2014年8月30日 星期六

Richard Attenborough, Actor, Director and Giant of British Film


Photo
Richard Attenborough, left, preparing to shoot Ben Kingsley, right, on the “Gandhi” set in the early ’80s. Mr. Attenborough won an Academy Award for best director.CreditColumbia Tristar

Richard Attenborough, a distinguished stage and film actor in Britain who reinvented himself to become the internationally admired director of the epic “Gandhi” and other films, died on Sunday. He was 90.
His death was confirmed by his son, Michael, according to the BBC.
Until the early 1960s, Mr. Attenborough was a familiar actor in Britain but little known in the United States. In London he was the original detective in Agatha Christie’s play “The Mousetrap.” On the British screen, he made an early mark as the sociopath Pinkie Brown in an adaptation of Graham Greene’s“Brighton Rock” (1947).
But it was not until he appeared with his friend Steve McQueen and a sterling ensemble cast in the 1963 war film “The Great Escape,” his first Hollywood feature, that he found a trans-Atlantic audience. His role, as a British officer masterminding an escape plan from a German prisoner-of-war camp, was integral to one of the most revered and enjoyable of allWorld War II films.
That performance established him in Hollywood and paved the way for a series of highly visible roles. He was the alcoholic navigator alongside James Stewart’s pilot in “The Flight of the Phoenix” (1965), a survival story about a plane crash in the desert. He won back-to-back Golden Globe Awards for best supporting actor: first in “The Sand Pebbles”(1966), also starring McQueen, set during China’s civil war in the 1920s, and then in the whimsical “Doctor Dolittle” (1967), playing Albert Blossom, a circus owner, alongside Rex Harrison as the veterinarian who talks to animals. In “The Chess Players” (1977), by the renowned Indian director Satyajit Ray, he was a British general in 19th-century India.
Photo
Mr. Attenborough as a sociopath in John Boulting’s drama “Brighton Rock” (1947).CreditAssociated British Picture Corporation
Years later Mr. Attenborough became known to a new generation of filmgoers as the wealthy head of a genetic engineering company whose cloned dinosaurs run amok in Steven Spielberg’s box office hit “Jurassic Park.”
But for most of Mr. Attenborough’s later career, his acting was sporadic while he devoted much of his time to directing.
Directing a Classic
“Gandhi” (1982), an epic but intimate biographical film, was his greatest triumph.
With the little-known Ben Kingsley in the title role, the film traces Mohandas K. Gandhi’s life as an Indian lawyer who forsakes his job and possessions and takes up a walking staff to lead his oppressed country’s fight for independence from Britain through a campaign of passive resistance, ending in his assassination.
Among the film’s critics were historians, who said it contributed to mythmaking, portraying Gandhi as a humble man who brought down an empire without acknowledging that the British, exhausted by World War II, were eager to unload their Indian possessions. Nevertheless, “Gandhi” was nominated for 11 Academy Awards and won eight, including best picture, best director, best cinematography, best original screenplay and best actor (Mr. Kingsley).
Mr. Attenborough brought the film to fruition after a 20-year battle to raise money and interest often reluctant Hollywood producers, one of whom famously predicted that there would be no audience for “a little brown man in a sheet carrying a beanstalk.” (Mr. Attenborough ended up producing it himself.)
Mr. Attenborough mortgaged his house in a London suburb, sold works of art and, as he put it, spent “so much money I couldn’t pay the gas bill.”
The film had 430 speaking parts and used over 300,000 extras for Gandhi’s funeral. No one expected it to recoup its $22 million cost, but it wound up earning 20 times that amount.
By then Mr. Attenborough had embraced the role of director, or “actor-manager,” as he called himself. (He said he understood actors and could help them give confident, truthful performances.) His first foray into directing was “Oh! What a Lovely War” (1969), an offbeat satirical musical about World War I with an all-star cast including Laurence Olivier, Maggie Smith, John Gielgud and Vanessa Redgrave.
In 1972 there was “Young Winston,” starring Simon Ward, about Churchill’s early years. In 1977 there was “A Bridge Too Far,” a cautionary World War II epic about a disastrous Allied defeat, which also fielded a starry cast: Olivier, Robert Redford, Sean Connery, Gene Hackman, Michael Caine and others.
Photo
Mr. Attenborough, left, with Laura Dern and Sam Neill in Steven Spielberg’s “Jurassic Park” (1993). CreditUniversal Pictures
After “Gandhi” came a 1985 adaptation of “A Chorus Line,” Michael Bennett’s musical about Broadway hoofers. It was a misfire — a faithful but uneasy translation to film. Mr. Attenborough had more success with “Cry Freedom!” (1987), a stirring look at the friendship between the antiapartheid fighter Steve Biko (Denzel Washington) and a journalist (Kevin Kline) in South Africa in the 1970s.
Five years later, after a hiatus from directing, Mr. Attenborough returned with what was largely considered to be his biggest flop:“Chaplin,” a long, sprawling biography of the silent film star Charlie Chaplin. Despite an admired and Oscar-nominated performance by Robert Downey Jr. in the title role and a potent mix of drama and slapstick humor, “Chaplin” did poorly at the box office. Like many of Mr. Attenborough’s movies, the story of Chaplin, the lowly born clown who defied the odds by achieving world renown, celebrated courage and endeavor. It was also an article of faith for him that his films told clear stories and said something significant to wide audiences. “All my work questions the establishment, authority, intolerance and prejudice,” he said.
‘Champagne Socialist’
Yet his life was entwined with the establishment. He was made a Commander of the British Empire in 1967. He was knighted in 1976, made a baron in 1993 and given a seat in the House of Lords. He was variously chairman of the British Film Institute, Channel Four Television, Capital Radio and the British Academy of Film and Television Arts and president of the Royal Academy of Dramatic Art.
If his heroes were those who challenged institutions from without, Mr. Attenborough sought to effect change from within. He also led the Actors’ Charitable Trust (now the Actors’ Children’s Trust), which helps actors’ children and actors in old age. He was the moving spirit behind a center offering arts to the disabled in his native Leicester.
He was credited with inspiring Diana, Princess of Wales, whom he coached in public speaking at Prince Charles’s urging, to start her campaign against land mines. In his maiden speech in the House of Lords, he criticized the government for neglecting the arts.
Christopher Hart, writing in The Sunday Times in London, called him “an ennobled Champagne socialist of the old school, a mass of good causes and inconsistencies.” On the set he was known for his genial charm, calling everyone “darling,” however mighty or marginal they were. William Goldman, the screenwriter of “A Bridge Too Far,” called Mr. Attenborough “by far the finest, most decent human being” he had ever met in the movie business.
Richard Samuel Attenborough was born in Cambridge on Aug. 29, 1923, the eldest son of Frederick Attenborough, an Anglo-Saxon scholar who became the principal of University College, Leicester, and his wife, Mary, a writer who crusaded for women’s rights and took in Basque and German refugees. The Attenboroughs adopted two Jewish sisters who had arrived in Britain from Berlin in September 1939, too late for them to be sent safely to relatives in New York.
A Calling to Performance
Unlike his brothers — David, who became a noted biologist and television broadcaster, and John, who went into the auto business — Richard was an academic failure who was happiest when performing in plays. He determined on an acting career, he said, after seeing Chaplin in “The Gold Rush” in 1935 on a trip to London with his father.
“I saw people laughing and crying into their handkerchiefs,” he once said, “and on the train back to Leicester, I said to myself, ‘I want to do that, too.’ ”
Photo
Richard Attenborough attending the Galaxy British Book Awards in London in April 2008.CreditDan Kitwood/Getty Images
Leaving school at 16, he won a scholarship to the Royal Academy of Dramatic Art and eventually married a fellow student, Sheila Sim, who became a well-known actress herself before abandoning the theater to look after their three children and become a magistrate.
Besides his wife and son, Michael, survivors include a daughter, Charlotte Attenborough. Another daughter, Jane Holland, died in the Indian Ocean tsunami of 2004 along with her daughter, Lucy.
Even before he joined the Royal Air Force as a military cameraman in 1943, photographing German-held sites before and after bombing, Mr. Attenborough was performing. He made his professional stage debut while still in school, in 1941, in “Ah, Wilderness!” Noël Coward cast him as a terrified boy sailor in the 1942 film “In Which We Serve,” and he made his West End debut as the bitter young hero in a revival of Clifford Odets’s “Awake and Sing!”
More substantial success came with his role as the teenage Pinkie in “Brighton Rock,” in 1947, followed a year later by a much-praised performance as a working-class adolescent in an elite school in “The Guinea Pig,” renamed “The Outsider” in the United States. By the end of the 1940s he had a fan club of 15,000.
For the next decade and a half, Mr. Attenborough acted primarily in British-made films. Then came “The Great Escape.” Though McQueen was the film’s undeniable star, as a jaunty, rebellious American, Mr. Attenborough turned in a calm but commanding performance as a squadron leader.
Two years later he won a British Academy of Film and Television Arts award for his performance in “Séance on a Wet Afternoon” (1964) as the seedy husband of a neurotic psychic (Kim Stanley) with whom he schemes to kidnap a wealthy girl. The film was one of many he made with his own production company, Beaver Films, formed with the director Bryan Forbes.
Later Roles
He continued to act sporadically in the 1970s — notably as the British serial killer John Christie in “10 Rillington Place” (1971) — and then largely disappeared from the screen until he ended a long hiatus in 1993 with his supporting role in “Jurassic Park.” There were subsequent film roles — among them Kris Kringle in a 1994 remake of “Miracle on 34th Street,” the English ambassador in Kenneth Branagh’s four-hour version of “Hamlet” (1996) and the chief adviser of Elizabeth I (Cate Blanchett) in “Elizabeth” (1998) — but by then Mr. Attenborough was devoting most of his time to directing.
One film he took particular pride in was “Shadowlands” (1993), an elaborate adaptation of William Nicholson’s play about the love affair between C. S. Lewis (Anthony Hopkins) and a divorced American woman (Debra Winger). But he also knew failures, like “In Love and War” (1996), a Hemingway biopic with Chris O’Donnell and Sandra Bullock, and “Grey Owl” (1999), starring Pierce Brosnan as a Canadian trapper.
In his later years Mr. Attenborough was chancellor of the University of Sussex, stepping down in 2008. He returned to directing in 2007 with“Closing the Ring,” a romantic drama starring Shirley MacLaine. But the prospective film that had come to preoccupy him almost as much as “Gandhi,” a biography of Tom Paine, remained unmade at his death.
In 2008, in collaboration with his longstanding associate Diana Hawkins, he published an autobiography, “Entirely Up to You, Darling.” The book chronicles a full and eventful life. But it ends with the death of his daughter and granddaughter in the 2004 tsunami, and his regretting the time he never spent with them.
“Work,” he wrote, “always took precedence.”
Correction: August 26, 2014 
An obituary on Monday about the actor and director Richard Attenborough misstated part of the name of a school where he was a student and later president. It is the Royal Academy of Dramatic Art (not Arts).

2014年8月28日 星期四

黎智英 (2):良知是最有力的感染,身家和金錢來源「從來不神秘」,黎記亂港集團(江春男),滙豐終止黎智英名下公司一帳戶




香港廉政公署人員今早7時,進入壹傳媒集團主席黎智英位於香港何文田嘉道理道的住所,調查4小時後離開。針對此一事件,黎智英與集團主管談話時表示,他們什麼都找不到,便是我最好的聲明。這也是為什麼我們要堅持,否則做豬好了。

黎智英住宅被查,震驚港台兩地,但黎智英說,沒什麼,吃得鹹魚抵得渴,無法子,有立場便有代價,世上從來沒有免費午餐。

許多支持香港真普選的人士也擔心,黎智英會不會繼續被抹黑?勸他應發表聲明。但黎智英很沈靜地說,人民眼睛雪亮,做著對的事,力量便在,因為人心便在。他們最後什麼都找不到便是我最好的聲明。

壹傳媒內同事們對此事件均強烈關注,有人大嘆「佔中前夕,太白色恐怖了」,黎智英告訴同事,這是可以預料的,這也是為什麼我們要堅持。而且做人就是為信念撐到底,這才叫做人,否則做豬好了

黎智英向同事強調說,我不是為誰在做什麼的,是為良知見證人生。我是為我自己,毋須向別人交待。而且等事實走出來,說話最有份量。

香港廉政公署人員這番突然的行動,會不會給佔中帶來陰影?讓一些市民不敢參與佔中?黎智英告訴同事說,我的堅持,別人便感受到力量,我相信他們會上街,良知是最有力的感染。(大陸中心/綜合報導)


遭藏鏡人竊密抹黑 黎智英斥無恥





壹傳媒集團主席黎智英昨首度詳細說明電腦被駭事件。資料照片

【大陸中心╱綜合報導】壹傳媒主席黎智英的電腦上月遭到國家級的駭客攻擊,導致帳目等機密資訊曝光並遭抹黑,他沉默多日,昨透過最新一期《壹週刊》首度詳盡解釋隱私遭竊及政治捐款事件,痛斥幕後黑手「你無恥!」

強調未收美國錢

黎智英表示,駭客是在7月1日竊取他十多年來的帳目和文件,揭發所謂的捐款「醜聞」,他強調從未收過美國的錢,每一分錢「都是做正當生意賺來的」,痛斥幕後黑手「你無恥!」他原本不想解釋、不想理會,但為了不讓身邊友人「陷於不義」,因此破例公開解釋。
黎智英指出,駭客當天強烈攻擊壹傳媒電腦系統,同時竊取他的私人帳目和文件,還包括沒有存放於電腦、但經影印的文件,因影印機有連接網路以備做紀錄,故也遭竊。
黎智英說,駭客將這些檔案和文件抽絲剝繭後,揭發所謂的「醜聞」,也就是他捐款給香港泛民政黨、智庫與一些宗教團體和人士的紀錄。 

身家來源不神秘

黎智英認為,這個「醜聞」是對他的人格肯定,不是什麼醜聞。他強調,自己的身家和金錢來源「從來不神秘」,創辦的企業皆有公開稅務資料可查詢,指控他拿美國人的錢更是污衊,「我擁有的每一分錢都是做正當生意賺來的,如任何人有異議,請拿出證據來!」 

滙豐終止黎智英名下公司一帳戶

014-08-14  06:53
〔本報訊〕媒體報導,去年10月香港匯豐銀行以「行政理由」,不預警單方終止壹傳媒集團主席黎智英名下一家公司在該行開設的帳戶,黎曾經由該帳戶匯出多筆鉅款資助緬甸反對派人士。針對媒體採訪,匯豐發言人表示,不會公開評論客戶資料,壹傳媒在該媒體出刊前也未做出回應。
  • 壹傳媒集團主席黎智英。(資料照,記者劉信德攝)
    壹傳媒集團主席黎智英。(資料照,記者劉信德攝)
《東方日報》今日以頭版,斗大標題「匯豐終止黎智英戶口」,大篇幅報導壹傳媒集團主席黎智英名下一家公司帳戶被終止,報導指出,被滙豐終止帳戶的公司為「公明織造廠有限公司」(Comitex Knitters Ltd),是黎智英創立並全資擁有的毛衣公司。該公司近年已沒實質業務,惟黎一直保留該公司,疑似專為秘密匯款到外國之用。
該媒體也引述先前媒體揭露,黎智英捐款對象包括,去年6月透過該公司在滙豐的帳戶,先後分4次向緬甸反對派人士Yuza Maw Htoon匯款,單據聲稱款項是用於支付在緬甸印製的20萬件T恤。該4次匯款的總金額高達22萬美元,折合港幣約171萬元。由於緬甸設有外匯管制,故黎一般是向Yuza Maw Htoon在新加坡銀行的帳戶匯款。同年7月底及8月底,黎智英又透過該帳戶,分兩次共匯款21萬美元給緬甸反對派人士,聲稱用作電視廣告費。
媒體報導,滙豐去年10月發信黎智英名下公司,以「行政理由」(administrative reasons)單方面終止其帳戶。30天後正式生效,促請該公司在期限內盡快提取帳戶內資產,並將帳戶的信託、投資指示等轉移至其他帳戶,而有關存取費用將由公明織造廠承擔,銀行一律不會負責。不過,密件沒有交代公明織造廠是否提出反對及在滙豐重開帳戶,以及黎智英最終將資產轉往甚麼地方。

司馬觀點:黎記亂港集團(江春男)




更多專欄文章








壹傳媒老闆黎智英,最近被揭發過去兩年來,向民主派陣營捐助四千多萬元港幣,立法會內部開始展開調查,建制派要求廉政公署介入,親中媒體對民主派大加撻伐,對肥佬大肆抹黑,卻一字不提非法侵入私人電郵的問題。
有趣的是《大公報》,它稱「黎記」亂港集團,「是香港一切分歧、對立與衝突的亂源」,「有黎記一天,港人不會有和諧,不會有法治,巿民不會有好日子過」。「任何不希望香港再沉淪下去的人士,都必須正視這一嚴峻事實,而且要採取一切必要、可行的措施加以制止」。看它的遣詞用字,彷彿紅衛兵重出江湖。

「反佔中」踐踏法治

當年他們稱國民黨為「蔣記」反動集團,如今,香港淪為外國勢力的反華基地,壹傳媒則被定性為「黎記亂港集團」,這是中共一貫的鬥爭手法。但是,黎智英自掏腰包,每分錢都是自己賺的,他不圖私利,不犯法,更不怕被抹黑,反而公開呼籲更多商人跟他一樣勇於捐獻。
香港和台灣不同,對政治很冷漠,小額捐款很少,但全靠大額捐獻,難以激發社會熱情。
這個「捐款門」對某些政客有殺傷力,他們有的說謊,有的急於撇清,社會形象受損。榮休樞機主教陳日君收六百萬元,陳方安生收三百五十萬元,這一大筆錢如何使用,可能會被追究。此外,施明德因收到二十萬元,作為佔中取經費用,也受到魚池之殃。
其實,佔中運動引起廣泛共鳴,揭發「黎記集團」,不可能阻擋港人對民主普選的追求。相反的,如今進行得如火如荼的「反佔中」運動,不斷踐踏法治精神,收窄自由空間,破壞了香港的核心價值。 

2014年8月27日 星期三

John G. Sperling, For-Profit College Pioneer, Dies at 93









  1. New York Times ‎- 1 day ago
    John GSperling, a pioneer of for-profit education who turned a $26,000 investment into the multibillion-dollar University of Phoenix, calling ...



John G. Sperling dies at 93; founder of University of Phoenix


Even critics agree that John Sperling’s vision transformed higher education, which has adopted many of his innovative ideas, particularly distance learning. (Scott Troyanos / Associated Press)
By ELAINE WOOcontact the reporter
Obituaries

John Sperling built University of Phoenix into one of the world's largest private education systems
University of Phoenix has an enrollment of 241,000 students, many of them virtual learners



John G. Sperling, a poor boy from the Missouri Ozarks who survived a cruel childhood to become a college professor and a billionaire with an idea for a university that launched a revolution in higher education, has died. He was 93.

The self-described "unintentional entrepreneur" who founded the for-profit behemoth University of Phoenix, Sperling died Friday of complications following an infection at Marin General Hospital in Greenbrae, Calif., said former University of Phoenix President Jorge Klor de Alva. Sperling had homes in the Bay Area and Arizona.
I can't think of an individual who has single-handedly created more viable higher education opportunities for more individuals than John Sperlin.- Guilbert Hentschke, chairman emeritus of USC's Rossier School of Education


Sperling was a tenured professor at San Jose State University in 1972 when he hit on the idea of an alternative institution for adult learners whose needs were not being met by traditional colleges and universities. He formally founded University of Phoenix in the mid-1970s after moving to Arizona and built the business into one of the world's largest private higher education systems.

It now has an enrollment of 241,000 students, many of them virtual learners who never step inside a classroom.

"He had an enormous impact," said professor William G. Tierney, an expert on for-profit education who co-directs USC's Pullias Center for Higher Education. "What he realized was there were working adults who wanted to take classes at a convenient time and location and who were willing to pay money for it.... As an idea, it was really quite remarkable."
lRelatedOBITUARIESSal Castro dies at 79; L.A. teacher played role in 1968 protestsSEE ALL RELATED
8



Although profit-making schools had existed for 100 years, mainly for people seeking to learn a trade, Sperling greatly expanded the concept, creating a degree-granting institution that aimed for the breadth of any conventional university. His efforts met with ridicule from academics and state regulators who said it was unethical to make a profit off students and derided him for lowering standards for a diploma. Critics dubbed Sperling's enterprise "McUniversity."

On the verge of bankruptcy several times in the early years, Sperling persevered because, he insisted, profits were the ultimate measure of education success.

"For years the troops would say, 'Sperling, are you in this to improve education or make money?' And I had a mantra: If we don't make money, we won't improve education. You understand that? You have to have money to survive," he told the Arizona Republic in 2000.

Nearly 40 years later, it still has many detractors, including government officials concerned about low graduation rates and other high student loan default rates. But even critics agree that Sperling's vision transformed higher education, which has adopted many of his innovative ideas, particularly distance learning. The for-profit sector now comprises 11% of higher education in the U.S., Tierney said.


"He was a man who was not afraid of anything but boredom," said Klor de Alva, who knew Sperling for more than 40 years.Sperling was also an iconoclast outside the education sphere. His wealth enabled him to pursue offbeat causes, from financing initiatives to decriminalize marijuana use to research that could extend human life. He even backed a company to clone pets, eventually succeeding at replicating his beloved dog, Missy.

One of six children, John Glen Sperling was born on Jan. 9, 1921, in a log cabin in Willow Springs, Mo. His childhood was an ordeal. When he was 7 he developed pneumonia and required surgery to drain his lung. The doctors operated on him using only a local anesthetic, rendering him so weak he was in bed for a year.
cComments
Got something to say? Start the conversation and be the first to comment.ADD A COMMENT
0



He said his mother was the most important person in his life, while describing his father as a failed farmer who regularly beat him. When Sperling was about 10 he warned his father that if he ever hit him again he would kill him in his sleep. The beatings stopped. When he was 15, his father died. Sperling called that day "the happiest day of my life" in his memoir, "Rebel With a Cause" (2000).

He graduated from high school unable to read, finding out much later that he was dyslexic. His real education began when he joined the merchant marine and was introduced to literature by fellow sailors, who lent him works by F. Scott Fitzgerald and Dostoyevsky as well as political tracts by Marx. He embraced socialism.

After serving in the Army Air Forces, he earned a bachelor's degree from Oregon's Reed College in 1948. He received a master's in psychology from UC Berkeley and, in 1955, a doctorate in 18th-century English mercantile history from King's College at the University of Cambridge.


John G. Sperling was a tenured San Jose State professor in 1972 when he hit on the idea of an alternative institution for adult learners whose needs were not being met by traditional colleges. (Associated Press)

He was hired to teach at Ohio State University but grew to loathe academic culture, especially faculty parties featuring "either a tuna or a macaroni casserole and cheap red wine," he wrote in his memoir.

In 1960 he moved to San Jose State to teach humanities. He led a faculty strike in support of black studies programs that turned many of his colleagues into enemies.

Although a fiasco from a labor organizing standpoint, it taught Sperling an important lesson. "Ignore your detractors and those who say that what you are doing is wrong, against regulations, or illegal," he wrote.

In 1972 he ran a federally funded project to teach police officers and schoolteachers about juvenile delinquency. When his students told him they wished they could take more classes and earn degrees, Sperling pitched the idea to his superiors. They shot it down.


Convinced he could succeed, Sperling took a leave of absence and approached the University of San Francisco, which saw his experiment as a potential boon to its ailing finances. Taking $26,000 in savings, Sperling affiliated with the university and started the Institute for Community Research and Development in 1974. It quickly gained popularity with evening and weekend classes convenient for working adults and an egalitarian approach that banned lectures, emphasizing learning as a partnership between teacher and student.

In 1976 he moved to Arizona, which had few regulations to stymie his expansion. Although Arizona officials and members of the higher education establishment fought his efforts to gain accreditation, he prevailed and named his enterprise University of Phoenix.

In 1989 he bought a defunct distance-learning company, laying the foundation for a boom in online learning as the Internet began to expand. By the early 2000s Phoenix Online was generating millions of dollars in revenue, and online learning has been embraced by traditional colleges and universities.

"I can't think of an individual who has single-handedly created more viable higher education opportunities for more individuals than John Sperling," said Guilbert Hentschke, chairman emeritus of USC's Rossier School of Education.


Sperling later renamed the company Apollo Education Group. After taking it public in 1994, enrollment and revenue grew wildly and so did its founder's personal wealth. By 2006 Forbes said his fortune exceeded $1 billion in revenue. The Chronicle of Education described the maverick as "perhaps the wealthiest educator in history."

He retired in 2004, only to return two years later as executive chairman. He retired again in 2012.
lRelatedOBITUARIESSal Castro dies at 79; L.A. teacher played role in 1968 protestsSEE ALL RELATED
8



His survivors include his son, Peter, who is company chairman. Twice divorced (he once described himself as "not co-habitable"), he is also survived by two grandchildren, his longtime companion, Joan Hawthorne, and Missy 2, the clone of his long-departed dog.

elaine.woo@latimes.com.

Twitter: @ewooLATimes

章立凡,許玉秀(3): 照顧失智媽媽










......錢穆先生認為中國歷史上的蒙元和滿清,是兩個最自私的部族政權,因這兩個游牧少數民族創立的朝代,都是由血緣族群所把持。另一位歷史學家余英時先生將其定義為「族天下」。
這種由一個群體執掌權力並世代分享血酬的政治形態,與後來的「黨天下」十分相似,其實就是擴大了的「家天下」。

從普選之爭看文明衝突(北京獨立學者 章立凡)
全國人大常委會審議香港特首的政改報告結局,將對香港的未來產生不可估量的影響。「事緩則圓」,此前我一直...
HK.APPLE.NEXTMEDIA.COM



全國人大常委會審議香港特首的政改報告結局,將對香港的未來產生不可估量的影響。「事緩則圓」,此前我一直希望人大常委會將此項議程擱置到中共十八屆四中全會後,當下大陸政局處於高度敏感的階段,顯然不是對香港問題做出決斷的最好時機。
中共習慣於「黨領導一切」的傳統思路,不容香港政治有任何超越其掌控的可能;他們擔心香港真普選可能在大陸民間引發骨牌效應,導致局面進一步失控,必須堅持嚴防死守。人大常委會僅僅是一顆橡皮圖章,廟堂袞袞諸公是否意識到,僵硬地否決港人的民意訴求所引發的公民抗爭,也可能在大陸激發骨牌效應,反過來影響高層的權力博弈。
或許某些中共人士認為:「不怕,老子有槍。」大不了出動駐港部隊宣佈緊急狀態。這種想法一點不奇怪,在中共歷史辭典裏,天下是打出來的不是選出來的。這種迷信暴力傳統由來已久,「弓馬得天下」的大清到末年,攝政王載灃回應張之洞對時局擔憂時也是這句:「不怕,有兵在。」
歷史學家錢穆先生認為中國歷史上的蒙元和滿清,是兩個最自私的部族政權,因這兩個游牧少數民族創立的朝代,都是由血緣族群所把持。另一位歷史學家余英時先生將其定義為「族天下」。這種由一個群體執掌權力並世代分享血酬的政治形態,與後來的「黨天下」十分相似,其實就是擴大了的「家天下」。
某些大陸高官很有游牧民族征服者心態,將香港視為一塊天朝從夷狄手中收回的肥沃疆土,可不按規則地予取予求。這種心態之所以比航海民族殖民者還要糟糕,蓋因殖民者懂得養雞下蛋,而征服者卻往往只懂得殺雞取卵。
資本主義文明最講究契約精神,農耕文明次之,而游牧民族歷史上背盟紀錄最多。近代以來香港社會繁榮發展,背景是源自西方世界商業文明。香港資本主義制度下的法律體系和地方自治傳統,不僅與中國封建專制主義的農耕文明格格不入,更與列寧主義、史太林主義暴力傳統下的黨文化相互衝突。
中共建政前不僅祖述馬恩列史,也曾倡導普世價值、憲政和普選。1937年中共陝甘寧邊區委員會發佈《民主政府施政綱領》,承諾實行普選制度與議會制度。1939年1月中共《陝甘寧邊區抗戰時期施政綱領》規定採用「直接、普遍、平等、不記名的選舉制」,選民可直接選出被選舉人。中共領袖毛澤東、周恩來多次倡導「新民主主義憲政」和「政治民主化,軍隊國家化」。
1949年建政時,中共承諾建立聯合政府,保留私人資本主義工商業10年至15年甚至20年;但僅3、4年後毛澤東就背約,廢棄聯合政府框架,提前實行「對資改造」;其後弁髦憲法,發動各種政治運動,踐踏人權無所不用其極。直至今日,普世價值、憲政和普選在大陸仍是禁區。
長期一黨專政使中共政治競爭能力退化,全憑高壓維穩掌控權力;同時也失去了政黨特質,逐步蛻化成為一個政權。外無競爭的後果是黨內矛盾激化,殘酷的權力鬥爭周而復始,至今仍在歷史怪圈中不能自拔。
政黨生命力在於競爭。中共執政64年卻一直致力於消滅競爭,同時消滅一切可能的競爭者。怕競爭、重掌控的糾結心態,也是中共在香港普選爭拗中進退失據的重要原因。從強調「全面管治權」到以「宣佈緊急狀態」相威脅,越是恐懼政治競爭,就越迷信暴力工具。
「港人治港,高度自治」的一國兩制承諾,原是為海峽兩岸「和平統一」做給台灣的示範。「50年不變」的愛情婚約,僅僅17年變得讓人不敢相認。基本法會不會變成白條?「佔中」抗爭會不會導致六四重演,甚至再度引發中共與整個主流文明世界的對抗?歷史的經驗值得注意。

章立凡
北京獨立學者

Wikipedia
1950年,章立凡出生在北京市,曾經用名立凡,父親是中央人民政府糧食部部長章乃器,曾在清華附中讀書。[1][2] 1957年,章乃器同章伯鈞儲安平羅隆基中國政府劃分為四大右派,毛澤東將章乃器、章伯鈞和羅隆基劃分為右派的老祖宗。[1][2] 1957年6月8日,中共中央刊布《關於組織力量準備反擊右派分子進攻的指示》,《人民日報》發表社論《這是為什麼?》,隨後《新聞日報》刊布《關於「特殊材料製成的」——和章乃器先生商榷》,章乃器被徹底打倒,經常被拉去參加各種形式的批鬥會,那時章立凡才7歲,父母已經分居。「文化大革命」中章乃器遭到衝擊,章立凡因父親身份的緣故也受到株連,曾遭關押。[1][2] 1977年5月13日,其父章乃器在北京醫院地下室含冤病逝。[1][2] 文革結束之後,章立凡考入中國社科院近代史研究所,從事中國近代史研究。1989六四天安門事件中國共產黨屠殺大量學生和民眾,章立凡應中共中央統戰部的邀請,參與調停學潮。事件結束後,章立凡受到壓力,脫離體製成為獨立學者。[1][2]

思想[編輯]

人民和公民[編輯]

章立凡認為由於中國教育模式的天然缺陷,不允許獨立思考者的存在,導致中國只有人民,沒有公民,從而形成了今天的中國政治體制。[1][2][3]

維權和維穩[編輯]

章立凡認為政府一面侵害公民利益製造矛盾和不穩定,一面又用維穩來攫取更大利益,從而導致政府公信力喪失殆盡,「用納稅人的錢監控納稅人,是最愚蠢的政治」。[1][2][4]

革命和改良[編輯]

章立凡不希望中國爆發革命,對於社會上以暴易暴的現象深表憂心,而改良變革的中國政治體制才有希望避免革命。[1][2]

作品[編輯]

  • 《君子之交如水》. 北京市: 作家出版社. 2007: 290. ISBN 9787506338585 (中文(中國大陸)‎).
  • 《記憶:往事未付紅塵》. 陝西省: 陝西師範大學出版社. 2004: 388. ISBN 9787561330586 (中文(中國大陸)‎).





刑法學者照顧失智媽媽 許玉秀玩鬥智

國內知名刑法學者許玉秀。
記者蘇健忠攝影 
國內知名刑法學者、前大法官許玉秀,她85歲的媽媽罹患失智症已經八年有餘,不同於一般失智症家屬聊起照顧家人的心酸難過,許玉秀在受訪過程中,一派輕鬆、笑聲不斷。她正面看待母親生病的事實,「認識並接受」,更將照顧母親的辛苦,轉化為享受親情、當成是來自母親的禮物。許玉秀從德國取得博士學位回國教書以來,一直與母親同住,她說,在50歲以前都是媽媽在照顧她。她是在民國95年初發現母親有失智症傾向。有一天媽媽一再催促她用餐,許玉秀正和以前的同事講電話而沒有立刻下樓,媽媽忍不住拿起電話大聲催促她。等到掛了電話,她跟媽媽說,還好剛剛不是現在的同事,否則不是讓她很沒面子嗎?哪裡知道,媽媽竟矢口否認:「我一早到現在連電話筒都沒碰一下。」
展開搶救媽媽大作戰
原本以為媽媽是賴皮不承認,許玉秀不斷告訴媽媽就是5分鐘前的事,然而,媽媽一再否認,幾番來回爭辯之後,許玉秀心中一愣想道:「莫非媽媽完全忘記曾經拿起話筒?」那一頓飯之後,許玉秀心中忐忑,立刻向醫療常識比較豐富的朋友請教。一周後她帶著媽媽去台大醫院神經內科門診,就這樣開始了照顧失智媽媽的故事,許玉秀稱之為「搶救媽媽大作戰」。
得知「失智症」診斷結果之後,許玉秀開始想起這幾年偶爾感到怪異的現象。過去一兩年來,媽媽特別頻繁地談童年生活,而且一再重複;經常在廚房刷洗燒焦的鍋子;冰箱裡,塞滿滿從菜市場買來的菜,冷凍庫已經滿到門都快關不上了,還經常留著隔餐剩菜,忘記熱食,也忘記丟掉。
煮飯、買菜成了困擾

國內知名刑法學者許玉秀,常和許媽媽丟球,一方面運動,一方面讓媽媽數數。
圖/許玉秀提供 
許玉秀警覺燒焦的鍋子來自忘了關爐火,這麼危險的事,讓她成日惴惴不安。首先想到救急之策,儘量不要讓媽媽做飯,這樣可以減少用火的風險,許玉秀於是每天下班訂菜外帶回家,只讓媽媽用電鍋煮飯。
但許媽媽還是找藉口去市場,從一星期一次,變成幾乎天天上市場。每次都說明天就不去了,但是明天還是照去。而且經常付了錢,忘記帶東西回家,或者付了錢忘記找錢。許玉秀笑著說,她猜測媽媽那麼頻繁上市場,必然因為生意人對她特別殷勤。想想付了大鈔可以不用找零,付了錢東西不會帶走,甚至相同的東西,在一攤買了,到了下一攤,只要攤販再招呼,媽媽照樣再買,看在菜販眼裡,母親就像個「闊氣的老太太」,自然要特別巴結,於是上菜場這麼開心的事,當然要天天做。
那個時候,經常看見媽媽拎兩、三個高麗菜進門,問媽媽怎麼買那麼多?她都不經意地回答「看到就買呀!」母親這樣不斷進貨,冰箱堆得滿滿都是菜,所有的叮嚀都沒用,弄得許玉秀自己情緒緊繃,大約兩周後,發現自己情緒快要失控,才警覺處理方法錯誤。
接管廚房 成功「奪權」
靜心一想,許玉秀意識到媽媽的情況是不會改善的,而就算多買食材,有什麼關係?只要能送走就可以。於是打電話請兄嫂買菜前,先來家裡搬貨。暗中進行幾次之後,有一次她告訴媽媽,家裡食材太多,要讓哥哥來帶走一些,媽媽很高興,以為從此可以光明正大買菜。誰知道再次通知哥哥來搬貨時,媽媽突然翻臉了:「我走那麼遠的路,那麼辛苦提回家,妳都把它們送人,我不要去買了。」
果真,許媽媽就不上菜市場了,沒想到,這個問題竟這麼容易就解決了。且為根本防災,索性改造廚房,不再使用瓦斯爐,改用電磁爐,讓廚房完全電氣化,母親因為不知如何使用,許玉秀得以完全接管廚房,她得意地說,這叫奪權成功。
因為每天都藏錢包,許媽媽每天都在找錢包,有一回,媽媽已經找錢包找了一個小時,她要媽媽先吃飯,媽媽竟說:「找不到錢包,我從此不吃飯,餓死算了。」這個宣言,讓許玉秀警覺到非把錢包找到不可。她知道失智症患者有罹患憂鬱症的風險,當時她心想無論如何,不能讓媽媽陷入極端的情緒中,否則就很難照顧了。總算在半個鐘頭以後找到錢包,解除危機。
媽媽肯定地說:「我幸福! 」
維持情緒的穩定和愉悅,對減緩失智症的退化、改善生活品質,非常重要。許玉秀說,她的武功秘訣就是「把母親當成女兒照顧」,這是在許媽媽診斷出失智症傾向時,她就給自己的心理建設。於是要出門時,都跟媽媽說:「要打扮漂亮一點,才會討人喜歡」;每天要摟著媽媽親幾十次,跟媽媽說幾十次:「媽媽妳好漂亮、媽媽你好可愛。」許玉秀說,如果有人天天真心誠意地稱讚你很漂亮、很可愛,怎麼可能會心情不好?當然是天天開心呀!
許玉秀經常利用問答測試媽媽的理解能力,媽媽的回答經常初一十五不一樣,例如問媽媽漂不漂亮或可不可愛,答案有時候肯定,有時候否定。許媽媽有時候還會說許玉秀是她的妹妹或小學同學。但是有一個答案至今沒有改變,就是當許玉秀問:「媽媽你幸不幸福時,媽媽至今都會肯定地點頭說:『幸福!』 」
聯合晚報與天主教失智老人基金會合作,推出名人談失智系列專訪 「不能遺忘的故事」,每周一刊出 ,如想獲得更多失智症資訊,或需諮詢及協助,可電洽基金會。諮詢電話:(02)2332-0992,網址:http://www.cfad.org.tw

網誌存檔