2018年7月28日 星期六

Steven Pinker:Enlightenment Now;Henry Kissinger: ‘We are in a very, very grave period’


Steven Pinker

https://stevenpinker.com/
Web site for Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology, Harvard University and author of books on language, mind, & human nature.



https://www.ted.com/talks/steven_pinker_is_the_world_getting_better_or_worse_a_look_at_the_numbers



*Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress*

"One aspect of the book unlike anything that came out of the Enlightenment is the use of data as a basic component of the argumentation. It’s not that I think Enlightenment figures would have found this mode of argument alien. On the contrary, the use of graphs to visualize data was itself an Enlightenment innovation."
BLOG.LAREVIEWOFBOOKS.ORG
Andy Fitch interviews Steven Pinker, Johnstone Professor of Psychology at Harvard and author of "Enlightenment Now."







https://www.ft.com/content/926a66b0-8b49-11e8-bf9e-8771d5404543

Henry Kissinger: ‘We are in a very, very grave period’ The grand consigliere of American diplomacy talks about Putin, the new world order — and the meaning of Trump Share on Twitter (opens new window) Share on Facebook (opens new window) Share on LinkedIn (opens new window) Save Save to myFT Edward Luce JULY 20, 2018 Print this page725 It was not hard to entice Henry Kissinger to meet for lunch. Though he is 95, and moves very slowly, the grand consigliere of American diplomacy is keen to talk. He hops on and off planes to see the likes of Russia’s Vladimir Putin and China’s Xi Jinping with as much zeal as when he played the global chess game as Richard Nixon’s diplomatic maestro. He loves to be in the thick of things. Persuading him to say what he actually thinks is another matter. Kissinger is to geopolitical clarity what Alan Greenspan was to monetary communication — an oracle whose insight is matched only by his indecipherability. It is my mission to push him out of his comfort zone. I want to know what he really thinks of Donald Trump. The timing is perfect. We are having lunch the day after Trump met Putin in Helsinki — a summit that America’s foreign-policy establishment believes will go down as a low point in US diplomacy. Trump had done the unthinkable by endorsing Putin’s protestations of innocence of electoral sabotage over the word of America’s intelligence agencies. Later today Trump will unconvincingly try to undo what he said in Helsinki by insisting he meant “wouldn’t” instead of “would”. But it is too late for that. The New York Daily News has the screaming headline: “Open Treason” next to a cartoon of Trump shooting Uncle Sam in the head while holding Putin’s hand. There could be no better moment to jolt Kissinger off his Delphic perch. I arrive with a minute or two to spare. Kissinger is already seated. He cuts a gnomish figure at a corner table in a half-empty dining room. A large walking cane is propped against the side wall. (He tore a ligament a few years ago.) “Forgive me if I don’t get up,” says Kissinger in his gravelly German accent. We are at the Jubilee, a cosy French restaurant just around the corner from Kissinger’s Midtown Manhattan apartment. It is only a few blocks from Kissinger Associates, the geopolitical consultancy that charges clients princely sums to hear what I assume are his unvarnished thoughts. My only inducement is a nice lunch. When we order, Kissinger checks whether he is my guest. “Ah yes,” he says, chortling after I insist he is. “Otherwise that would be corruption.” He eats here often. “I had dinner here just last night with my daughter,” he says. On two or three occasions, someone comes over to shake his hand. “I am the Ukrainian ambassador to the UN,” says one. “Who?” says Kissinger. “Ukraine,” the diplomat replies. “We think very highly of you.” Kissinger’s face lights up. “Ah Ukraine,” he says. “I am a strong supporter.” Geopolitics weighs heavily on Kissinger. As the co-architect of the cold war rapprochement with China and détente with the Soviet Union, Kissinger now surveys a world in which China and Russia are both challenging the US world order, often in concert with each other. But the doyen of cold war diplomacy is as interested in the future as he is in the past. This year Kissinger wrote a terrifying piece on artificial intelligence for The Atlantic Monthly, in which he compared humanity today to the Incas before the arrival of smallpox and the Spanish. He urged the creation of a presidential commission on AI. “If we do not start this effort soon, before long we shall discover that we started too late,” he concluded. This summer Kissinger is working from home on a book about great statesmen and women (there is a chapter on Margaret Thatcher). He has just finished a section on Nixon, the president whom he served — uniquely — both as secretary of state and national security adviser. It is 25,000 words long and Kissinger is toying whether to publish it separately as a short book. He worries it will backfire. “It might bring all the contestants out of their foxholes again,” he says. Do you mean that it could provoke comparisons between Watergate and Trump’s Russia investigation, I ask. “That is my fear,” he replies. Before I have a chance to follow up, Kissinger switches to Thatcher. “She was a magnificent partner,” he says. “I am a believer in the special relationship because I think America needs a psychological balance and this is a natural one based on history — not just on contributions.” Our starters arrive. Kissinger has a plate of chicken liver pâté, which he consumes with gusto. He has tucked his napkin bib-style into his upper shirt. I want to talk about Trump. Kissinger is keen to stay on Britain. I ask him about Lord Carrington, the former British foreign secretary, who resigned in 1982 to carry responsibility for failing to stop Argentina’s invasion of the Falkland Islands, and who died, aged 99, this month. On the day of Carrington’s death, Boris Johnson, the most recent British foreign secretary, quit with very different motives. You could say the first resigned with honour and the second with dishonour. “I loved Lord Carrington,” says Kissinger with feeling. “I never went to England without seeing him.” In all their years of friendship, Carrington did not once complain about having to resign, says Kissinger. “He said to me: ‘What is the point of assuming responsibility if you then whisper to your friends that you are not really responsible?’ I don’t think we have that quality any more because for that you need a tradition that you take for granted and we no longer can.” Johnson certainly doesn’t embody it, I suggest. “I don’t think Carrington thought much of Johnson,” Kissinger replies. What did Kissinger make of the Helsinki summit? His answer is halting. I think Trump may be one of those figures in history who appears from time to time to mark the end of an era and to force it to give up its old pretences “It was a meeting that had to take place. I have advocated it for several years. It has been submerged by American domestic issues. It is certainly a missed opportunity. But I think one has to come back to something. Look at Syria and Ukraine. It’s a unique characteristic of Russia that upheaval in almost any part of the world affects it, gives it an opportunity and is also perceived by it as a threat. Those upheavals will continue. I fear they will accelerate.” Kissinger embarks on a disquisition about Russia’s “almost mystical” tolerance for suffering. His key point is that the west wrongly assumed in the years before Putin annexed Crimea that Russia would adopt the west’s rules-based order. Nato misread Russia’s deep-seated craving for respect. “The mistake Nato has made is to think that there is a sort of historic evolution that will march across Eurasia and not to understand that somewhere on that march it will encounter something very different to a Westphalian [western idea of a state] entity. And for Russia this is a challenge to its identity.” Do you mean that we provoked Putin, I ask. “I do not think Putin is a character like Hitler,” Kissinger replies. “He comes out of Dostoyevsky.” Our main courses arrive. Kissinger has ordered branzino on a bed of green vegetables. He barely touches the dish. “No, but it was very good,” he says later when the waitress offers to pack it into a box. By contrast, I eat most of my Dover sole and Brussels sprouts. We are both drinking Badoit sparkling water, which Kissinger has specifically requested. I sense I am losing my battle to get him on to Trump — or failing to detect his hidden message. Is he saying we are underestimating Trump — that, in fact, Trump may be doing us the unacknowledged service of calming the Russian bear? Again, there is a pause before Kissinger answers. “I don’t want to talk too much about Trump because at some point I should do it in a more coherent way than this,” Kissinger replies. But you are being coherent, I protest. Please don’t stop. There is another pregnant silence. “I think Trump may be one of those figures in history who appears from time to time to mark the end of an era and to force it to give up its old pretences. It doesn’t necessarily mean that he knows this, or that he is considering any great alternative. It could just be an accident.” By now Kissinger has abandoned his halfhearted stabs at the fish. I know he has briefed Trump. He has also met Putin on 17 occasions. He reports the contents of those meetings to Washington, he tells me. I try a different tack. To whom does Trump compare in history, I ask. This also fails to do the trick. Kissinger goes off on a tour d’horizon of the health of European diplomacy. He can find no leader who excites him, with the possible exception of France’s Emmanuel Macron. “I can’t yet say he’s effective because he’s just started but I like his style,” says Kissinger. “Among other European statesmen, Angela Merkel is very local. I like her personally and I respect her but she’s not a transcendent figure.” Which diplomatic brain would he compare in today’s US establishment to himself, say, or the late Zbigniew Brzezinski — his former sparring partner, who also served as national security adviser? The mention of Brzezinski triggers something. “When Zbig died, which was a great surprise, I wrote to his wife that no death has moved me quite as much as his,” Kissinger says, again with evident feeling. “Zbig was almost unique in my generation. We both considered ideas about the world order to be the key problem of our time. How could we create it? We had somewhat different ideas. But for both of us, we were above all concerned to raise diplomacy to that level of influence.” Who is asking those questions today, I ask. “There is no debate today,” Kissinger replies. “It is something we need to have.” I cannot shake the feeling that Kissinger is trying to tell me something but that I am too literal to interpret it. Like a blindfolded darts player, I try a number of different throws. What would Germany become if Trump pulled America out of Nato? Kissinger likes that question but declines to give odds as to its likelihood. “In the 1940s, the European leaders had a clear sense of direction,” he says. “Right now they mostly just want to avoid trouble.” They are not doing a very good job of it, I interrupt. “That’s true,” says Kissinger with a cryptic smile. “One eminent German recently told me that he always used to translate tension with America as a way to move away from America but now he finds himself more afraid of a world without America.” So could Trump be shocking the rest of the west to stand on its own feet, I ask. “It would be ironic if that emerged out of the Trump era,” Kissinger replies. “But it is not impossible.” The alternative, Kissinger adds, is not appealing. A divided Atlantic would turn Europe into “an appendage of Eurasia”, which would be at the mercy of a China that wants to restore its historic role as the Middle Kingdom and be “the principal adviser to all humanity”. It sounds as though Kissinger believes China is on track to achieve its goal. America, meanwhile, would become a geopolitical island, flanked by two giant oceans and without a rules-based order to uphold. Such an America would have to imitate Victorian Britain but without the habit of mind to keep the rest of the world divided — as Britain did with the European continent. Kissinger is more circumspect on AI — a subject, he concedes, with which he is still grappling. But he is troubled by the unknown consequences of autonomous warfare — a world in which machines are required to take ethical decisions. “All I can do in the few years left of me is to raise these issues,” he says. “I don’t pretend to have the answers.” JUBILEE 948 1st Avenue, New York Pâté $13.50 Pea soup $11.00 Branzini $31.50 Dover sole $57.00 Bottle of sparkling water $8.50 Tea $4.50 Double espresso $9.00 Total (inc tax & tip) $176.00 I have little idea how Kissinger will take my next question. Is power an aphrodisiac? “What was the word?” Kissinger asks. “Aphrodisiac,” I repeat. I am quoting the famous Kissinger line that he made in the heyday of his career when he was still a single man. In the late 1960s and early 1970s he was as much known for his racy dating calendar as for affairs of state. “I would certainly say that being able to make decisions has a dimension that you don’t have in ordinary life,” Kissinger replies with the hint of a smile. That was a subtle answer, I tell him. “I did say that,” he replies. “But when I say these things they’re more intended to establish your cleverness than your life’s purpose. And it’s true to some extent. It is based on observation.” By now we are on to the coffee. Mine is a double espresso. Kissinger has mint tea. I decide to take a final stab at the bullseye. We have been talking for almost two hours. If there is one recurring criticism of Kissinger, I tell him, it is that he goes to great lengths to preserve access to people in power at the expense of not speaking plainly in public. Isn’t now — of all moments — the right one to burn a bridge or two? Kissinger looks crestfallen. “I take that seriously and a lot of people, good friends of mine, have been urging this on me,” he says eventually. “It could happen at some point in time.” There is no time like the present, I say with a nervous laugh. “It is clear the direction I am going in,” he replies. “Is it clear to you?” Sort of, I reply. You are worried about the future. However, you believe there is a non-trivial chance that Trump could accidentally scare us into reinventing the rules-based order that we used to take for granted. Is that a fair summary? “I think we are in a very, very grave period for the world,” Kissinger replies. “I have conducted innumerable summit meetings, so they didn’t learn this one [Helsinki] from me.” It is clear he will not elaborate further. I ask him which period he would liken to today. Kissinger talks about his experience as a freshly minted citizen in US uniform serving in the second world war. He also reminisces about what brought the young German refugee to these shores in the first place. After Germany marched into Austria in 1938, Jews in Kissinger’s home town were told to stay indoors. His parents left for America when they could. “There was a curfew and German soldiers everywhere,” he says. “It was a traumatic experience that has never left me.” His reminiscence is carefully chosen. Something like a biblical storm has descended since we sat down. One umbrella literally flew past the window. I help Kissinger through the soaking whiplash to his car. The driver takes his other arm. He is unsteady. I realise that I have been ungraciously interrogating a man almost twice my age. “Dr Kissinger has been looking forward to this lunch for days,” says the server after I return to borrow an umbrella. That is nice, I think — though I fear my Trump questions may have depressed his appetite. Edward Luce is the FT’s US national editor and author of ‘The Retreat of Western Liberalism’

從陳耀昌醫師(3)的故事,接著談些中研院院士:2,3,4,5位


杏林怪傑 陳耀昌



*****

我原本也要談些我所知道的今年台大的院士 (5位),看來讓給更適當的人。

2,3,4,5位指的是,某學長通知我東海畢業的院士;查教授 (詳下)至少3位。東海"園丁"通知我們,有4位........


陳耀昌今晨(2018.7.6)起來,看到新榜中硏院院士名單,心中浮起一件陳年往事。我還是醫學生的時候,初到精神科實習。某日門診,來一初診,是名校女生,雖發病中猶高雅秀麗絕倫,心中一震。那是我見到的第一位catatonic schizophrenia, 其病因自是少女情懷,不幸遇挫。她幽幽訴其情史,而該情人姓名,我竟然數十年不忘。孰料多年之後,再度見遇其名。嘆女大生真的慧眼識英雄,惜天不假緣。不知女大生後來無恙否?為之三嘆。
人生,是命。生死有命,富貴在天。這是我最常向病人說的話。
而姻緣情緣,也是天定。


查時傑 這屆新科院士,起碼有三位畢業於東海大學,杜维明、于君芳、錢嘉陵。錢兄與我建中1960級同屆同學,杜維明兄也是建中校友,他屆次更高。他受聘為台大歴史系客座教授時,有幸與他同研究室,可惜見面討教機會不多。



近2周前,鄧、袁學長及理學院院長、2位物理系老師等一行訪問歸國的錢學長,相談甚歡。我不忘提醒鄧學長兩件事:9月2日要來寒舍領服務獎,更重要的,你的校友影音紀錄要記得多錄女性校友---原先建議至少男女比率7比3......不見得要找"傑出校友"啦,你剛認識的1975級不是有很多"天之驕女"嗎.....





hc:
還有一位是東海的:工程科學組:何德仲 1971畢業-13屆化工系。錢嘉陵院士多年是物理的評議委員?,所以.....他2015年受我們"訪談",才知道他也是彈琴高手,總之,不愧是建中人。于君芳院士的中文講學,YouTube上可找到。杜維明院士今年才上的故事,很多人都曉得;有點擔心他的學生先選上;他的交際廣闊,可能少見:在前資生堂老董的回憶錄上,記載在瑞士相遇,後來請他到日本演講、當顧問。好日子,說些故事賀學長......





🎉第32屆中研院院士選舉結果揭曉🎉
歷時四天院士會議的審慎評選,本院於7月5日選出21位第32屆新科院士,包括數理科學組5名、工程科學組5名、生命科學組6名、人文及社會科學組5名。
廖俊智院長表示,中研院士為榮譽職,選舉過程審慎嚴謹 ,歷經多次審查及討論後,才能獲此殊榮。
中研院院士職權包括選舉院士及名譽院士、籌議國家學術研究方針、受政府及有關單位之委託,辦理學術設計、調查、審查及研究事項。
 新科院士底加 https://www.sinica.edu.tw/ch/news/5897
--
2018 Academicians Announced🎉
Academia Sinica held its biennial Convocation of Academicians from July 2 to July 5 culminating in the announcement of the 2018 list of Academicians on July 5, 2018. This year, total of 21 new Academicians were elected.



****

會談參考筆記 約2015.7.17
諸位同學:

我受的企業訓練,要求我寫些會談的紀錄。今晚非常感謝大家,尤其是錢學長夫婦的寶貴時間。如有許多疏失,就請大家原諒。所幸這是鄧學長錄影的補充資料。





會議( 5點~6點半):錢嘉陵教授 (參加完中研院物理所評議委員會會議)、袁祝平、鄧益裕;楊定亞(理)院長、張晃暐副教授(與錢嘉陵教授在美國一起參加會議)、某教授 (名字待鄧學長補)、鍾漢清晚餐( 7點~8點半,袁學長請客:福華會館B1的風尚咖啡):以上人員加上錢夫人



人事:袁祝平、鄧益裕同屆錢嘉圓 (錢嘉陵妹妹)現在長駐昆明。錢嘉陵母親燕京大學肄業,美國某大學畢業,其燕京大學英文教授後來任教東海大學。錢母從小就教錢嘉陵鋼琴,所以錢嘉陵在大學時可為陳同學伴奏。錢嘉陵謙稱自己音樂才華有限,所以轉行物理。

教學哲學:錢學長取得CMU博士之後,就到美國約翰霍甫金斯大學 (The Johns Hopkins University (commonly referred to as Johns Hopkins, JHU, or simply Hopkins... As of 2011, there have been 37 Nobel Laureates who either attended the university as undergraduate or graduate students, or were faculty members.[164] / https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johns_Hopkins_University)任教至今。他說美國大學無退休年齡規定,不過有授課要求,譬如說開一門課。錢學長的教學基本思想研究以興趣為主,要熱愛工作;質重於量。所以,他跟精選出的數位研究生可每日切磋;也不必多為研究生的grants 申請太花行政方面的心思。他強調美國專業同儕( Peer)之間的認可和制衡力量的重要。



美國私立大學的vision和研究、行政業務,以校長團隊的作為為主。董事會的主要任務是找好校長,委以治校全責;籌組募款 (約每十年會有一次大募款,目標約數十億美元。校友 Bloomberg約捐20億,校友IBM公司前董事長也捐錢,各位看一下他退休之後:In May 2013 Bloomberg LP appointed Palmisano as an independent advisor for the company's privacy and data standards.[17] )


錢學長跟某校學生演講過類似"成功的因素分析:以科學家的見解,現在可以知道許多成功的必備因素,可惜它們多半是個人無法改變的。個人能"貢獻"的,可能只是努力。 (以上是我猜測的)。同樣的,大學要成功,非有財力;好老師;好學生等不可。譬如說,沙烏地阿拉伯的某大學重金設立,不過其環境缺研究共同體和基本建設 (這些正是加州Silicon Valley),所以有缺點;類似的情形是中國的某些有錢的大學。錢學長談到該校主管要求負責招聘的人解釋為何新晉人員會比招聘者更優秀......(袁學長附和齊錫生學長寫香港科技大學的崛起

之經驗談,引用的書待補。)
"My experience at Tunghai, during its golden era,  was precious, unique, and memorable.  That Tunghai will stay with me forever.  But that Tunghai was long gone and will never return." 







Yu, Chun-fang (著)=于君方

于君方,美國哥倫比亞大學宗教學博士,專攻漢傳佛教研究。1972-2004年問任教于羅格斯大學宗教學系,現任哥倫比亞大學宗教學系、東亞語言文化學系,以及“聖嚴漢傳佛學講座”教授,致力于指導漢傳佛教的博士研究生。

她的第一本著作《中國的佛教復興︰株宏與晚期的宗教融合》,是研究唐代以後佛教最早的英文著作之一,另合編有《中國的香客和聖地》。《觀音》一書的英文版于2001年由哥倫比亞大學出版社出版。




觀音:菩薩中國化的演變中文書 , 于君方 陳懷宇、姚崇新、林佩瑩 , 法鼓 , 出版日期: 2009-07-01
優惠價: 9 折, 792 元

觀音菩薩是佛教中慈悲的化身,在印度、東南亞與西藏,亦是象徵神聖王權的男性神祇,然而在中國,「他」卻變成了「她」,成為循聲救苦的「慈悲女神」,並擁有截然不同的歷史與身世,深刻地影響了國人的生活與信仰。 于君方教授投注十多年的心血,以結合...... more

求法與弘法:漢傳佛教的跨文化交流國際研討會論文集中文書 , 于君方 , 法鼓 , 出版日期: 2015-10-01
優惠價: 9 折, 585 元

文化交流過程中,宗教是最重要的載體之一。漢傳佛教以漢譯佛典為根本,其影響之深遠,至今不減;教理教義固不在話下,種種儀軌、文藝,乃至日常生活以及節慶文化,莫不如是。 本論文集收錄了專題演講兩篇、研究... more

觀音︰菩薩中國畫的演變簡體書 , 于君方 , 商務印書館 , 出版日期: 2012-08-01
優惠價: 372 元

于君方,美國哥倫比亞大學宗教學博士,專攻漢傳佛教研究。1972-2004年問任教于羅格斯大學宗教學系,現任哥倫比亞大學宗教學系、東亞語言文化學系,以及“聖嚴漢傳佛學講座”教授,致力于指導漢傳佛教的博士研究生。 她的第一本著作《中國的佛教...... more



于君方簡介




1 民國二十七年生,河北人。 美國哥倫比亞大學哲學博士, 現任教於新澤西( New Jersey )州立羅格斯( Rutgers )大學宗教系,教授佛教與亞洲宗教等課程。一九九九年被選為美國中國宗教學會副會長。
2 早期興趣偏重宋、明佛教史,寫過蓮池大師的生平及著作,另有多篇有關禪宗清規與公案方面的論文。近十年作有關觀音信仰的研究,所著《中國的觀音信仰》( Kuan-Yin: The Chinese Transformation of Avalokiteshvara ), 即將由美國哥倫比亞大學出版社出版。


****
好消息!!!
東海大學新增4位中研院院士

新科東海院士
數理科學組:
錢嘉陵 1965畢業-7屆物理系

工程科學組:
何德仲 1971畢業-13屆化工系

人文及社會科學組:
于君方 1959畢業-1屆外文系
杜維明1961畢業-3屆中文系
-----------
《自由時報》2018-07-05 18:08
中研院從本週一開始舉行連續4天的院士會議,今天來到最後一天,也是最受矚
目的新科院士票選日。21位新科院士平均年齡65.57歲,其中工程科學組55
的張世富最年輕,最年長則是人文及社會科學組80歲的于君方。
新科院士包括數理科學組:錢嘉陵、王寶貫、鄭建鴻、李定國、蔡安邦。
工程科學組:梁錦榮、何德仲、張世富、盧志遠和王中林。
生命科學組:郭沛恩、汪育理、傅嫈惠、葉錫東、陳列平和鍾邦柱。
人文及社會科學組:鄭毓瑜、于君方、孫天心、高彥頤和杜維明。




🎉恭賀本校中文系鄭毓瑜教授獲選中研院第32屆新科院士🎉
新任院士名單:
數理科學組的錢嘉陵、王寶貫(地理學系、1971)、鄭建鴻、李定國、蔡安邦;
工程科學組的梁錦榮、何德仲、張世富(電機系、1985)、盧志遠(物理系、1972)、王中林;
生命科學組的郭沛恩、汪育理(物理系、1973)、傅嫈惠、葉錫東、陳列平、鍾邦柱(化學系、1974);
人文及社會科學組的杜維明、高彥頤、孫天心、于君方、鄭毓瑜(中文系1981、碩士1984、博士1990)

2018年7月25日 星期三

《秦永敏論和平轉型》。鞏俐。李小龍逝世45周年






秦永敏在香港出書成為“顛覆國家政權罪”證據


media2018年7月11日,中國人權觀察理事長秦永敏被判入獄13年,罪名是“接受外媒採訪及寫文章過多”觸犯顛覆國家政權罪。數字中國網站
早前被被武漢市中級法院以顛覆罪判囚13年的大陸著名異見人士秦永敏,根據法院近日公布對其的判決書,現年64歲的秦永敏的罪證之一,原來是將自己所寫的文章彙編成書在香港出版,並指秦在書中提出“顛覆國家政權的目標、策略、方法,鼓吹組建強大的反對派和反對黨”。香港出版人斥當局判決是莫須有。

秦永敏是中國民主黨主要創黨成員之一,自1970年至2012年間先後被拘禁39次,累計系獄23年。他在2010年11月因顛覆罪服刑12年出獄後,又因為相同罪名於2015年3月被刑事拘留。由於案件涉及國家秘密,案件延至今年5月11日至12日進行不公開審訊。
判決書指,秦永敏在2010年出獄後對中國社會制度和中共執政地位不滿,“為實現多元化民主政治,通過敵對組織中國民主黨成員將自己所寫的《論中國向憲政民主制的和平轉型》、《和平憲章(草案)》等文章彙編成《秦永敏論和平轉型》一書在香港出版,並撰寫大量具煽動性文章,提出‘全民和解,人權至上,良性互動,和平轉型’的目標,確定顛覆國家政權的方針和目標、策略和方法。”
判決書指,《秦永敏論和平轉型》一書是證據之一,該書由香港五七學社出版公司出版並發行,秦則在庭上供述:他在2012年3月委託香港的楊小炎出版了該書,目的是宣傳和平轉型和憲政民主理念。
香港五七學社由筆名“武宜三”的自由撰稿人凌文秀成立;蘋果日報引述凌文秀說,他是《秦永敏論和平轉型》一書出版人。“這本書大概印刷了一千本,由田園書屋發行,但只賣了數十本,大部份我都是拿來送人。香港人對這類書興趣不大,而近年內地海關查得很緊,導致禁書巿場萎縮。”他又指中國憲法保障人民有出版和言論自由,秦永敏在書中沒有鼓吹暴力革命,不明白為何出書會成為“顛覆國家政權”的罪證。






7月20日是一代武打巨星李小龍逝世45周年,李小龍會一連10日舉辦《李小龍-動.漫.游》展覽,展出逾100件世界各地以李小龍為主題的動漫及遊戲作品。與李結緣一生的影星丁珮更首次借出李小龍的名片展出,名片上只簡單印有“Bruce Lee”,是李小龍1972年名作《猛龍過江》拍攝時期贈予丁珮。













TRAD.CN.RFI.FR




逝世45周年香港舉辦《李小龍-動.漫.游》展覽

7月20日是一代武打巨星李小龍逝世45周年,李小龍會一連10日舉辦《李小龍-動.漫.游》展覽,展出逾100件世界各地以李小龍為主題的動漫及遊戲作品。與李結緣一生的影星丁珮更首次借出李小龍的名片展出,名片上只簡單印.....







【李安力邀 鞏俐出任金馬55評審團主席】
在新任金馬執委會主席李安的力邀之下,國際巨星鞏俐將出任本屆金馬獎評審團主席。自己也擔任過第50屆金馬獎評審團主席的李安,深深了解這既是榮譽,更是件苦差事。他認為鞏俐不僅在華語影壇舉足輕重,亦有豐富的國際經驗,是相當合適的人選。”
金馬影展 TGHFF
【李安力邀 鞏俐出任金馬55評審團主席】
在新任金馬執委會主席李安的力邀之下,國際巨星鞏俐將出任本屆金馬獎評審團主席。自己也擔任過第50屆金馬獎評審團主席的李安,深深了解這既是榮譽,更是件苦差事。他認為鞏俐不僅在華語影壇舉足輕重,亦有豐富的國際經驗,是相當合適的人選。
接下重任的鞏俐則表示:「電影是反映我們生活及夢想的一面鏡子。把一生奉獻給電影,為電影服務是我一生的責任與追求!感謝李安導演的邀請和信任。願為華人電影盡自己所能。」
第55屆金馬獎頒獎典禮將於11月17日於台北國父紀念館舉行,10月1日揭曉入圍名單的同時,也會公布所有評審團成員。本年度金馬獎劇情長片、紀錄片和動畫長片以及金馬國際影展、金馬創投會議、金馬電影學院的報名都將於7月31日截止。更多詳情可上金馬官方網站查詢(http://www.goldenhorse.org.tw/)。
■ 新聞全文請見:https://goo.gl/kJY42u

鞏俐(1965年12月31日),新加坡華人,生於中國遼寧省瀋陽市,於2008年入籍新加坡,著名電影演員。曾獲第49屆威尼斯國際電影節最佳女演員、兩屆中國電影金雞獎最佳女主角、第26屆香港電影金像獎最佳女主角等多個海內外演技大獎。

網誌存檔