that his intention was to create a philosophy of pessimism or despair.
Hero of the Resistance
Indeed, his own life belied the somber reflections his book--a best-seller in France in 1970 and 1971--engendered. A dapper, urbane man who played the cello and loved to sail, Jacques Lucien Monod was also a hero of the French Resistance. He held both the Croix de Guerre and the American Bronze Star.
He was born in Paris in 1910, the son of Lucien Monod, a painter, and Charlotte Todd MacGregor Monod, a native of Milwaukee. He studied at the Cannes Lycee and the University of Paris and joined the Pasteur Institute as a zoology instructor in 1931. He was named head of the institute's laboratory in 1945, head of the department of cellular biochemistry in 1954 and director in 1971.
Dr. Monod was a professor on the faculty of sciences at the University of Paris from 1959 to 1967 and a professor of molecular biology at the College de France from 1967 to 1972. He was a Rockefeller Foundation fellow in 1936, and was named a nonresident fellow of the Salk Institute in 1968.
Americans Made Offers
He was a frequent and open critic of the French Government for what he saw as its parsimonious treatment of scientific research, particularly of research at the Pasteur Institute. Just after winning the Nobel Prize in 1965, Professor Monod disclosed that most of his and his colleagues' research had been done "in a small, stuffy, sordid attic room," and he said that all three of them had earlier turned down a chance to move to the United States to work.
"The Americans did not make this offer in order to deprive France of its researchers," he said at the time, "bout only through generosity to permit us to work in decent conditions with a maximum of efficiency."
Dr. Monod could have moved to the United States with relative ease. He spoke English with almost no trace of an accent and he was already a member of the Academy of Arts and Sciences.
Appealed for Support
In 1973, Dr. Monod visited this country, in an attempt to save the Pasteur Institute from bankruptcy. He noted he had trimmed the staff, patented a new influenza vaccine in the name of the institute, and had appealed for both governmental and private support.
The institute was founded by Louis Pasteur in 1888 with public donations including large grants from the Czar of Russia, the Sultan of Turkey and the Emperor of Brazil. Pasteur was buried there in 1895. Eight men who worked or studied there have won Nobel Prizes in medicine or physiology.
The institute is divided into a research section and a pharmaceutical-manufacturing section that grosses more than $20 million in sales a year. After taking over in 1971, Dr. Monod dismissed more than 130 scientists and technicians, or about 10 percent of the staff.
Dr. Monod, who acknowledged several years ago that running the Pasteur Institute gave him no time for his own research projects, was honored by the Nobel committee for showing how the living cell manufactures the substances of life.
Control of Protein Manufacture
With Professor Jacob, he demonstrated how the cell's production of proteins is controlled by a feedback process analogous to that by which a thermostat controls the temperature in a room.
They found that while one type of gene in a cell's nucleus holds the blueprints for the substances to the manufactured, another gene regulates the rate of production, based on whether a given protein is in long or short supply. This is the mechanism that permits the required coordination of all the molecular manufacturing activities that are the essence of the metabolism and thus of life itself.
Dr. Monod was a member of the Washington Academy of Science, the Royal Society of London and the Czechoslovak Academy of Science.
His wife, the former Odette Bruhl, whom he married in 1938, died in 1972. Two sons survive.
****

French Writer Wins Nobel Prize

Published: October 9, 2008

LONDON — The French writer Jean-Marie Gustave Le Clézio, whose work reflects a seemingly insatiable restlessness and sense of wonder about other places and other cultures, won the 2008 Nobel Prize in Literature on Thursday. In its citation, the Swedish Academy praised Mr. Le Clézio, 68, as the “author of new departures, poetic adventure and sensual ecstasy, explorer of a humanity beyond and below the reigning civilization.”
Skip to next paragraph

Michel Euler/Associated Press
The works of Jean-Marie Gustave Le Clézio reflect a sense of wonder about other cultures.

Related

Excerpts From Le Clézio’s Work (October 10, 2008)

From the Archives: Winners of the Nobel Prize in Literature (October 12, 2006)

Times Topics: Jean-Marie Gustave Le Clézio

Citation by The Swedish Academy (nobelprize.org)

Further Reading

Nobel Prizes
Nobel Prizes
Complete coverage, including a list of this year's winners.
Go to the Times Topics Page »

Mr. Le Clézio’s work defies easy characterization, but in more than 40 essays, novels and children’s books, he has written of exile and self-discovery, of cultural dislocation and globalization, of the clash between modern civilization and traditional cultures. Having lived and taught in many parts of the world, he writes as fluently about North African immigrants in France, native Indians in Mexico and islanders in the Indian Ocean as he does about his own past.
Mr. Le Clézio is not well known in the United States, where few of his books are available in translation, but he is considered a major figure in European literature and has long been mentioned as a possible laureate. The awards ceremony is planned for Dec. 10 in Stockholm, and, as the winner, Mr. Le Clézio will receive 10 million Swedish kronor, or about $1.4 million.
At an impromptu news conference in Paris at the headquarters of his publisher, Éditions Gallimard, Mr. Le Clézio seemed unperturbed by all the attention. He said he had received the telephone call telling him about the prize while he was reading “Dictatorship of Sorrow,” by the 1940s Swedish writer Stig Dagerman.
“I am very happy, and I am also very moved because I wasn’t expecting this at all,” he said. “Many other names were mentioned, names of people for whom I have a lot of esteem. I was in good company. Luck or destiny, or maybe other reasons, other motives, had it so that I got it. But it could have been someone else.”
In a news conference in Stockholm after the announcement, Horace Engdahl, the permanent secretary of the Swedish Academy, which awards the prize each year, described Mr. Le Clézio as a cosmopolitan author, “a traveler, a citizen of the world, a nomad.”
“He is not a particularly French writer if you look at him from a strictly cultural point of view,” Mr. Engdahl said. “He has gone through many different phases of his development as a writer and has come to include other civilizations, other modes of living than the Western, in his writing.”
Last month, Mr. Engdahl provoked a wave of indignation when he criticized American writers as “too isolated, too insular” and “too sensitive to trends in their own mass culture.” Europe, he declared, is “the center of the literary world.” No American has won the Nobel literature prize since Toni Morrison did in 1993.
Mr. Le Clézio was born in 1940 in Nice and raised in a nearby village, speaking English and French. His father, a British doctor with strong family connections on the island of Mauritius, lived in Africa for many years while Jean-Marie was growing up. When he was 7, Jean-Marie traveled to Nigeria with his family and spent a year out of school, an experience he recalled later in his semiautobiographical novel “Onitsha” (1991).
He studied English at the University of Bristol, graduated from the Institut d’Études Littéraires in Nice, received a master’s degree at the University of Aix-en-Provence and wrote his doctoral thesis for the University of Perpignan on the early history of Mexico. He has taught at colleges in Mexico City, Bangkok, Albuquerque and Boston; has lived among the Embera Indians in Panama; and has published translations of Mayan sacred texts.
His first marriage ended in divorce; he married again in 1975. He and his second wife, Jemia, who is from Morocco, divide their time among Nice, Mauritius and Albuquerque.
Mr. Le Clézio became a literary sensation with his first novel, “Le Procès-verbal” (1963),訴訟紀錄 published in English as “The Interrogation.” The novel follows the meanderings around town of a sensitive young man who winds up for a time in a mental hospital. It has been compared in mood to Camus’s “The Stranger.”
But his style evolved in later books, becoming more lyrical and accessible, and taking on bolder and more sweeping themes, often with an ecological underpinning.
“The latter part has a very contemporary feel,” said Antoine Compagnon, a professor of French and comparative literature at Columbia University. “It has an openness to others, to other cultures, to the South, to minorities. This is a very current sensibility.”
Bronwen Martin, a research fellow in the French department at Birkbeck College in London, said Mr. Le Clézio’s work had recently become more popular among academics. “I think it’s because of his more explicitly postcolonial work,” said Ms. Martin, who has written two books on Mr. Le Clézio’s writing.
In 1980, Mr. Le Clézio published “Désert,” the story of a young nomad woman from the Sahara and her clashes with modern European civilization. The book was considered his definitive breakthrough, and it became the first winner of the Grand Prix Paul Morand, awarded by the Académie Française.
In the United States, David R. Godine, one of a handful of publishers that have released Mr. Le Clézio’s works in English, plans to issue a paperback edition of “The Prospector” (translated from “Le Chercheur d’Or” in French) and plans to publish “Désert” in English.
In a reminder that politics and culture are closely intertwined in France, the prime minister, François Fillon, said in a statement that the award “consecrates French literature” and “refutes with éclat the theory of a so-called decline of French culture.”
Mr. Le Clézio is not one to seek the limelight. He once described himself in an interview as “a poor Rousseauist who hasn’t really figured it out.”
He said, “I have the feeling of being a very small item on this planet, and literature enables me to express that.”
Asked at the news conference if he had any message to convey, Mr. Le Clézio said: “My message will be very clear; it is that I think we have to continue to read novels. Because I think that the novel is a very good means to question the current world without having an answer that is too schematic, too automatic. The novelist, he’s not a philosopher, not a technician of spoken language. He’s someone who writes, above all, and through the novel asks questions.”

Reporting was contributed by Alan Cowell, Chine Labbé and Basil Katz from Paris, and Motoko Rich from New York.

Excerpts From Le Clézio’s Work


Published: October 9, 2008

French author Jean-Marie Gustave Le Clézio has written more than 40 books, 12 of which have been translated into English, an exotic canon of novels, essays and children’s books. Below are excerpts from a few of his works.

In the beginning of summer most of the children were like little savages — sunbrowned faces, arms and legs, bits of grass tangled in their hair, torn, dirt-smudged clothes. Esther loved going out with the children every morning, in that mixed group of boys and girls, Jewish children and children from the village, all rowdy, tousled — Mr. Seligman’s class. With them, she ran through the still-cool, narrow village streets, then across the large square making dogs bark and old people sitting in the sun grumble. They followed the street with the stream down toward the river, cut through the fields to reach the cemetery. When the sun burned down hot, they bathed in the icy waters of the torrent. The boys stayed down below and the girls climbed up the torrent to hide behind the huge boulders. But they knew the boys came into the bushes to spy on them, they could hear their muffled snickering and they splashed water around haphazardly and let out shrill shrieks.
Esther was the wildest of them all with her black curly hair cropped short, her brown face, and when her mother saw her come home for lunch she said, “Hélène, you look like a gypsy!” That pleased her father and so he said her name in Spanish, “Estrellita, little star.”
He was the one who’d first shown her the vast grassy fields high above the village, above the torrent. Still farther up began the road leading to the mountains, the dark forest of larches — but that was another world. Gasparini said that in winter there were wolves in the forest and if you listened at night, you could hear them howl far off in the distance. But as hard as she listened at night in her bed, Esther had never heard their howling, maybe because of the sound of the water that was constantly streaming down the middle of the street.
— from “Etoile Errante” (“Wandering Star”) (1992), translated from the French by C. Dickson.
John, from Nantucket:
It was in the beginning, at the very beginning, when there was nobody on the sea, nothing more than birds and sunlight. Since childhood I had dreamed of going there, to this place where all began and all ended. They spoke of it as though of a secret, like a treasure. In Nantucket they all spoke about it, talking as though drunk. They said that over there in California there existed a secret place in the ocean where the whales went to birth their young, and where the old females went to die. There was this reservoir, this immense shallow in the sea, where they gathered by the thousands, the youngest along with the oldest, and the males formed a protective circle around them to prevent orcas and sharks from entering, and the sea roiled under the crash of fins, the sky grew misty with the spray of blowholes, with the cries of the birds sounding like a forge.
This is what they said. They all told stories of this place as though they had seen it. And I, on the piers of Nantucket, I listened to them and also remembered as though I had been there.
And now it all has disappeared. I remember it, it is as though my life has been this dream alone, in which everything that was beautiful and new in the world was undone, destroyed. I never returned to Nantucket. Does the ripple of this dream still exist?
— from “Pawana” (1992), translated from the French by Christophe Brunski.

la Fiévre 發燒
前言
寫作就是用詞語探索
深入細緻地研究並描繪
毫不通融地刻畫現實



諾貝爾文學獎得主勒‧克萊喬,對台灣讀者來說是陌生的名字。皇冠曾在2000年與2006年,出版他的小說「金魚」與「偶遇」,並未引起注意。拜得獎之賜,皇冠將緊急換上新書腰,重新上市。
皇冠編輯沈書萱形容克萊喬是「寂寞的大師」。他在法國無人不知,在台灣卻連法文系學者也未必了解。她認為,克萊喬的寫作風格安靜而內斂,筆下故事情節簡單、人物不多。他擅以白描手法細細描述主角的內心變化,「需要安靜下來慢慢體會」,在眾聲喧嘩的台灣書市容易被忽略。
克萊喬在多元文化的環境中成長。祖先在18世紀自法國布列塔尼移居模里西斯島,成為英國公民。父親長年在英屬喀麥隆和奈及利亞行醫,母親則是法國人。克來喬生於法國尼斯,由祖母和母親撫養長大,她們培養了克萊喬對閱讀及寫作的喜好。
克萊喬擁有豐富的旅行經驗。他的第一次寫作經驗便發生在八歲時,從尼斯坐船到非洲和父親相聚。為了打發坐船的無聊時光,他寫了第一篇故事,異國風情和漂泊氣息因此成為他小說的主調。
克萊喬小說常以漂泊不定的邊緣人物為主角。「金魚」描述從小被人口販子抱走的北非少女,15年在世界各地四處流浪的故事。
「偶遇」則敘述12歲的小女孩娜希瑪喬裝成小男孩,偷偷登上停泊在自由港的豪華遊艇「秘密」,與過氣電影製片默格一起展開一段追尋自由與自我的航程。書中娜希瑪的醫生父親凱加斯,為個人自由拋家棄女,與克萊喬到非洲行醫的父親頗為類似。
「偶遇」的第二篇作品「安格利‧馬拉」,源於巴拿馬的印第安古老傳說。描述印第安青年巴維托從小在城市長大,18歲時決定重回出生地尋找生命源頭,最後因為愛人被殺,他殺光仇人後退化為野人。
為「偶遇」寫導讀的中原大學應用外語系講師張慧卿表示,克萊喬是說故事能手,讀者經常可以在他的小說中「嗅到孤獨、沉默、漂流的氣息,看到人類對探求生命 源頭和追求心靈自由的強烈慾望及堅毅力量」。他關心的主題還包括少數弱勢民族、人類與大自然的關係、過度膨脹的城市對自然文化的破壞等。


本屆諾貝爾文學獎公布之前幾天,瑞典學院常務秘書賀拉斯.恩格道爾在接受美聯社的訪談時說:世界文學的中心仍然是歐洲,而不是美國,這是一個無法否認的事實。這種歐洲中心主義在瑞典學院是根深柢固的。
其實在2005年,諾獎評委主席由看重第三世界文學的維斯特伯(Per Wastberg)院士接任,這在一定程度上,代表著瑞典學院內部一種轉移「歐洲中心」的傾向。也因此,今年頒獎給法國作家勒.克萊喬(Jean- Marie Le Clezio),我們可以看到評委的「歐洲中心」主義與諾貝爾遺囑要求的「世界文學」眼光之間一種微妙的平衡。
瑞典學院公布的得獎作家小傳一開始就提到:勒.克萊喬的父母和家族與前法國殖民地非洲島國模里西斯有密切聯繫,二戰後的1948年,他八歲即隨父母移居尼日。瑞典學院獎掖的,是這位「新啟程的、詩意的冒險和有感官狂喜的作者,在主流文明之外和之下的人性探索者」。
勒.克萊喬獲獎,並不出乎瑞典文學界的預測之外,因為他被譯為瑞典文的著作有十多本,頗受瑞典讀者歡迎。瑞典最大報《每日新聞》文化版10月8日預測可能 得獎人,刊出十位作家及照片,其中除了大眾熟知的美國作家菲利浦.羅斯、敘利亞詩人阿都尼斯、南韓詩人高銀等,這位法國小說家勒.克萊喬也在名單之列。
瑞典學院頒獎給勒.克萊喬後,贏得一片掌聲,沒有往常發生過的那種噓聲。瑞典筆會主席林奈(Bjorn Linnell)表示稱許。瑞典電視台報導中強調他作品中的歷史記憶,因「人們不能沒有記憶而活著」。女記者稱讚作品涉及到許多殖民和後殖民的議題。好幾 位評論家認為實至名歸。

網誌存檔