Presidential approval polls
Polls from “select pollsters” meet certain criteria for reliability and are shown with a diamond.
All pollsters
Select pollsters
PollsterSponsorNet marginApproveDisapprove poll from
YouGovconducted March 21 to 24
March 21-24 Economist Disapprove +2 48% 50% New poll from
YouGovconducted March 19 to 23
March 19-23New Yahoo News Disapprove +6 44% 50%
poll from
Ipsosconducted March 20 to 22
March 20-22 Reuters Disapprove +6 45% 51% poll from
Morning Consultconducted March 20 to 22
March 20-22 Disapprove +3 47% 50%
poll from
American Research Groupconducted March 16 to 19
March 16-19 Disapprove +5 46% 51% poll from
RMG Researchconducted March 11 to 18
March 11-18 Napolitan News Service Approve +8 53% 45% poll from
YouGovconducted March 15 to 17
March 15-17 Economist Disapprove +4 47% 51% poll from
Navigator Researchconducted March 12 to 16
March 12-16 Disapprove +2 47% 49%
poll from
Beacon Research/Shaw & Company Researchconducted March 13 to 16
March 13-16 Fox News Disapprove +2 49% 51%
New poll from
Gallupconducted March 2 to 15
March 2-15New Disapprove +10 43% 53% poll from
Morning Consultconducted March 13 to 15
March 13-15 Disapprove +2 48% 50% poll from
Blueprint Pollingconducted March 12 to 13
March 12-13 Disapprove +6 45% 51% poll from
RMG Researchconducted March 5 to 12
March 5-12 Napolitan News Service Approve +10 54% 44% poll from
Echelon Insightsconducted March 9 to 12
March 9-12 Approve +1 49% 48%
poll from
AtlasIntelconducted March 6 to 11
March 6-11 Disapprove +5 47% 52%
‹ Previous
1 to 15 of 113 polls
Next ›
Ruth IgielnikStaff editor, polling
Welcome to our new tracker for polls of President Trump’s approval rating. Over the coming weeks, you can expect us to add more features, including charts showing how the average of the latest polls has changed over time.
About the data
Source: Polls collected by The New York Times.
Unless otherwise noted, the data sets that power this project are created by The New York Times and are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Use of these data sets is subject to the terms and conditions of this license, including but not limited to the attribution requirements. These data sets are offered as-is and as-available, and The New York Times does not make any representations or warranties, express or implied, concerning these data sets. If you are migrating from the FiveThirtyEight dataset, known differences are documented here.Presidential approval, Jan. 20, 2025, to present: Download
Pollsters that meet at least two of the three criteria below are considered “select pollsters” by The Times, as long as they are conducting polls for nonpartisan sponsors.Has a track record of accuracy in recent electionsIs a member of a professional polling organizationConducts probability-based sampling
Polls that were conducted by or for partisan organizations are labeled, as they often release results that are favorable only to their causes. Margins are calculated using unrounded vote shares when available.
The Times also conducts its own polls in partnership with Siena College. Follow Times/Siena polling here.
Presidential approval polls
Polls from “select pollsters” meet certain criteria for reliability and are shown with a diamond.
| Pollster | Sponsor | Net margin | Approve | Disapprove | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disapprove +2 | 48% | 50% | ||||
| Disapprove +6 | 44% | 50% | ||||
| Disapprove +6 | 45% | 51% | ||||
| Disapprove +3 | 47% | 50% | ||||
| Disapprove +5 | 46% | 51% | ||||
| Approve +8 | 53% | 45% | ||||
| Disapprove +4 | 47% | 51% | ||||
| Disapprove +2 | 47% | 49% | ||||
| Disapprove +2 | 49% | 51% | ||||
| Disapprove +10 | 43% | 53% | ||||
| Disapprove +2 | 48% | 50% | ||||
| Disapprove +6 | 45% | 51% | ||||
| Approve +10 | 54% | 44% | ||||
| Approve +1 | 49% | 48% | ||||
| Disapprove +5 | 47% | 52% | ||||
Welcome to our new tracker for polls of President Trump’s approval rating. Over the coming weeks, you can expect us to add more features, including charts showing how the average of the latest polls has changed over time.
About the data
Source: Polls collected by The New York Times.
Unless otherwise noted, the data sets that power this project are created by The New York Times and are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Use of these data sets is subject to the terms and conditions of this license, including but not limited to the attribution requirements. These data sets are offered as-is and as-available, and The New York Times does not make any representations or warranties, express or implied, concerning these data sets. If you are migrating from the FiveThirtyEight dataset, known differences are documented here.Presidential approval, Jan. 20, 2025, to present: Download
Pollsters that meet at least two of the three criteria below are considered “select pollsters” by The Times, as long as they are conducting polls for nonpartisan sponsors.Has a track record of accuracy in recent electionsIs a member of a professional polling organizationConducts probability-based sampling
Polls that were conducted by or for partisan organizations are labeled, as they often release results that are favorable only to their causes. Margins are calculated using unrounded vote shares when available.
The Times also conducts its own polls in partnership with Siena College. Follow Times/Siena polling here.
川普是歐洲最重要的極右翼領導人的一個問題
經濟學家網
The more his blustering brand of nationalism seems damaging to Europe, the more voters in Italy and France may doubt its local versions
economist.com
Trump is a problem for Europe’s most important hard-right leaders
Wing women
Videos
很優秀的英文片
26:06
Leni Riefenstahl: The Horrible Power of Images
YouTube · DW History and Culture
Jan 19, 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgUCdzc3Qe8
問：你一生追求的目標是什麼？
答：能夠長長久久地工作下去。
問：是什麼讓你一直不停工作?為什麼不想退休？
答：平靜和休養的日子多無聊啊，我無法忍受。
問：你最感到驕傲的作品是那一部？
答：一九三六年拍的奧林匹克運動會。
問：你一生最後悔的事情是什麼？
答：那一年遇見希特勒。
這位一代德意志奇女子，活過一百零一年，也活過世人少有的傳奇人生。她的人生真的精采，奇特，瑰麗以及詭異。
她便是德國知名的女導演蘭妮．萊芬斯坦。上述的問答是萊芬斯坦百歲生日那天回答一位記者提問時說的。隔年，她便與世長辭了。
我不諱言自己對她的興趣，我深受她那強烈的個性和少有才華吸引。她不但是希特勒所愛的女人之一、納粹美學精神代表、最具政治爭議性的歷史性人物，也是百年來最重要的攝影家、導演和演員。
萊芬斯坦集才藝及美貌於一身，少女時期先是學習繪畫，畫風自成一格，但卻以舞藝聞名，多年受邀在歐洲各大城市劇院跳舞，廿出頭便投入電影事業，她自導自演的電影《藍光》受到希特勒垂青，從此為希特勒拍攝文宣片如《奧林匹亞》或《意志的勝利》。
萊芬斯坦被納粹領導人捧上第三帝國的天堂，但在二次大戰結束後卻墮入地獄。她被迫出席戰後審判聽證會，四十場沒完沒了的官司，隨後隱居慕尼黑，度過二十年貧困生活，但她對自己為納粹黨拍宣傳片一事至死沒有悔恨也無良心不安。
她說，「我對初崛起的希特勒印象很好，我不知道他後來會仇殺那麼多猶太人。」她稱自己為希特勒拍攝的影片是「純粹的紀錄片，不是宣傳作品」；她甚至說，「我對真相沒有興趣，我只對美的事物有興趣。」
她說，她自己「並不仇恨猶太人，」她也有猶太朋友，甚至啟用猶太演員。但她認識的猶太朋友卻毫不留情地批評她，「只會利用別人，成就自己」，當年她確實找來猶太演員，但電影拍完，她又把他們丟回集中營。也有從集中營倖存回來的猶裔人士氣急敗壞地說：她的罪惡之大，將之剁千刀都不為過!
我曾住在慕尼黑史坦伯格湖畔，我是她的鄰居。我曾多次經過她家，從湖這邊眺望她的住處，我曾坐在湖邊西西公主旅館的咖啡座喝咖啡，因為她也在這裡喝咖啡。我總是在回想她的一生，她做對了什麼？又做錯了什麼？
做為一代藝術家，她的命運未免過於離奇古怪。那麼多年，德國境內媒體不敢提起她的名字，她的名字沉重，陰魂不散，而國際媒體都說她是不死的納粹，希特勒的幫兇。死時還被人說活該，早就該死了。
如果她的攝影風格是法西斯式美學，她的法西斯美學卻無孔不入，影響了當代無數的藝術家。
我在想，那年她若沒遇見希特勒，她的人生會如何？
（全文請見《蘭妮．萊芬斯坦回憶錄》）
- Riefenstahl, Leni (1995). Leni Riefenstahl: a memoir. New York: Picador. ISBN 9780312119263. (reviewed by bell hooks[115])
蘭妮．萊芬斯坦回憶錄
eni Riefenstahl：Memoiren
黃柳霜 Anna May Wong | |
|---|---|
 約攝於1935年 | |
| 女演員 | |
| 英文名 | Anna May Wong |
| 出生 | 黃柳霜 （Wong Liu-tsong） 1905年1月3日 |
| 逝世 | 1961年2月2日（56歲） |
取自維基百科，自由的百科全書
萊妮·里芬斯塔爾
1935 年的里芬斯塔爾
出生名為海倫·貝爾塔·阿瑪莉·
里芬斯塔爾
1902 年 8 月 22 日
德意志帝國普魯士王國柏林
2003 年 9 月 8 日逝世（享年 101 歲）
德國 波金格
慕尼黑 Waldfriedhof 安息之地
公民 德國蘇丹
職業 電影導演製片編劇編輯攝影師女演員
活躍年代：1925–2002
代表作品：《意志的勝利》《奧林匹亞蒂夫蘭》
配偶 Eugen Karl “Peter” Jacob
號
（1944 年結婚；1946 年離婚）
合夥人 Horst Kettner [fr]（自 1968 年起）
網站 leni-riefenstahl.de
簽名
海倫·貝爾塔·阿瑪莉·“萊尼”·里芬斯塔爾（德語：[ˈleː.niː ˈʁiː.fn̩.ʃtaːl] ⓘ；1902 年 8 月 22 日 - 2003 年 9 月 8 日）是德國作家、製片人、製片人、攝影師和攝影師。她被認為是電影史上最具爭議的人物之一。許多評論家視她為一位“創新的電影製作人和富有創造力的唯美主義者”，[1]但她的作品在納粹時期為宣傳服務而受到批評。 [2][3][4]
里芬斯塔爾是一位天才的游泳選手和藝術家，她從小就對舞蹈產生興趣，並曾上過舞蹈課，並在歐洲各地表演。在看到 1924 年電影《命運之山》的宣傳海報後，她受到啟發，開始從事演藝事業，並在 1925 年至 1929 年間主演了五部成功的電影。 1932年，里芬斯塔爾決定嘗試執導自己的電影《藍光》，成為魏瑪共和國時期德國少數的執導電影的女性之一。 [5]
在1930年代後半期，她執導了納粹宣傳片《意志的勝利》（1935年）和《奧林匹亞》（1938年），引起了全世界的關注和讚譽。廣泛認為這兩部影片是有史以來最有效、最有創新感的宣傳影片。然而，她參與《意志的勝利》嚴重損害了她在二戰後的職業生涯和聲譽。阿道夫·希特勒在至少三部重要的納粹電影的製作過程中與里芬斯塔爾密切合作，並建立了友好關係。 [6][7]
戰後，里芬斯塔爾被捕並被發現是納粹“同路人”，但並未被指控犯有戰爭罪。 [8]在她的晚年，她一直否認知道大屠殺，並被批評為「『我們怎麼會知道？』的代言人。」防禦。 」[9][10][11] 里芬斯塔爾的戰後作品包括一本自傳和兩本關於南蘇丹努巴人的攝影書籍
Leni Riefenstahl | |
|---|---|
 Riefenstahl in 1935 | |
| Born | Helene Bertha Amalie Riefenstahl 22 August 1902 Berlin, Kingdom of Prussia, German Empire |
| Died | 8 September 2003 (aged 101) Pöcking, Germany |
| Resting place | Munich Waldfriedhof |
| Citizenship |
|
| Occupations |
|
| Years active | 1925–2002 |
| Known for | |
| Spouse | Eugen Karl "Peter" Jacob (m. 1944; div. 1946) |
| Partner | Horst Kettner (from 1968) |
| Website | leni-riefenstahl |
| Signature | |
 | |
Helene Bertha Amalie "Leni" Riefenstahl (German: [ˈleː.niː ˈʁiː.fn̩.ʃtaːl] ⓘ; 22 August 1902 – 8 September 2003) was a German film director, producer, writer, editor, photographer and actress. She is considered one of the most controversial personalities in film history. Regarded by many critics as an "innovative filmmaker and creative aesthete",[1] she is also criticized for her works in the service of propaganda during the Nazi era.[2][3][4]
A talented swimmer and an artist, Riefenstahl became interested in dancing during her childhood, taking lessons and performing across all Europe. After seeing a promotional poster for the 1924 film Mountain of Destiny, she was inspired to move into acting and between 1925 and 1929 starred in five successful motion pictures. Riefenstahl became one of the few women in Germany to direct a film during the Weimar era when, in 1932, she decided to try directing with her own film, The Blue Light.[5]
In the latter half of the 1930s, she directed the Nazi propaganda films Triumph of the Will (1935) and Olympia (1938), resulting in worldwide attention and acclaim. The films are widely considered two of the most effective and technically innovative propaganda films ever made. Her involvement in Triumph of the Will, however, significantly damaged her career and reputation after World War II. Adolf Hitler closely collaborated with Riefenstahl during the production of at least three important Nazi films, and they formed a friendly relationship.[6][7]
After the war, Riefenstahl was arrested and found to be a Nazi "fellow traveller" but was not charged with war crimes.[8] Throughout her later life, she denied having known about the Holocaust, and was criticized as the "voice of the 'how could we have known?' defense."[9][10][11] Riefenstahl's postwar work included an autobiography book and two photography books on the Nuba peoples of southern Sudan.
沒有留言:
張貼留言